Forum: F-16 versus XYZ

Forum Veteran Joined: Jul 01, 2007 - 07:22 PM Posts: 620

The -22s would never be seen unless they wanted to be. Four Raptors can carry fifty-six -120s. Yes, they have four external hardpoints. The -16s would win overall, with a total of 96 AMRAAMs (six each) but might take losses if we had to merge, I doubt it though. The Migs are junk.

F-16.net Sponsor

F-22 are ages ahead of F-16's in any aspect. It has proven in worst case scenarios training that F-22's have a kill ratio in excess of hundreds to 1. Thus by no stretch of imagination you could argue that it would take only 4 to kill 1 F-22, only if the f-22 pilot is a moron.

Comparing AMRAAM numbers each can carry is pointless, as by 40 miles the F-16 would be in a missile dodging gauntlet while the Falcons would do but shooting blind AMRAAM's againt the raptor, no matter how much missile air saturation you could do. Then you would in efect being maddoging all those missiles at BVR with no efect. Every APG-66/68's variants are just not good enough to deal with low observability.

Forum Veteran Joined: Jul 01, 2007 - 07:22 PM Posts: 620

I guess something got lost in translation. I'll spell it out for you. Raptors against Fulcrums. Vipers against Fulcrums. My squadron flew against the Raptors. Very frustrating. Clear?

I say it depends highly on the pilots of the aircraft..

shiz302 wrote:

" What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. "

How do you hear what I type, do you have text to speech setup on your computer? I was simply posting an F-16 versus XYZ which verses XYZ type scenario.

How about this scenario...

4xF-22's versus 16xF-16 versus 32xFalcrums versus 1xHillary Clinton versus 1xChuck Norris Very Happy

flames wrote:

I say it depends highly on the pilots of the aircraft..

So you're saying if the F-22 pilots are 16 year old football stars the F-16 or Mig's come out on top?

thSnakeHandler wrote:

I guess something got lost in translation. I'll spell it out for you. Raptors against Fulcrums. Vipers against Fulcrums. My squadron flew against the Raptors. Very frustrating. Clear?

woah, necroed thread, but even after 3 years I have to repond to this post.

Maybe you should re read your post as if you were somebody else instead of reacting hot headed with that harsh post. English is my second language only but I consider myself to be fluent enough. To me it looked like your discussion joined all planes into a massive dogfight. Very Happy

learn portuguese and then well disccuss about your suposed IQ advantage... Wink

SnakeHandler wrote:

but might take losses if we had to merge, I doubt it though. The Migs are junk.

Speaking of dumb, the the migs are old yes, but after the merge with the falcons has hapened thats where they are best at. There are more than a few chances to get hurt in that furball lottery. Maybe you should try some day heh?

Good luck.

maddog2840 wrote:

A Moose Once Bit My Sister....

Hasn't she been told to not feed those moose?

Forum: F-16 versus XYZ

Four F-22 versus 16 F-16 who then fight 32 Falcrums