| Author |
Message |
|
StingerX
|
Posted: Mar 20, 2004 - 08:09 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Mar 20, 2004
Posts: 2
Status: Offline
|
| Just a question about bombing in ccip mode with a dumb bomb like oh a mk. 84 configured for high altitude drop. Does the ccip computation take into to affect the wind? Say through GPS via ground speed vs airspeed and direction? thx in advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Sep 08, 2008 - 8:19 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Frodo
|
Posted: Mar 21, 2004 - 06:54 PM
|
|
|
Frequent Poster

Joined: Feb 10, 2004
Posts: 72
Status: Offline
|
Yes, the system even makes a computer model of the wind changing in altitude. Via the INS (updated by GPS) it has info on the current wind at the flying altitude. Then it starts computing the coriolis force and the tendency of wind to decrease in altitude (Using all kind af tabels depending on latitude, airspeed,...) With all this it makes a rather realistic solution...Off course this is all based on assumptions and calculations, it's still a dumb bomb.
bye |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Stefaan
|
Posted: Mar 21, 2004 - 07:22 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Webmaster

Joined: May 23, 2003
Posts: 1536
Status: Offline
|
Hey Frodo,
I'm surprised to see the Coriolis effect being taken into account. I was under the impression that the coriolis force only had a noticable effect on large-scale phenomena such as weather systems. Shows how accurate those systems are I guess
I was wondering if you have any idea on the influence of the corealis force on the trajectory of a Mk.84 ? (Just curious if you happen to have a ballpark figure, would take to much time to do the calculations
stefaan |
_________________ Stefaan Vanhastel
F-16.net Webmaster.
Last edited by Stefaan on Mar 21, 2004 - 10:11 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
 |
|
StingerX
|
Posted: Mar 21, 2004 - 07:41 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Mar 20, 2004
Posts: 2
Status: Offline
|
| Thank you very much frodo, thats a great help. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Mar 22, 2004 - 02:44 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2833
|
Just to mention, which I am sure you all know. Early Blocks "in the old days" didn't have GPS assist for CCIP.  |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
habu2
|
Posted: Mar 22, 2004 - 03:05 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Sep 05, 2003
Posts: 2804
Location: ACES II
Status: Offline
|
| I'm not so sure CCIP accounts for any Coriolis effects, but the effect is not limited to large weather systems. You can obverve it in your bathroom sink when it drains... |
_________________ Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Frodo
|
Posted: Mar 22, 2004 - 10:30 AM
|
|
|
Frequent Poster

Joined: Feb 10, 2004
Posts: 72
Status: Offline
|
Ok, let me check on that one. I was under the impression that the system makes a realistic 'image' of the entire trajectory including the coriolis force. Just some standard values entered in the system. Wind changes in force and in direction, even when it is only 10-20 degrees it has to be taken in acount. I'm checking this and I will post my answer as soon as possible.
Bye |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Frodo
|
Posted: Mar 22, 2004 - 11:23 AM
|
|
|
Frequent Poster

Joined: Feb 10, 2004
Posts: 72
Status: Offline
|
The system works like this: It knows the wind at flying altitude. It predicts the winds between current altitude and -4000ft (so below ground), It takes 0kts at -4000ft. So in between it calculates a gradual decrease in strenght and direction. The ground is a known value so it can predict the wind at target altitude. The stronger the wind at flying altitude the stronger the wind prediction on the ground. For the correction in direction a bunch of tabels are used because it depends on the latitude, initial velocity of the bomb (and I guess a lot of other factors are being used)...
I didn't had the time to check this info in the books but I used the knowledge of some guys here...Anyone is free to correct the details. (the details!! because the general idea is correct )
Bye guys |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Stefaan
|
Posted: Mar 22, 2004 - 03:23 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Webmaster

Joined: May 23, 2003
Posts: 1536
Status: Offline
|
habu2,
The coriolis effect on bathroom drains was actually a pet peeve from my theoretical mechanics professor at the uni The coriolis force does have an effect on smaller systems, but it's negelectable compared to other factors. In a bathroom sink, major factors contributing to the rotation of the draining water are the physical construction of the drain, followed by convection forces in the water.
So water draining counter-clockwise in the northern hemisphere and clockwise in the southern is an urban myth, except in strictly controlled lab conditions.
http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~dvan ... ewcor.html (section 5.2)
Because of the distances/speeds involved, the effect could be noticable on a Mk.84 trajectory though.
stefaan |
_________________ Stefaan Vanhastel
F-16.net Webmaster.
Last edited by Stefaan on Mar 22, 2004 - 03:39 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Frodo
|
Posted: Mar 22, 2004 - 03:35 PM
|
|
|
Frequent Poster

Joined: Feb 10, 2004
Posts: 72
Status: Offline
|
Stefaan,
It is not the bomb that is influenced by the coriolis force, it is the wind direction! If you have the change look at a wind map displaying the wind in altitude. You can see that the wind is not blowing from the same direction as the wind on the surface (most of the time it is 10-20 degrees but I've seen more). So since the bomb's trajectory is influenced by the wind...The System of the f-16 makes a wind prediction of the bomb on his way down.
I don't think the coriolis force is strong enough to influence a bomb but the wind is a big player.
Greetz
ps: you're correct on the bath experiment |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Cylon
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2004 - 05:17 AM
|
|
|
Veteran

Joined: Dec 09, 2003
Posts: 337
Status: Offline
|
"put the green thingy on the targe thingy, hit the red thingy to make the target thingy go boom."
THAT is how CCIP works
Cylon |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2004 - 09:36 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2833
|
 |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Cylon
|
Posted: Apr 10, 2004 - 04:25 AM
|
|
|
Veteran

Joined: Dec 09, 2003
Posts: 337
Status: Offline
|
Didn't mean to get technical..........
Cylon |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Gums
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2004 - 09:16 PM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Dec 16, 2003
Posts: 798
Status: Offline
|
Heeee aaaahhhh!
Ya gotta love this Cylon dude. He has it right.
As we used to say, "Put the doofer on the ubahunk, and pickle"
On a less serious note, we were all surprised how many variables were incorporated in the F-16 fire control computer compared to the A-7D/E.- no flat earth assumption. Great circle all the time
- rotation of earth under the bomb during its time-of-flight
- coriolis (read bullet above)
- crude assumption of changing winds between release altitude and tgt alt
- GRAVITY delta if tgt was up on a high mountain
All this prolly got us a meter or two better accuracy than the A-7D.
The thing that made the F-16 so good was a better inertial for the short term. In other words, navigation error versus short term drift. The radar ranging was also a big player.
Now for the wind discussion:- bombs don't get blown by the wind. They fall thru the airmass, and if the airmass is moving, big deal. The jet is also flying in that airmass.
- with no atmosphere, a bomb will fall directly below the jet until it hits the ground
- changes in wind between release altitude and tgt alt is neat to talk about, but is not a significant player unless you're dropping a drogue-equipped B-61 (read nuke). Just think about it...... roll a 500 pounder off of a tall building during a hurricane. How many inches do you think that sucker will be blown by the wind?
- air slows down the bomb due to friction/drag. Hence, the bomb will hit behind the jet in the airmass. This is called 'trail'. When the jet is 'tracking' toward the tgt in a crosswind, then the bomb will hit behind the jet AND 'downwind' with respect to the inertial/geodetic frame of reference. In the airmass, it will only intersect tgt alt directly behind the jet. Trail is a biggie for a very high altitude release, like 20000 feet. It is also a biggie for high-drag ord like the big munition dispensers, drogue nukes, etc. It isn't more than a few meters for a 5000 foot release of a 'slick' bomb.
later, |
_________________ Gums
Viper pilot '79
"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2004 - 09:44 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2833
|
| I always like the way you compare the A-7 to the F-16... of course from your flying experence... but also where the torch was passed from the most accurate single seat day bomber ( A-7 ) to a slightly better one ( the early F-16 ). |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|