F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: M904 fuze obsolete? Out of production? - F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-7796-sid-40f569f2b2ab558e0e7964e896fa6bc9.html
Printed on: 18 November 2008

Forum: F-16 Armament & Stores

M904 fuze obsolete? Out of production?



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Leon
PostPosted: Mar 20, 2007 - 01:34 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 20, 2007
Posts: 1

Status: Offline
As a new member from Norway, I would like to post a big hello to you all Razz

Hello!


Ok, enough of the trivia...

I was wondering if any of you guys and girls out there know if M904 is out of production? From what I can read it certainly seems so.

So is there another fuze coming to replace the M904; or do everyone go with FMU-139 nowadays?


Please let me know if you know.


Have fun! Very Happy
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Nov 18, 2008 - 5:42 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





   
 
Slater
PostPosted: Apr 15, 2007 - 05:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Feb 25, 2005
Posts: 31

Status: Offline
I worked with the M904 (and it's tail fuze cousin, the M905) as a Munitions Specialist from 1978 through 1998. The latest-produced M904 I ever saw had a manufacture date of 1974. So I would say that production ceased sometime in the 1970's (as a guess). It's still used widely in training and (presumably) combat but it's place will be taken by the more expensive FMU-139 and FMU-152.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ViperDude
PostPosted: May 07, 2007 - 07:08 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Posts: 141

Status: Offline
M904E4's are still in the USAF inventory, don't know if they are out of production tho and they are managed out of Hill AFB, UT.

Cheers,

ViperDude
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
VarkVet
PostPosted: May 07, 2007 - 07:26 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Oct 30, 2006
Posts: 665

Status: Offline
GFW1 … F-111E … Incirlick … Hung bomb … Aft “T” lug on BRU did not release … front did … arming wire pulled loose … bomb armed … EOD scared and did not know what to do … SRA weapons troop pulled fuse from bomb … situation under control

I don’t think we use mechanical fuses too much these days

Then again I'm a tester ... not a bomber

_________________
My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
eodcheese
PostPosted: May 12, 2007 - 04:38 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Dec 19, 2004
Posts: 3
Location: Aviano AB, Italy
Status: Offline
EOD Scared?? Funny. Probably they assumed the worst (not a bad option) and were going about things a bit slower than you'd like. So your SrA "saved the day" for everyone. Great. There's a "bomb tech" in Turkey whos 'save the day' video is out on the internet and what happened to him? He's dead. Arming wire pulled loose? vanes spinning in the 400 kt breeze? What condition is the fuze in now? Gonna bet your life on the TO that some egghead wrote a few years ago and a few thousand miles away? Scared? hardly... Didn't know what to do? doubtful at best. Not moving fast enough for everyone who watches bomb squad movies and TV shows? probably.

Ref. the original q... To my knowledge, they're not flown as primary fuzes per se, but I have seen them loaded to fill the nose fuze well instead of wasting a madonna plug. They're not hooked up to anything, and not gonna arm up in flight, but they're there for aerodynamics/ballistics I guess.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Slater
PostPosted: May 13, 2007 - 11:10 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Feb 25, 2005
Posts: 31

Status: Offline
Theoretically (according to T.O. 1-1M-34, anyway) thirty revolutions of the arming vane equals one second of arm time with a tolerance of +/- 20%.. Typically they're set for 4 to 6 seconds for F-16/A-10/F-15E aircraft and the like, so it won't take long for a spinning vane to arm the fuze.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel