| Author |
Message |
|
RJE71
|
 Posted: Mar 25, 2004 - 06:25 PM
|
 
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Mar 18, 2004 - 10:46 PM
Posts: 10
Status: Offline
|
I would like to know if F-16D 86-0046 would have the large or small intake ?
RJ
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 27, 2012 - 1:22 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
habu2
|
|
Posted: Mar 25, 2004 - 08:14 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Sep 05, 2003 - 09:36 PM
Posts: 2812
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pumpkin
|
|
Posted: Mar 25, 2004 - 10:09 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Nov 07, 2003 - 09:12 PM
Posts: 901
|
habu2, what can I say? Wanted to post this. But didn't manage to....
cheers,  |
_________________
Desmond
|
|
|
|
|
|
habu2
|
|
Posted: Mar 25, 2004 - 10:43 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Sep 05, 2003 - 09:36 PM
Posts: 2812
Status: Offline
|
| RJE71, Pumpkin, the linked file covers USAF/USN Block 30/32 production from the first FY SerNo that had a GE engine (an F-16N) to the last USAF Block 30 produced. This is the range that is most often confusing to even the most learned Viperholic. Notice that the end of Block 25 production overlapped the beginning of Block 30/32 production - at least from a FY SerNo standpoint. The information was taken directly from the Block 25/30/32 -1 manual. |
_________________
Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
|
|
habu2
|
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 - 03:26 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Sep 05, 2003 - 09:36 PM
Posts: 2812
Status: Offline
|
| A helpful pic - the tic marks are six inches apart: |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
30.84 KB |
| Viewed: |
2192 Time(s) |
|
_________________
Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Habu
|
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 - 06:04 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator
Joined: Oct 21, 2003 - 06:12 AM
Posts: 2729
Status: Offline
|
| Where'd you find that, never seen it. |
_________________
Do your homework, Tiger!
|
|
|
|
|
|
habu2
|
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 - 06:53 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Sep 05, 2003 - 09:36 PM
Posts: 2812
Status: Offline
|
| From an old old old (did I mention old?) AvWeek issue. |
_________________
Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Habu
|
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 - 06:58 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator
Joined: Oct 21, 2003 - 06:12 AM
Posts: 2729
Status: Offline
|
Yeah, looks old....stands to reason why I haven't seen it and you have  |
_________________
Do your homework, Tiger!
|
|
|
|
|
|
RJE71
|
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 - 07:34 PM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Mar 18, 2004 - 10:46 PM
Posts: 10
Status: Offline
|
Thanks Habu2 ..
I am just trying to figure what F-16 I want to build .. I want to do a few in 72nd .. One is a block 40 that I want to do and that is fairly staright forward ..
But I want to to a Wolfpack jet from about 1990 time frame ..
I was hopin that they were small inlet but since thats not the case, I guess I will pick up two of the Hasagawa CJ kit ..
Cheers
Robert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
habu2
|
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 - 08:04 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Sep 05, 2003 - 09:36 PM
Posts: 2812
Status: Offline
|
| RJE71, in 1:72 kits with MCID inlets you have three choices, the Hasegawa CG/CJ/DJ series (#s 125, 169, 174, 358, 370, 448 and 631), the newer Revell #4633 and Monogram #85-5309 kits, or the AMT/ERTL kit #8927. The AMT/ERTL kit has the MCID but no other 40/50 parts like bulged gear doors etc. |
_________________
Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
|
|
RJE71
|
|
Posted: Mar 26, 2004 - 10:31 PM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Mar 18, 2004 - 10:46 PM
Posts: 10
Status: Offline
|
Habu2 .. Thanks again .. I will use the Hasagawa kit .. I never really had any problems with there Viper kits ...
I think it will not be to hard to scratch build the block 40 Hud frame to get it to look correct ..
Robert |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
