F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: Scrambling at the Siren's Call - 113 FW - F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-8479-view-previous-sid-94eb505ea51631b4118aedcd1bf4db70.html
Printed on: 18 November 2008

Forum: General

Scrambling at the Siren's Call - 113 FW



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Asif
PostPosted: Aug 10, 2008 - 01:12 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Aug 23, 2003
Posts: 1763

The Washington Post wrote:

Scrambling at the Siren's Call
Since '01, an Andrews AFB squad has fired up its jets 2,000 times to intercept aircraft entering Washington's no-fly zones.

By Aaron C. Davis
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, August 10, 2008; Page SM03

In the Air National Guard office along a runway at Andrews Air Force Base, every pilot wears a green jumpsuit, except two. They wear the sand-colored ones of pilots flying combat missions overseas.

When Maj. Rob Balzano goes to the gym, he neatly folds his jumpsuit on a bench close by. At night, Maj. Chris Hardgrave lays his next to the bed. Like a good firefighter, he tucks a sock in each boot.

"It sets the tone for them and for us: Today they're at war," Lt. Col. David Miles said of the sand-colored flight suits and of the expectation that within seconds the two could sprint to waiting F-16s.

Balzano and Hardgrave are two of about 20 pilots who take turns waiting for an alarm that has sounded almost every day at Andrews since Sept. 11, 2001.

The 113th Wing of the D.C. Air National Guard recently marked its 2,000th scramble since the terrorist attacks. Almost every time, one of the pilots has climbed into an F-16 loaded with missiles, taxied to the end of a runway and waited for an order to intercept, and possibly shoot down, a plane headed toward Washington.

More than 90 percent of the time, Miles said, the suspect planes are cleared before the jets are launched. But each time the pilots, who call themselves the "Capital Guardians," must prepare for much more. Each has pondered the worst-case scenario, they say: shooting down a plane loaded with Americans. But none of them dwells on it.

Rather, like a company of firefighters, the pilots spend most of their time focusing, preparing and practicing for the next alarm.

"You never want to let yourself get really hungry or really tired, because that's when it will happen," Balzano said. The alarm, a wailing siren called a Klaxon, also goes off when no one can prepare for it.

"I ran out one night in my socks," said Master Sgt. Chuck Desot, head of the flight crew that keeps the planes ready to launch 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. It was 3 a.m., Desot said, and he awoke so disoriented that he decided not to waste time trying to put on his shoes until he got to the tarmac.

Hardgrave, Balzano and Miles said they have become so attuned to the alarm that they often react to the barely audible "click" that precedes it. "It's like the first sound when someone gets on the PA system to make an announcement at the grocery store," Hardgrave said. "My eyes pop open a split second before I hear" the siren, he said.

The alarm blares from speakers on the walls of a double-wide that has been parked beside the Guard hangars since shortly after Sept. 11. In the living room of the trailer, where the two on-duty pilots spend a good part of their 24-hour shifts watching a large-screen TV, flashing lights go off in a color that corresponds to the threat level. Usually, the light is yellow, meaning pilots must fire up their jets and prepare to launch.

In the spring, the light went yellow, then red, three times, meaning suspect planes were heading directly for the restricted airspace over downtown Washington and the F-16s would launch to intercept.

Miles, who at the time of the 2001 attacks was flying jets for United Airlines and until recently led the squadron at Andrews, was on duty during the most memorable of the three. He took off but quickly realized that the data link that provides the location of the suspect plane was not working and that it was dusk and would be hard to spot the plane without the link. It being evening, there was another factor: It was rush hour in Washington's airspace, with commercial flights circling in for landings at Dulles, Reagan and Baltimore airports.

"It was an intense first few minutes," Miles said, before he spotted the two-engine plane cruising along at 14,000 feet. He was ordered to look into the plane's cockpit "to see if we could determine intent," Miles said. He couldn't slow down the jet to the same speed as the plane without stalling, Miles said, so he flew by "close enough to see his baseball hat." "It wasn't the Nats, I could tell you that."

The plane's pilot soon began fumbling with his radio and responded to orders by air traffic controllers to land in Virginia, Miles said. Although it was more difficult than usual to find him, Miles said, the interaction with the small-plane pilot has been the most common type of intercept by the squad, known officially as the 121st Fighter Squadron Air Sovereignty Alert Detachment.

The number of private pilots who inadvertently wander into Washington's no-fly zones is decreasing, Miles said, but they still account for most of the incidents that trigger alerts at Andrews.

A handful of times, he said, the squad also has scrambled to tail commercial airliners arriving from overseas after disturbances onboard or suspicious activity by passengers. Miles said the airliners were never intercepted. He declined to say how many of the 2,000-plus scrambles resulted in intercepts.

With the Andrews squad remaining busy with intercepts, a permanent $16 million hangar with barracks for Guard pilots and flight crews is under construction near the end of a runway, said Col. Jeffrey R. Johnson, commander of the 113th Wing.

The location will cut down taxi time needed to get an F-16 airborne, Johnson said. "It will shave a minute or two, but that could be the difference."


source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 04169.html



PH2008080804171.jpg
 Description:
Majs. Rob Balzano, left, and Chris Hardgrave are part of the D.C. ANG 113th Wing, whose F-16s protect the skies over Washington. [Photos By Mark Gail - The Washington Post]
 Filesize:  26.13 KB
 Viewed:  1532 Time(s)

PH2008080804171.jpg



_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Nov 18, 2008 - 7:28 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





   
 
Unwin
PostPosted: Aug 10, 2008 - 11:26 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 42

Status: Offline
Very Interesting. Thanks for the post.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Racer181
PostPosted: Aug 10, 2008 - 11:48 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 181

Status: Offline
I worked alert for the 140th Wing Colorado ANG for I was dissapointed i never got a scramble (i mean dissapointed i never got to experiance an alert launch). I always slept in my BDU pants and a black hooded sweatshirt and had my boots right next to the bed ready to jump into them.

_________________
Putting warheads on foreheads
SrA Joe
Former ACC 86-0258
181st Intel Wing "Racers"
Base Honor Guard
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Block25Crewchief
PostPosted: Aug 11, 2008 - 01:25 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: 161
Location: Langley AFB (Alert)
Status: Offline
I just went up there and visited the boys pulling alert at the DCANG. They are a true group of professionals who take their job extremely seriously. Lt.Col Miles use to fly with my unit as well as a few other pilots who now call the DCANG home. It was nice to see old friendly faces. It was also great to see how they do business and the level of professionalism that they bring to the mission. They are a great bunch of guys who have done, and continue to do a truly incredible job with the mission that they have.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Obamanite
PostPosted: Aug 11, 2008 - 02:20 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: May 26, 2008
Posts: 311

Status: Offline
Unless it constitutes OpSec, anyone know what the Viper's usual loadout is during these intercepts?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Block25Crewchief
PostPosted: Aug 11, 2008 - 05:55 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: 161
Location: Langley AFB (Alert)
Status: Offline
Yeah..... That would be something that we don't discuss in a public forum.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Obamanite
PostPosted: Aug 11, 2008 - 06:07 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: May 26, 2008
Posts: 311

Status: Offline
Block25Crewchief wrote:
Yeah..... That would be something that we don't discuss in a public forum.


I hear you. Thanks anyway.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Obamanite
PostPosted: Aug 11, 2008 - 06:08 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: May 26, 2008
Posts: 311

Status: Offline
Block25Crewchief wrote:
Yeah..... That would be something that we don't discuss in a public forum.


BTW, I see you're at Langley. Are the Raptors there flying these sorts of missions as well?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
egresstroop
PostPosted: Aug 11, 2008 - 10:13 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 12, 2005
Posts: 47

Status: Offline
Block25Crewchief wrote:
Yeah..... That would be something that we don't discuss in a public forum.


I think this works for this last question as well...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
AfterburnerDecalsScott
PostPosted: Aug 12, 2008 - 02:25 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 10, 2005
Posts: 1124

Status: Offline
F-16 standard A2A loadout is pretty finite....there's only so many places to hang a missile, and we only use 2 kinds. There's nothing exotic about an interceptor loadout....usually there is a mix of heaters and slammers for maximum flexibility. There's hundreds of open source references to viper A2A loads.

Here's a fun thread covering A2A weps loads.

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopi ... r-asc.html

_________________
More people have died driving with Ted Kennedy than hunting with Dick Cheney.
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
Obamanite
PostPosted: Aug 12, 2008 - 07:35 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: May 26, 2008
Posts: 311

Status: Offline
AfterburnerDecalsScott wrote:
F-16 standard A2A loadout is pretty finite....there's only so many places to hang a missile, and we only use 2 kinds. There's nothing exotic about an interceptor loadout....usually there is a mix of heaters and slammers for maximum flexibility. There's hundreds of open source references to viper A2A loads.

Here's a fun thread covering A2A weps loads.

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopi ... r-asc.html


I'm rather well-versed on the F-16's usual loadouts, both AG and AA. Was just wondering about what they typically haul in one of these missions, my guess being 4, not 6 AAMs, probably 2 AIM-9s and 2 AIM-120s. This is in contrast to a typical AA loadout during OIF (in addition to whatever AG store was carried in Sta. 3 and 7), which tended to be 3 AIM-120s and just one AIM-9. Also, fully loaded AA-configured Vipers during ODF tended to carry 4 AIM-120s and 2 AIM-9s. Limited stations and stores, yes, but rather sundry variations thereof.

BTW, anyone have recent images of a fully-loaded, AA-configured Eagle? Used to see plenty of BT Eagles back in the 80s bristling with 4 AIM-7s and 4 AIM-9s. However, I don't I've ever seen a fully-loaded Eagle with AIM-120s, that is, 6 AIM-120s and 2 AIM-9s. My understanding is that they had some separation issues with the AIM-120s in the rear two conformal stations. Were those issues ever resolved? Are the Eagles now limited to only 4 AIM-120s and 2 AIM-9s as a result, merely equivalent to an F-16's max loadout?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Siesta
PostPosted: Aug 13, 2008 - 11:57 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: May 02, 2004
Posts: 109

Status: Offline
Theres a book out called Touching History by Lynn Spencer just published. It chronicles the events on 9-11 from the pilots and controllers from interviews with the pilots from the F-15s at Otis to the DC ANG F-16s and the ones from Langley to the FAA controllers to the air defense guys. It also talks to civilian pilots not just in the US also out of the Pacific being intercepted by F-15s out of Hawaii. It gives you a better understanding of how things happened on 9-11 much more in depth than the movie United 93. No pictures. You will definately understand how chaotic things were and also gave me some insight on how the internet rumor about United 93 got shotdown got started. I recommend it. Lynn Spencer herself is a business jet pilot.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Siesta
PostPosted: Aug 15, 2008 - 11:57 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: May 02, 2004
Posts: 109

Status: Offline
Obamanite wrote:
AfterburnerDecalsScott wrote:
F-16 standard A2A loadout is pretty finite....there's only so many places to hang a missile, and we only use 2 kinds. There's nothing exotic about an interceptor loadout....usually there is a mix of heaters and slammers for maximum flexibility. There's hundreds of open source references to viper A2A loads.

Here's a fun thread covering A2A weps loads.

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopi ... r-asc.html


I'm rather well-versed on the F-16's usual loadouts, both AG and AA. Was just wondering about what they typically haul in one of these missions, my guess being 4, not 6 AAMs, probably 2 AIM-9s and 2 AIM-120s. This is in contrast to a typical AA loadout during OIF (in addition to whatever AG store was carried in Sta. 3 and 7), which tended to be 3 AIM-120s and just one AIM-9. Also, fully loaded AA-configured Vipers during ODF tended to carry 4 AIM-120s and 2 AIM-9s. Limited stations and stores, yes, but rather sundry variations thereof.

BTW, anyone have recent images of a fully-loaded, AA-configured Eagle? Used to see plenty of BT Eagles back in the 80s bristling with 4 AIM-7s and 4 AIM-9s. However, I don't I've ever seen a fully-loaded Eagle with AIM-120s, that is, 6 AIM-120s and 2 AIM-9s. My understanding is that they had some separation issues with the AIM-120s in the rear two conformal stations. Were those issues ever resolved? Are the Eagles now limited to only 4 AIM-120s and 2 AIM-9s as a result, merely equivalent to an F-16's max loadout?


Conformal tanks? I think your referring to the F-15E strike Eagle... which normally hangs bombs on the conformals. But there are pics of the 391st FS F-15Es pulling alert at of all places Fort Hood with Air Defense configuration protecting the Bush residence as F-15Cs were grounded. The F-15Cs still carry a full load.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Obamanite
PostPosted: Aug 16, 2008 - 02:58 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: May 26, 2008
Posts: 311

Status: Offline
Siesta wrote:
Obamanite wrote:
AfterburnerDecalsScott wrote:
F-16 standard A2A loadout is pretty finite....there's only so many places to hang a missile, and we only use 2 kinds. There's nothing exotic about an interceptor loadout....usually there is a mix of heaters and slammers for maximum flexibility. There's hundreds of open source references to viper A2A loads.

Here's a fun thread covering A2A weps loads.

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopi ... r-asc.html


I'm rather well-versed on the F-16's usual loadouts, both AG and AA. Was just wondering about what they typically haul in one of these missions, my guess being 4, not 6 AAMs, probably 2 AIM-9s and 2 AIM-120s. This is in contrast to a typical AA loadout during OIF (in addition to whatever AG store was carried in Sta. 3 and 7), which tended to be 3 AIM-120s and just one AIM-9. Also, fully loaded AA-configured Vipers during ODF tended to carry 4 AIM-120s and 2 AIM-9s. Limited stations and stores, yes, but rather sundry variations thereof.

BTW, anyone have recent images of a fully-loaded, AA-configured Eagle? Used to see plenty of BT Eagles back in the 80s bristling with 4 AIM-7s and 4 AIM-9s. However, I don't I've ever seen a fully-loaded Eagle with AIM-120s, that is, 6 AIM-120s and 2 AIM-9s. My understanding is that they had some separation issues with the AIM-120s in the rear two conformal stations. Were those issues ever resolved? Are the Eagles now limited to only 4 AIM-120s and 2 AIM-9s as a result, merely equivalent to an F-16's max loadout?


Conformal tanks? I think your referring to the F-15E strike Eagle... which normally hangs bombs on the conformals. But there are pics of the 391st FS F-15Es pulling alert at of all places Fort Hood with Air Defense configuration protecting the Bush residence as F-15Cs were grounded. The F-15Cs still carry a full load.


No, I actually did mean the conformal stations, as opposed to the stations on the conformal tanks. I don't remember seeing AMRAAMs loaded on the two rear conformal (fuselage) stations on an F-15C, and I've never seen an F-15C carrying a full load of AMRAAMs. And yes, it's always interesting to see a Mud Hen loaded for air-to-air, which it is perfectly capable of performing.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel