F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: JSF to resume flights - F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-8609-start-0-sid-f33972ab5aa5d62efe35d4668fe1e6de.html
Printed on: 18 November 2008

Forum: F-35 Lightning II

JSF to resume flights



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Davy
PostPosted: Jul 10, 2007 - 07:07 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Sep 09, 2005
Posts: 29
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
Quote:
JSF to fly following electrical system review

By Graham Warwick

Lockheed Martin plans to resume flight-testing the first F-35 Joint Strike Fighter in August after a complete audit of the aircraft's electrical system was launched following a brief power failure on its last flight in early May.

The fault was caused by a short in the F-35's 270V power system when a lead inside a box touched the lid. "It was a short-duration event and the system responded exactly as it should," says air vehicle team lead Bobby Williams.

The power-by-wire flight-control system locked the affected surface - the right horizontal stabiliser - and adjusted the authority on the other control surfaces to compensate. "If the pilot had not known he had a fault, he would not have been aware of it from a flying qualities standpoint," says Williams.

The fault affected both branches of the power system where they come together to drive the stabiliser, but did not propagate outside the box to affect the rest of the aircraft, he adds.

Lockheed has completed a review of close-tolerance spacing in the aircraft's electrical system. "We have done a thorough audit of the 270V electrical power system to get the right spacing," says Williams. "Now we are going into each of the boxes on the aircraft to take a look at the tolerances. We will be back into flight in August."

The aircraft is undergoing scheduled upgrades while it is on the ground. "We are installing additional instrumentation, including inlet rakes, and doing additional proof testing, including the refuelling receptacle so we can start aerial refuelling," says Williams. The first release of prognostic health management software is being loaded, plus upgrades to the flight control software resulting from the first 19 flights.

Lockheed, meanwhile, has begun final assembly of the second JSF - the first F-35B short take-off and vertical landing variant. Mating of the major airframe sections began in June at Fort Worth, Texas and the aircraft is scheduled to roll out in December and fly in May next year. The aircraft, BF-1, is the first with the "optimised" airframe redesigned to reduce weight.

Source: <a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/07/10/215370/jsf-to-fly-following-electrical-system-review.html">Flight International</a>
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Nov 18, 2008 - 11:53 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





   
 
habu2
PostPosted: Jul 11, 2007 - 03:04 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Sep 05, 2003
Posts: 2804
Location: ACES II
Status: Offline
Quote:
"If the pilot had not known he had a fault, he would not have been aware of it from a flying qualities standpoint," says Williams.

Does that include landing at 220 kts????? Shocked

_________________
Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Raptor_claw
PostPosted: Jul 11, 2007 - 05:09 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Sep 29, 2006
Posts: 200

Status: Offline
habu2 wrote:
Quote:
"If the pilot had not known he had a fault, he would not have been aware of it from a flying qualities standpoint," says Williams.

Does that include landing at 220 kts????? Shocked


If you believe that he is speaking the truth (which you should), you cannot avoid the conclusion that the aircraft could have landed normally, at a nominal landing speed.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sprstdlyscottsmn
PostPosted: Jul 11, 2007 - 05:20 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Posts: 372

Status: Offline
the Super Bug has a similar system. I think that it is a great step in the FBW technology so that the aircraft auto trimmed out malfunctions of damage.

_________________
James,

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
johnwill
PostPosted: Jul 11, 2007 - 06:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 24, 2007
Posts: 441

Status: Offline
As do the IDF from Taiwan and the F-2 from Japan and others I'm sure. Following a control surface failure, the airplanes do not have the same control power, but retain enough to "get home" and land safely. For example, if one horizontal tail fails, pitch command still goes to the good tail, but that good tail will cause unwanted roll and yaw effects. These effects are balanced by counter-acting commands to the ailerons and rudders.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
dwightlooi
PostPosted: Jul 11, 2007 - 11:22 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Aug 01, 2006
Posts: 1003

Status: Offline
johnwill wrote:
As do the IDF from Taiwan and the F-2 from Japan and others I'm sure. Following a control surface failure, the airplanes do not have the same control power, but retain enough to "get home" and land safely. For example, if one horizontal tail fails, pitch command still goes to the good tail, but that good tail will cause unwanted roll and yaw effects. These effects are balanced by counter-acting commands to the ailerons and rudders.


Except the F-35 had full control systems availability and power following the glitch. Basically, power was rerouted and every functioned at 100% after a fraction of a second.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Raptor_claw
PostPosted: Jul 11, 2007 - 11:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Sep 29, 2006
Posts: 200

Status: Offline
dwightlooi wrote:
Except the F-35 had full control systems availability and power following the glitch. Basically, power was rerouted and every functioned at 100% after a fraction of a second.


The right horizontal tail did fail and did not recover.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
habu2
PostPosted: Jul 14, 2007 - 03:23 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Sep 05, 2003
Posts: 2804
Location: ACES II
Status: Offline
dwightlooi wrote:
Except the F-35 had full control systems availability and power following the glitch. Basically, power was rerouted and every functioned at 100% after a fraction of a second.

That doesn't explain the control surface configuration when the jet landed.

_________________
Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
primary_solution
PostPosted: Jul 16, 2007 - 05:56 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 8

Status: Offline
An article from the fort worth star telegram....

F-35 test flights may resume in August
By BOB COX
Star-Telegram staff writer

Flight testing of the F-35 Lightning II test aircraft probably will not resume until some time in August after a lengthy pause for upgrades and modifications.

Lockheed Martin spokesman John Smith said, "It would be a premature to comment on the exact date," but it is likely that the one flying test aircraft should return to the skies around Fort Worth some time next month.

The test flights were halted for scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and upgrades in early May after flight 19, in which an unexpected mechanical failure occurred.

The pause in flight testing has taken longer than anticipated, Smith said, because of time being spent to redesign, produce and install new electrical-system components to eliminate the problem.

But the delay doesn't mean that the flight-test program is falling significantly behind schedule. Smith said as a result of the work done so far, engineers have collected more data and learned more about the aircraft and its systems than anticipated and that knowledge is already being applied.

"The fix for [the electrical] anomaly," Smith said, "is going to be installed" in the second test aircraft, which is now being assembled and its components tested. That airplane, the first short-takeoff-vertical-landing version of the F-35, is not due to fly until mid-2008.

The May 3 flight was cut short and the pilot made an emergency landing when an electrical short damaged one of the aircraft's flight controls. Lockheed officials have said the incident proved extremely valuable, pinpointing a potentially serious problem early in the test-flight program and showing that the aircraft's flight-control computers and backup systems worked as planned.

The F-35 test schedule is built around accomplishing tasks and testing the aircraft in specific circumstances rather than on a strict schedule.

While the test aircraft has been grounded, engineers and maintenance personnel have gone ahead with some upgrades that were scheduled to be performed later.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LMAggie
PostPosted: Aug 15, 2007 - 03:15 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 287

Status: Offline
There is little effect to the schedule mainly due to the fact that a major software upgrade was scheduled soon after Flight 19. The repairs to the issue have since gone passed through that window, but it has been a relatively short delay and is unlikely to hamper the dynamic flight test schedule. The water cooler says flight 20 is not too far off and not long after that is STOVL roll-out Very Happy.

_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
johnwill
PostPosted: Aug 15, 2007 - 06:44 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 24, 2007
Posts: 441

Status: Offline
Loss of one tail surface motion means you have less pitch control power. Less pitch control power means you may need more airspeed to restore needed control. I am not saying that is why the landing was at 220 kt, but could have been part of the reason.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
habu2
PostPosted: Aug 17, 2007 - 10:53 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Sep 05, 2003
Posts: 2804
Location: ACES II
Status: Offline
IIRC the photo I saw showed one TEF down only, the other TEF and both LEFs were up. THAT would explain 220kts over the numbers.

_________________
Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
djcross
PostPosted: Aug 22, 2007 - 09:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Nov 10, 2005
Posts: 39

Status: Offline
Corona arcing isn't a pleasant thing to correct. It might fly again in September. Might. Confused
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
checksixx
PostPosted: Aug 22, 2007 - 11:00 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1035

Status: Offline
Uhhh...last I heard was that it wasn't flying right now because they were putting it through some updates that were supposed to happen anyway...just sooner because of the small hiccup rather than later. Thats all.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Yoram777
PostPosted: Aug 23, 2007 - 02:31 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 23, 2007
Posts: 22

Status: Offline
Haven’t seen any new pictures since the brief power failure and that’s over 3 months ago, It can’t be that hard to release a picture to keep people happy Sad
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel