F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: Oregon ANG Lobbies For F-22 - F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-7605-view-previous-sid-2a0f53432c5e0d7f3de5a52fe769971e.html
Printed on: 11 October 2008

Forum: F-22A Raptor

Oregon ANG Lobbies For F-22



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
VuijkT
PostPosted: Mar 10, 2008 - 01:28 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Posts: 43
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Status: Offline
Who thinks they should get them and why?
I personally think they should get them, the F-22 is a awesome aircraft (The Viper still rules btw Wink ). And the commander is right, as a commander you always need to try to get the best equipment for your troops.

Tim

_________________
Give me kinetic energy any day and I'll take his potential energy and shove it up his a$$!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Oct 11, 2008 - 10:40 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor






This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
   
 
C-Bass06
PostPosted: Mar 10, 2008 - 12:57 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Posts: 56
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
I personally think that the raptor is just too pricey for a guard unit. Correct me if I'm wrong...but the only guard units that operate the F-22 are attached to active units like at Langley, etc. I think guard units should look for an affordable airframe with plenty of versatility, like the F-35, so they can stretch their dollar a little further. That's why so many guard units have the viper...it's relatively cheap and very effective.

_________________
"Their lives are our business"
SrA Andrew, 112th FS
Aircrew Life Support
2006- Present
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
checksixx
PostPosted: Mar 10, 2008 - 03:28 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1034

Status: Offline
Correct, the only Guard unit operating the Raptor right now is the Virginia Air Guard, now based at Langley. They can put in a request for the jets, with reasoning, but the Air Force has already road mapped basing for most aircraft. I think the request could generate a stronger push for more airframes with the powers that be, if the wording is right.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SixerViper
PostPosted: Mar 10, 2008 - 04:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Jun 05, 2007
Posts: 349

Status: Offline
Be careful what you wish for regarding F-22s. No ANG unit is gonna get 'em without going to Associate Wing status and that isn't good for the guard unit. Rumour has it that the Langley AD toads won't even let the VaANG fly their jets on ANG drill weekends. And ALL the jets there say "FF" on the tails; NONE say "VA". Only one has "192FW" painted on its tail. So much for unit pride...

If I were an ANG F-16 unit commander I'd be lobbying for F-35s.

_________________
F-106A/B '69-'73
F-105D/F '73-'81
A-7D/K '81-'91
F-16C/D '91-'05
SCUBA bum '05-Present
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ACMIguy
PostPosted: Mar 10, 2008 - 07:42 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Posts: 667

Status: Offline
SixerViper wrote:
Be careful what you wish for regarding F-22s. No ANG unit is gonna get 'em without going to Associate Wing status and that isn't good for the guard unit. Rumour has it that the Langley AD toads won't even let the VaANG fly their jets on ANG drill weekends. And ALL the jets there say "FF" on the tails; NONE say "VA". Only one has "192FW" painted on its tail. So much for unit pride...

If I were an ANG F-16 unit commander I'd be lobbying for F-35s.


I agree Thumb
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Mar 11, 2008 - 12:59 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Posts: 743

Status: Offline
ACMIguy wrote:
SixerViper wrote:
If I were an ANG F-16 unit commander I'd be lobbying for F-35s.


I agree Thumb


Three... Thumb
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
checksixx
PostPosted: Mar 11, 2008 - 01:24 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1034

Status: Offline
SixerViper wrote:
And ALL the jets there say "FF" on the tails; NONE say "VA". Only one has "192FW" painted on its tail. So much for unit pride...

If I were an ANG F-16 unit commander I'd be lobbying for F-35s.


We've already covered in another thread that "FF" is a base code, nothing more. I'm sure the VA ANG folks have plenty of unit pride regardless of what is on the jets. I do agree on the F-35 idea though...the chances are MUCH higher in that respect.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Corsair1963
PostPosted: Mar 11, 2008 - 05:52 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 670

Status: Offline
I don't see the USAF getting many more F-22's past the currently projected 183 aircraft. So, all I can say to Oregon ANG is "good luck"! Doh


So, I guess that makes me number four.........one more vote for the F-35 Lightning! Not Worthy
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Siesta
PostPosted: Mar 11, 2008 - 09:30 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: May 02, 2004
Posts: 108

Status: Offline
You guys already forgot that the Hawaii ANG is slated to receive F-22s and the active duty squadron will be the associate unit ... while Langley and Elmendorf jets belong to the active duty unit and the ang/reserve are the associate unit at Hickam it will be the opposite.. the jets belong to the guard while the active duty "borrows" them out.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
checksixx
PostPosted: Mar 11, 2008 - 02:27 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1034

Status: Offline
Nope, I don't think anyone forgot that...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
geogen
PostPosted: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:44 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 11, 2008
Posts: 430

Status: Offline
Hi, 16.net is the best, glad to be here.. (I'm nyetnonnein on YT, btw)

Wow, now the F-22 is going to replace F-16s and F-117s on top of F-15s? Someone better start cloning Raptors.

To offer a solution to the base commander's conundrum though.. given that F-35s for him might be another 6-7 yrs away, how about 'lobby' to lease new Block 60, or same configuartion as India's requirements, which could be sold abroad later?

_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Mar 11, 2008 - 11:04 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Posts: 743

Status: Offline
geogen wrote:
given that F-35s for him might be another 6-7 yrs away, how about 'lobby' to lease new Block 60, or same configuartion as India's requirements, which could be sold abroad later?


The USAF/ANG/Res has no infrastructure/logistics for the F-16E/F Vipers. E/F have almost all new systems, and an engine not procured by the US DoD. Big No No

A better option would be leasing C/D Block 50/52+ which seem to be more the flavor being sold at LM. Current infrastructure/logistics are in the system to support these aircraft and engines for decades to come.

Block 52+ would be the best bet for follow-on sales. Most FMS countries have purchased the 52+ lately and would be ripe to pick up some "slightly used" Vipers in say 10-12 years... Two Cents

BUT; The USAF won't buy (or lease) any "legacy fighters" as they may cut into the Raptor / Lightening II budget. Slap

Block 60 jets are rather "special"; United Arab Emirates paid for the cost to develop the aircraft, and purchased 80 which is a rather limited number compared to around 1000 Block 50/52 Vipers. Rolling Eyes
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Corsair1963
PostPosted: Mar 12, 2008 - 06:44 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 670

Status: Offline
Sorry, but the USAF and USN need to forget about purchasing more Super Hornet or Vipers. The future is the F-22 and F-35. Buying more 4th Generation Types just increases the cost of the latter two! If, anything more Raptors need to be purchased in the short-term and Lightning Productions needs to be accelerated! Salute
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
geogen
PostPosted: Mar 12, 2008 - 08:56 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 11, 2008
Posts: 430

Status: Offline
Thanks for informative reply Engine guy. Corsair, I hear ya. But... IMO the costs of F-35 and/or F-22 will increase without any regard to how few or no new legacy procurement at all. In life you pay taxes, die and costs of fighters increase. In fact, for argument sake it could be an incentive and healthy, for future manufacture of aircraft models under better management/planning, etc, if USAF today started to lobby for FEWER F-35 e.g., and requested investment for say, new block 60/XL infrastructure/logistics to incorporate such interim fighter upgrades as a result of delays and unknowns of costs and congressional support for JSF numbers! E.G. Latest report was $1 trillion estimate now for total US-portion of F-35 program costs. Something is going to give soon.

So just a thought I'm throwing out, and I truly don't know what I'm talking about, just feel I get lucky once and awhile going with my gut, you know On Topic <--------- But at least I try to!!

_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel