| Author |
Message |
|
lu
|
Posted: Jul 25, 2007 - 05:14 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Posts: 24
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2008 - 5:12 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Jul 25, 2007 - 04:45 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2862
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lodni_Kranazon
|
Posted: Jul 26, 2007 - 02:49 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 18, 2007
Posts: 51
Location: NAF ATSUGI, JAPAN
Status: Offline
|
| "Optimist by nature" Some would say that's just plain FOOLISH to beleive the Chinese have benign intentions. I wonder if the Army & Navy head honchos in Hawaii in 1941 were optimists, too. If Japan can afford them, I say sell 'em as many as they want. |
_________________ AKA "Papa Smurf"
VFA-27 "Royal Maces"
NAF Atsugi, Japan
|
|
|
|
 |
|
AussieLightning
|
Posted: Jul 26, 2007 - 04:05 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 06, 2007
Posts: 24
Status: Offline
|
Leaving aside the technology transfer issues, which I'm sure could be worked out through the LOEXCOM given the political will, I can't think of a country whose requirements are more suited to the Raptor's capabilities than Japan.
Quote:
Interesting... that same guy wanted to help China build an aircraft carrier.
http://www.gertzfile.com/gertzfile/ring060107.html
Am I missing something? What possible benefit would helping China build an aircraft carrier be to the US? Why not sell them some B-1's from the Boneyard to replace their Badgers, too? Pardon my Australian, but bloody ridiculous. |
_________________ "For a plane to fly well, it must be beautiful."-Marcel Dassault.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
bdn12
|
Posted: Jul 26, 2007 - 04:33 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 38
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Jul 26, 2007 - 08:25 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2862
|
| Thanks for the link Bdn. |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sferrin
|
Posted: Jul 26, 2007 - 12:53 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 1088
Status: Offline
|
| Sad thing is I'd wager the reason for the democrat-controlled congress enforcing the ban is more about making sure the F-22 is dead, dead, DEAD once the 183 have been bought. If they get their way they'd probably want to destroy all the tooling too so "it couldn't fall into the wrong hands". |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Jul 26, 2007 - 01:21 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2862
|
| More about keeping China happy $$$$$$$$ |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Corsair1963
|
Posted: Jul 27, 2007 - 06:05 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 805
Status: Offline
|
Its just Politics......................Admiral Keating is not directing his comments toward Japan but China! Further, Congress didn't say Japan could not ever have the F-22. Just not during FY 08..........in Politics you have to learn to "read" between the lines! Trust me when we get closer to the closing of F-22 Production Lines. Things will get interesting.............Personally, I still believe Japan will get the Raptor.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
checksixx
|
Posted: Jul 27, 2007 - 01:07 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1035
Status: Offline
|
| Its not up to the PACOM CC anyways, so whats the big deal. He shared his opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
beepa
|
Posted: Jul 28, 2007 - 08:19 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 05, 2007
Posts: 41
Status: Offline
|
Hey,I just read on Yahoo News that Israel has asked for the Raptor.Is this true and if so what are their chances of getting some?[Without stealing them ]Would it mean that if Israel gets the Raptor then the shop is open to everybody[i.e. trusted allies]? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
bdn12
|
Posted: Jul 28, 2007 - 11:00 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 38
Status: Offline
|
| I read that article. They asked for the Raptor a few months ago when we thought it was going to be exported, so it's not really new news. I assume you read the article about the Saudi arms deal of $20 billion. They mentioned the F-22 because it said the U.S. would assure Israel it would maintain a qualitative edge over Arab countries. Since the F-22 has been banned from export again, I think that Israel will end up getting the F-35. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Roscoe
|
Posted: Jul 29, 2007 - 01:02 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jun 29, 2004
Posts: 988
Status: Offline
|
|
checksixx wrote:
Its not up to the PACOM CC anyways, so whats the big deal. He shared his opinion.
The theater commanders have quite a bit of say in this actually...as an export policy advisor I was required to vet any new policy to the theater staffs. If one said no, I'd better have a damn good reason to recommend otherwise in my SSS. |
_________________ Roscoe
<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
|
|
|
|
 |
|
checksixx
|
Posted: Jul 29, 2007 - 07:38 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1035
Status: Offline
|
| Not on technology export they don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
bdn12
|
Posted: Jul 30, 2007 - 06:04 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 38
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|