| Author |
Message |
|
Davy
|
Posted: Jul 10, 2007 - 07:07 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Sep 09, 2005
Posts: 29
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
JSF to fly following electrical system review
By Graham Warwick
Lockheed Martin plans to resume flight-testing the first F-35 Joint Strike Fighter in August after a complete audit of the aircraft's electrical system was launched following a brief power failure on its last flight in early May.
The fault was caused by a short in the F-35's 270V power system when a lead inside a box touched the lid. "It was a short-duration event and the system responded exactly as it should," says air vehicle team lead Bobby Williams.
The power-by-wire flight-control system locked the affected surface - the right horizontal stabiliser - and adjusted the authority on the other control surfaces to compensate. "If the pilot had not known he had a fault, he would not have been aware of it from a flying qualities standpoint," says Williams.
The fault affected both branches of the power system where they come together to drive the stabiliser, but did not propagate outside the box to affect the rest of the aircraft, he adds.
Lockheed has completed a review of close-tolerance spacing in the aircraft's electrical system. "We have done a thorough audit of the 270V electrical power system to get the right spacing," says Williams. "Now we are going into each of the boxes on the aircraft to take a look at the tolerances. We will be back into flight in August."
The aircraft is undergoing scheduled upgrades while it is on the ground. "We are installing additional instrumentation, including inlet rakes, and doing additional proof testing, including the refuelling receptacle so we can start aerial refuelling," says Williams. The first release of prognostic health management software is being loaded, plus upgrades to the flight control software resulting from the first 19 flights.
Lockheed, meanwhile, has begun final assembly of the second JSF - the first F-35B short take-off and vertical landing variant. Mating of the major airframe sections began in June at Fort Worth, Texas and the aircraft is scheduled to roll out in December and fly in May next year. The aircraft, BF-1, is the first with the "optimised" airframe redesigned to reduce weight.
Source: <a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/07/10/215370/jsf-to-fly-following-electrical-system-review.html">Flight International</a>
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2008 - 11:55 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
habu2
|
Posted: Jul 11, 2007 - 03:04 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 05, 2003
Posts: 2804
Location: ACES II
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
"If the pilot had not known he had a fault, he would not have been aware of it from a flying qualities standpoint," says Williams.
Does that include landing at 220 kts?????  |
_________________ Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Raptor_claw
|
Posted: Jul 11, 2007 - 05:09 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Sep 29, 2006
Posts: 200
Status: Offline
|
|
habu2 wrote:
Quote:
"If the pilot had not known he had a fault, he would not have been aware of it from a flying qualities standpoint," says Williams.
Does that include landing at 220 kts?????
If you believe that he is speaking the truth (which you should), you cannot avoid the conclusion that the aircraft could have landed normally, at a nominal landing speed. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
Posted: Jul 11, 2007 - 05:20 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Posts: 372
Status: Offline
|
| the Super Bug has a similar system. I think that it is a great step in the FBW technology so that the aircraft auto trimmed out malfunctions of damage. |
_________________ James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
johnwill
|
Posted: Jul 11, 2007 - 06:48 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 24, 2007
Posts: 441
Status: Offline
|
| As do the IDF from Taiwan and the F-2 from Japan and others I'm sure. Following a control surface failure, the airplanes do not have the same control power, but retain enough to "get home" and land safely. For example, if one horizontal tail fails, pitch command still goes to the good tail, but that good tail will cause unwanted roll and yaw effects. These effects are balanced by counter-acting commands to the ailerons and rudders. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
dwightlooi
|
Posted: Jul 11, 2007 - 11:22 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Aug 01, 2006
Posts: 1003
Status: Offline
|
|
johnwill wrote:
As do the IDF from Taiwan and the F-2 from Japan and others I'm sure. Following a control surface failure, the airplanes do not have the same control power, but retain enough to "get home" and land safely. For example, if one horizontal tail fails, pitch command still goes to the good tail, but that good tail will cause unwanted roll and yaw effects. These effects are balanced by counter-acting commands to the ailerons and rudders.
Except the F-35 had full control systems availability and power following the glitch. Basically, power was rerouted and every functioned at 100% after a fraction of a second. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Raptor_claw
|
Posted: Jul 11, 2007 - 11:48 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Sep 29, 2006
Posts: 200
Status: Offline
|
|
dwightlooi wrote:
Except the F-35 had full control systems availability and power following the glitch. Basically, power was rerouted and every functioned at 100% after a fraction of a second.
The right horizontal tail did fail and did not recover. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
habu2
|
Posted: Jul 14, 2007 - 03:23 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 05, 2003
Posts: 2804
Location: ACES II
Status: Offline
|
|
dwightlooi wrote:
Except the F-35 had full control systems availability and power following the glitch. Basically, power was rerouted and every functioned at 100% after a fraction of a second.
That doesn't explain the control surface configuration when the jet landed. |
_________________ Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
 |
|
primary_solution
|
Posted: Jul 16, 2007 - 05:56 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 8
Status: Offline
|
An article from the fort worth star telegram....
F-35 test flights may resume in August
By BOB COX
Star-Telegram staff writer
Flight testing of the F-35 Lightning II test aircraft probably will not resume until some time in August after a lengthy pause for upgrades and modifications.
Lockheed Martin spokesman John Smith said, "It would be a premature to comment on the exact date," but it is likely that the one flying test aircraft should return to the skies around Fort Worth some time next month.
The test flights were halted for scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and upgrades in early May after flight 19, in which an unexpected mechanical failure occurred.
The pause in flight testing has taken longer than anticipated, Smith said, because of time being spent to redesign, produce and install new electrical-system components to eliminate the problem.
But the delay doesn't mean that the flight-test program is falling significantly behind schedule. Smith said as a result of the work done so far, engineers have collected more data and learned more about the aircraft and its systems than anticipated and that knowledge is already being applied.
"The fix for [the electrical] anomaly," Smith said, "is going to be installed" in the second test aircraft, which is now being assembled and its components tested. That airplane, the first short-takeoff-vertical-landing version of the F-35, is not due to fly until mid-2008.
The May 3 flight was cut short and the pilot made an emergency landing when an electrical short damaged one of the aircraft's flight controls. Lockheed officials have said the incident proved extremely valuable, pinpointing a potentially serious problem early in the test-flight program and showing that the aircraft's flight-control computers and backup systems worked as planned.
The F-35 test schedule is built around accomplishing tasks and testing the aircraft in specific circumstances rather than on a strict schedule.
While the test aircraft has been grounded, engineers and maintenance personnel have gone ahead with some upgrades that were scheduled to be performed later. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
LMAggie
|
Posted: Aug 15, 2007 - 03:15 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 287
Status: Offline
|
There is little effect to the schedule mainly due to the fact that a major software upgrade was scheduled soon after Flight 19. The repairs to the issue have since gone passed through that window, but it has been a relatively short delay and is unlikely to hamper the dynamic flight test schedule. The water cooler says flight 20 is not too far off and not long after that is STOVL roll-out . |
_________________ “Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
|
|
|
|
 |
|
johnwill
|
Posted: Aug 15, 2007 - 06:44 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 24, 2007
Posts: 441
Status: Offline
|
| Loss of one tail surface motion means you have less pitch control power. Less pitch control power means you may need more airspeed to restore needed control. I am not saying that is why the landing was at 220 kt, but could have been part of the reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
habu2
|
Posted: Aug 17, 2007 - 10:53 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 05, 2003
Posts: 2804
Location: ACES II
Status: Offline
|
| IIRC the photo I saw showed one TEF down only, the other TEF and both LEFs were up. THAT would explain 220kts over the numbers. |
_________________ Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
 |
|
djcross
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2007 - 09:51 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 10, 2005
Posts: 39
Status: Offline
|
Corona arcing isn't a pleasant thing to correct. It might fly again in September. Might.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
checksixx
|
Posted: Aug 22, 2007 - 11:00 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1035
Status: Offline
|
| Uhhh...last I heard was that it wasn't flying right now because they were putting it through some updates that were supposed to happen anyway...just sooner because of the small hiccup rather than later. Thats all. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Yoram777
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2007 - 02:31 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 23, 2007
Posts: 22
Status: Offline
|
Haven’t seen any new pictures since the brief power failure and that’s over 3 months ago, It can’t be that hard to release a picture to keep people happy  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|