Forum: F-35 Lightning II

Overview of F-35 test flights



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1 ... 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 ... 32  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
f35phixer
PostPosted: Jun 06, 2010 - 11:58 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: May 13, 2009 - 11:38 PM
Posts: 130

Status: Offline
yes we have had wiring ISSUES from the very beginning on these jets, it's been very frustrating but as stated easily fixed !

But I'm really talking about BF-04.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Feb 12, 2012 - 5:39 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
VarkVet
PostPosted: Jun 06, 2010 - 09:10 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 1397

Status: Offline
Interesting, JSF has herpes? Shrug

Source: jsf.mil



sdd_f35testa_099.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  217.88 KB
 Viewed:  4200 Time(s)

sdd_f35testa_099.jpg



_________________
My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline


Last edited by VarkVet on Jun 07, 2010 - 04:08 AM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LMAggie
PostPosted: Jun 06, 2010 - 09:55 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 12, 2007 - 08:43 AM
Posts: 572

Status: Offline
I think that's where the drag chute braces tie into the substructure. I think this picture is AA-1, and for some reason it always had protruding head fasteners where the drag chute fitting would tie in. The drag chute fitting is only used during high AOA testing (which was never done on AA-1 which makes it even stranger). Hopefully someone else can back me up on this.

_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LMAggie
PostPosted: Jun 06, 2010 - 09:58 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 12, 2007 - 08:43 AM
Posts: 572

Status: Offline
BTW, a strange new airplane flew today from NAS JRB. Wink

_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
VarkVet
PostPosted: Jun 06, 2010 - 10:12 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 1397

Status: Offline
LMAggie wrote:
BTW, a strange new airplane flew today from NAS JRB. Wink


Sweet Applause

I hope live feeds are available when she does her first carrier landing and launch Thumb

_________________
My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Ztex
PostPosted: Jun 06, 2010 - 10:24 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Dec 13, 2006 - 05:17 PM
Posts: 167

Status: Offline
WOOT!

Congrats!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
VarkVet
PostPosted: Jun 06, 2010 - 10:27 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 1397

Status: Offline
LMAggie wrote:
I think that's where the drag chute braces tie into the substructure


Makes sense!

Pretty important test to find departure/recovery limits!



060315-F-2383G-013.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  334.24 KB
 Viewed:  4130 Time(s)

060315-F-2383G-013.jpg



_________________
My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
seruriermarshal
PostPosted: Jun 07, 2010 - 12:53 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jun 10, 2007 - 03:01 AM
Posts: 169

Status: Offline
LMAggie wrote:
BTW, a strange new airplane flew today from NAS JRB. Wink


Wow F-35C make it first fly !
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sextusempiricus
PostPosted: Jun 07, 2010 - 02:25 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Banned


Joined: Aug 17, 2009 - 06:26 AM
Posts: 267
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Status: Offline
This is very good news for the program. Congrats to all involved, and kudos for working on a Sunday. Here are a couple of links with pics:

http://www.fencecheck.com/forums/index. ... icseen#new

http://www.bensware.com/photos/events/F35CCF1First/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sextusempiricus
PostPosted: Jun 07, 2010 - 02:47 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Banned


Joined: Aug 17, 2009 - 06:26 AM
Posts: 267
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Status: Offline
BTW, the F-35 will never be a good-looking aircraft, but the C model is definitely the least bad-looking of the three. The larger wings and tails certainly make it look much better.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SpudmanWP
PostPosted: Jun 07, 2010 - 07:01 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 2891
Location: California
Status: Offline
..deleted
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
neptune
PostPosted: Jun 07, 2010 - 06:39 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 632
Location: 77007
Status: Offline
VarkVet wrote:
LMAggie wrote:
BTW, a strange new airplane flew today from NAS JRB. Wink


Sweet Applause

I hope live feeds are available when she does her first carrier landing and launch Thumb


Congrats!

Cheers Very Happy

Same for EMALS and JPALS

I'm hoping that while at PAX they will also test at Lakehurst on EMALS.

With EMALS, JPALS and F-35C the US Navy is moving an order of magnitude to a new generation for aviation. Cool
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
neptune
PostPosted: Jun 08, 2010 - 12:06 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 632
Location: 77007
Status: Offline
JSF Carrier Variant Meets First Flight Goals By Graham Warwick graham_warwick@aviationweek.com
-Handling qualities of the F-35C Joint Strike Fighter “exceeded expectations” on the June 6 first flight, says Lockheed Martin test pilot Jeff Knowles. Knowles says the aircraft approached at 135 kt., compared with 155 kt. for the smaller-winged F-35A and B variants at the same 40,000-lb. gross weight. Takeoff rotation speed was 15-20 kt. slower, he says. The 57-min. first flight focused on gear-down handling and formation flying with the F/A-18 chase aircraft in “an early look at handling around the carrier”, says Knowles, adding “The approach was very stable, with good roll response.” The landing gear and arrestor hook were cycled and throttle slams conducted to check engine operation. This was the first flight of a production-configuration Pratt & Whitney F135 engine, says Tom Burbage, executive vice president and general manager, F-35 program integration. The aircraft is expected to complete up to 15 flights from Lockheed’s Fort Worth, Texas, plant then undergo structural-coupling and ground-vibration testing before ferrying to the U.S. Navy’s Patuxent River, Md., test center in October. Two more F-35Cs are on the flight line and expected to ferry to Pax by year-end. Burbage says drop testing of an F-35C ground-test article at Vought Aircraft Industries is about 80% complete, including high sink rates with external stores, with no loading or structural issues.
- The first JSF mission-system test aircraft, BF-4, is planned to ferry to Pax River today to join the first three F-35B short-take-off-and-landing test aircraft.
- The first conventional-takeoff-and-landing F-35A mission-system test aircraft, AF-3, is expected to fly this week and ferry to Edwards AFB, Calif., next month to join AF-1 and 2.
- In its mark-up of Fiscal 2011 defense authorization legislation, the House Armed Services Committee has tied F-35 funding to key test milestones, including flying the first F-35C and delivering 12 development aircraft to service test centers by the end of 2010. The final two of those 12 aircraft, AF-4 and BF-5, have been completed, says Burbage, acknowledging test aircraft have been up to six months late. AF-4 is planned to ferry to Edwards in the third quarter, while BF-5 is to be delivered to Pax by year-end.

Congrats to program personnel for success from the hardwork. Looks like that janitor at NAS/ JRB FW may need help emptying ashtrays, real soon. Best Wishes. Very Happy
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
seruriermarshal
PostPosted: Jun 08, 2010 - 01:20 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jun 10, 2007 - 03:01 AM
Posts: 169

Status: Offline
So they 'll take F-35A AF-3 fly this week .

Smile
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
popcorn
PostPosted: Jun 08, 2010 - 02:41 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 925

Status: Offline
Pardon my ignorance but will A, B and C variants have to through all the identical test points in addition to the unique testing requirements specific to each model (eg. vertical landing for B, catapult takeoff/arrested landing for C)? What areas of the test program would benefit from commonality?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2011 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel
Site F-35 Section Forum