F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: SNIPER for Pakistan F-16s - F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-7835-view-next-sid-2030391360e845680103fe470048844d.html
Printed on: 18 November 2008

Forum: F-16 News

SNIPER for Pakistan F-16s



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
elp
PostPosted: May 01, 2007 - 05:34 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2862

The article says "SNIPER" but since this is an export deal shouldn't this say "PANTERA"? ( export version of SNIPER ).

Quote:
Lockheed Martin Missile and Fire Control in Orlando, FL received a $54.6 million firm-fixed-price contract to provide for 22 Sniper targeting pods and associated support for foreign military sales requirements to Pakistan. At this time, $27.3 million have been obligated. Solicitations began March 2007, negotiations were complete April 2007, and work will be complete December 2010. The Headquarters 542d Combat Sustainment Wing, Robins Air Force Base, GA issued the contract (FA8539-07-C-0009). In its DSCA-anounced requests, Pakistan had requested the pods as a component of its $1.3 billion buy of 60 requested F-16A/B Mid-Life Update (MLU) modification and Falcon Star Structural Service Life Enhancement kits.


http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/200 ... /index.php

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Nov 18, 2008 - 5:37 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





   
 
Boman
PostPosted: May 01, 2007 - 01:12 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jul 08, 2004
Posts: 635

Status: Offline
Pantera was the offical designation of the export version of the Sniper XR, however it has been dropped and they are all refered to as Sniper now Smile

_________________
Best regards
Niels
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
idesof
PostPosted: May 01, 2007 - 11:38 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: May 29, 2006
Posts: 640

Status: Offline
elp wrote:
The article says "SNIPER" but since this is an export deal shouldn't this say "PANTERA"? ( export version of SNIPER ).

Quote:
Lockheed Martin Missile and Fire Control in Orlando, FL received a $54.6 million firm-fixed-price contract to provide for 22 Sniper targeting pods and associated support for foreign military sales requirements to Pakistan. At this time, $27.3 million have been obligated. Solicitations began March 2007, negotiations were complete April 2007, and work will be complete December 2010. The Headquarters 542d Combat Sustainment Wing, Robins Air Force Base, GA issued the contract (FA8539-07-C-0009). In its DSCA-anounced requests, Pakistan had requested the pods as a component of its $1.3 billion buy of 60 requested F-16A/B Mid-Life Update (MLU) modification and Falcon Star Structural Service Life Enhancement kits.


http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/200 ... /index.php


Well, for some reason an earlier post of mine was taken down regarding my concern with selling advanced military equipment to Pakistan, and despite similar concernts being raised regarding the prospective sale of the F-22 to countries such as Japan, Australia and especially Israel, with many remarks regarding the reliability of the latter bordering on the insulting and offensive. Be that as it may, I'll let the referenced article speak for itself:

Quote:
Despite the deteriorating security situation in Pakistan, which include an active insurgency, large stretches of the country under de facto al Qaeda rule, visible weakness on the part of Pakistan's leadership within Islamabad itself, and close ties to China; the transfer of advanced US military technology, from F-16 C/Ds to Advanced Hawkeye AWACS radars, to the USA's most modern targeting pods, continues apace.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Asif
PostPosted: May 02, 2007 - 06:51 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Aug 23, 2003
Posts: 1763

Your original post was removed because

1. We don't want a flame war or this topic to go down the wrong route.
2. You insinuated it was a country you were likely to go to war with [future]. Unlikely & the comments in the above 'quote' are factually incorrect in some respects.

Large stretches of Pakistan's countryside are not in the hands of Al-Qaeda. Has the above author of the article referenced been there? Not likely!

_________________
Asif Shamim
F-16.net Editorial staff & Patch Gallery Administration
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Boman
PostPosted: May 02, 2007 - 02:56 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jul 08, 2004
Posts: 635

Status: Offline
Excellent and right on, Asif Thumb

_________________
Best regards
Niels
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
idesof
PostPosted: May 02, 2007 - 04:50 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: May 29, 2006
Posts: 640

Status: Offline
Asif wrote:
Your original post was removed because

1. We don't want a flame war or this topic to go down the wrong route.
2. You insinuated it was a country you were likely to go to war with [future]. Unlikely & the comments in the above 'quote' are factually incorrect in some respects.

Large stretches of Pakistan's countryside are not in the hands of Al-Qaeda. Has the above author of the article referenced been there? Not likely!


That's what I'm talking about! I mean, if folks like you know better, then you can clear up the disinformation. That's often why we have these "discussions," so that the informed may educate the uninformed and then we're all the better for it. What would be your assessment of the claims made in that first paragraph of the article. Obviously you think differently.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: May 02, 2007 - 11:40 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2862

Boman wrote:
Pantera was the offical designation of the export version of the Sniper XR, however it has been dropped and they are all refered to as Sniper now Smile


Thank you Boman. Now I know.

Obviously the potential Heavy Metal reference had to be avoided so as not to make the SNIPER program look bad. Laughing

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel