| Author |
Message |
|
idesof
|
 Posted: Mar 02, 2007 - 02:47 AM
|
 
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: May 29, 2006
Posts: 640
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: Nov 18, 2008 - 6:47 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
sferrin
|
|
Posted: Mar 02, 2007 - 01:52 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 1088
Status: Offline
|
| That thing is almost as old as the dinosaurs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dwightlooi
|
|
Posted: Mar 02, 2007 - 04:43 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Aug 01, 2006
Posts: 1003
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
afnsucks
|
|
Posted: Mar 02, 2007 - 06:51 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Jun 16, 2006
Posts: 197
Status: Offline
|
Can we really afford to export our greatest assists such as the F-26?  Just outta curiosity though: three intakes on a single engine; what would that do? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sagikor
|
|
Posted: Mar 02, 2007 - 01:41 PM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jul 30, 2006
Posts: 9
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
RyanCollins
|
|
Posted: Mar 04, 2007 - 10:24 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Nov 07, 2004
Posts: 603
Status: Offline
|
IMHO, the STALMA is a piece of Sierra, looks like the (IIRC) X-27 from the Ace Combat, and the Su-34.
But I like the F-35E !!!
 |
_________________
Pónganse de pie, Argentina avanza!
|
|
|
|
|
|
MechFromHell
|
|
Posted: Mar 04, 2007 - 11:23 PM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Posts: 306
Status: Offline
|
The "Stalma" looks about as aerodynamic and air worthy as my combat boots! What a piece!  |
_________________
Crew Chief
Mountain Home AFB 2000-2005 ~ Acft 91-0370
Sheppard AFB 2005- NOW
www.myspace.com/mechfromhell
|
|
|
|
|
|
beepa
|
|
Posted: Mar 15, 2007 - 06:16 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 05, 2007
Posts: 41
Status: Offline
|
| So this is the result of too much Star Wars.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master-of-Disaster
|
|
Posted: Mar 15, 2007 - 03:00 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: May 08, 2005
Posts: 69
Status: Offline
|
| Well, the kid who made this sure knows how to draw, but that's where the story ends. |
_________________
When flying, always make sure the pointy end goes forward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FDiron
|
|
Posted: Mar 31, 2007 - 05:30 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 88
Status: Offline
|
| F-35E is a piece of crap. Majorly reduced performance and payload for the so-called advantages of stealth? Its alot easier to build a stronger radar than it is a stealthier aircraft. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dwightlooi
|
|
Posted: Mar 31, 2007 - 05:55 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Aug 01, 2006
Posts: 1003
Status: Offline
|
|
FDiron wrote:
F-35E is a piece of crap. Majorly reduced performance and payload for the so-called advantages of stealth? Its alot easier to build a stronger radar than it is a stealthier aircraft.
I am sorry you don't like my idea and drawing. Thats OK, no problem.
However, you are completely wrong about it being easier to build a better radar. To make up for the detectability differences between an F-16 class airframe and an F-35 class airframe through radar improvement will require an ~1000 times increase in output.
Try putting this thing on a fighter or even an AWACs...
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f-35guy
|
|
Posted: May 12, 2007 - 11:29 AM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: May 11, 2007
Posts: 4
Status: Offline
|
| The speed technology's advancing, we'll see radar this strong on aircraft one day... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dwightlooi
|
|
Posted: May 12, 2007 - 04:18 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Aug 01, 2006
Posts: 1003
Status: Offline
|
|
f-35guy wrote:
The speed technology's advancing, we'll see radar this strong on aircraft one day...
LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
playloud
|
|
Posted: May 14, 2007 - 03:55 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 13, 2006
Posts: 24
Status: Offline
|
| You would no longer need missiles. You could fry your enemy from afar. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Forum Guidelines
