| Author |
Message |
|
LMAggie
|
 Posted: Feb 12, 2008 - 04:22 PM
|
 
|
|
Active member
Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 201
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
|
| Flight 30 was Feb 7 with Kromberg as PIC. Its getting hard to keep up. |
_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 17, 2008 - 3:14 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
seruriermarshal
|
|
Posted: Feb 13, 2008 - 01:24 AM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Posts: 10
Status: Offline
|
|
LMAggie wrote:
Flight 30 was Feb 7 with Kromberg as PIC. Its getting hard to keep up.
What's meaning with that ?
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
checksixx
|
|
Posted: Feb 13, 2008 - 01:47 AM
|
|
|
Elite
Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 995
Location: Langley AFB, VA
Status: Offline
|
| I think he means that Kromberg was pilot in command on flight 30 and that its getting hard to keep track with all the flying going on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
seruriermarshal
|
|
Posted: Feb 13, 2008 - 01:57 AM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Posts: 10
Status: Offline
|
| So a fail for Flight 30 ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LMAggie
|
|
Posted: Feb 13, 2008 - 03:03 AM
|
|
|
Active member
Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 201
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
|
|
checksixx wrote:
I think he means that Kromberg was pilot in command on flight 30 and that its getting hard to keep track with all the flying going on.
Yep. |
_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
|
|
|
|
|
|
LMAggie
|
|
Posted: Feb 13, 2008 - 06:15 PM
|
|
|
Active member
Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 201
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
|
| Flight 31 today with Knowles. I'm stopping once AA:1 goes to EAFB. lol |
_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
|
|
|
|
|
|
checksixx
|
|
Posted: Feb 13, 2008 - 07:30 PM
|
|
|
Elite
Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 995
Location: Langley AFB, VA
Status: Offline
|
|
seruriermarshal wrote:
So a fail for Flight 30 ?
Okay, what are you asking? Is there a language barrier here that we should be made aware of? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corsair1963
|
|
Posted: Feb 13, 2008 - 08:14 PM
|
|
|
Elite
Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 601
Status: Offline
|
|
checksixx wrote:
seruriermarshal wrote:
So a fail for Flight 30 ?
Okay, what are you asking? Is there a language barrier here that we should be made aware of?
Your not the only one lost here???  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LMAggie
|
|
Posted: Feb 16, 2008 - 05:45 AM
|
|
|
Active member
Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 201
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
|
| Flight 32 with Beesley on 2/14/08. |
_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
|
|
|
|
|
|
LMAggie
|
|
Posted: Mar 06, 2008 - 01:26 PM
|
|
|
Active member
Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 201
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
|
| After some scheduled downtime for maintenance, flight 33 was yesterday ( 3/5/08 ) with Beesley. I think KC135 tanker support is supposed to show up next week. |
_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
|
|
|
|
|
|
brancwp
|
|
Posted: Mar 08, 2008 - 01:45 AM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Feb 26, 2008
Posts: 12
Status: Offline
|
| The Tanker is suppose to show up Monday with aerial refueling qualification most of next week. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
brancwp
|
|
Posted: Mar 12, 2008 - 11:22 PM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Feb 26, 2008
Posts: 12
Status: Offline
|
| Today Jon Beesley few 1.6 hours with a tanker. 5 connects/disconnects performed to rate HQ. He said it was twice as easy to refuel as the F-16. No actual fuel was transfered. This was flight 34. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
elp
|
|
Posted: Mar 13, 2008 - 01:37 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor
Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2787
Location: Australia
|
Great news !!   |
_________________
- ELP -
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corsair1963
|
|
Posted: Mar 13, 2008 - 03:48 AM
|
|
|
Elite
Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 601
Status: Offline
|
| I wonder in what way the F-35 was easier to refuel than the F-16? (i.e. more stable?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corsair1963
|
|
Posted: Mar 13, 2008 - 03:50 AM
|
|
|
Elite
Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 601
Status: Offline
|
|
elp wrote:
Great news !!
I have to say I am a little surprised by your applause? I was sure by your many comments. That you were in the Anti-JSF Club..........  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Forum Guidelines
