| Author |
Message |
|
Diving`Falcon
|
 Posted: Feb 11, 2007 - 04:59 PM
|
 
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jan 28, 2007 - 10:58 AM
Posts: 10
Status: Offline
|
Hi
I just want to know that Which one is better..Falcon4.0 allied force or Lock on?? i already playing Falcon4.0 allied force it is good but i want to purchase Lock on so please paste ur comments about lock on
Thanks |
_________________
The~Diving~Falcon
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 21, 2013 - 2:20 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
seat_dreamer
|
|
Posted: Feb 11, 2007 - 06:01 PM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Apr 08, 2006 - 05:49 PM
Posts: 278
Location: Athens, Greece
Status: Offline
|
| Falcon series is heaps better than LOMAC in terms of realism, and it sports a great dynamic campaign, but lack the diversity of aircraft (AF at least) and have much more dated graphics. It always depends what you want to go for. |
_________________
"144-0 kill ratio.....Ok 144-1 but that's 1 compared to your entire airforce."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diving`Falcon
|
|
Posted: Feb 12, 2007 - 07:35 AM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jan 28, 2007 - 10:58 AM
Posts: 10
Status: Offline
|
Oh ic so LOMAC is good but not as good as falcon 4.0 allied force ok got u |
_________________
The~Diving~Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scandinavian
|
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2007 - 08:50 PM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 09, 2003 - 10:00 PM
Posts: 10
Location: Bergen, Norway/Bodø, Norway
Status: Offline
|
| Only place I find LOMAC better is in the graphics area.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Viper150
|
|
Posted: May 05, 2007 - 03:28 AM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Mar 06, 2007 - 11:21 PM
Posts: 17
Status: Offline
|
| Falcon 4.0 Allied Force for sure! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMVI_Catu
|
|
Posted: Jun 13, 2007 - 01:05 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 13, 2007 - 12:24 AM
Posts: 22
Status: Offline
|
Falcon 4.0 Allied Force is a good software but you can have more realism with Open Falcon that have more realistic avionics (and more complex...)
Information in Global Falcon Comunity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
airwinx
|
|
Posted: Aug 31, 2007 - 08:41 AM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Aug 27, 2007 - 04:31 AM
Posts: 13
Status: Offline
|
| Is the Global Falcon used for Falcon 4 Allied Forces add-on??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FlightDreamz
|
|
Posted: Oct 15, 2007 - 04:51 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Aug 18, 2007 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 646
Location: Long Island, New York
Status: Offline
|
It depends on your computer setup and your personal tastes. They're both good flight simulators - Lock On: Modern Air Combat has better graphics in my opinion. But a result of that is that it will bring a lot of PC's to a crawl. Falcon: Allied Force could do that too if you don't meet at least the minimum requirements but not at much.
Falcon 4.0 is better for the F-16 fan and for those who are going for the best accuracy. Lock On is better for fans of aircraft (not necessary just the F-16) and for those looking for the best graphics (not that Falcon: Allied Force graphics are BAD in any way mind you). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parkeran
|
|
Posted: Mar 23, 2008 - 02:14 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Jul 17, 2007 - 11:22 AM
Posts: 144
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
|
| I would say Falcon 4.0 Allied Forces. It is a great game and easy to install. Though it takes some getting used to. |
_________________
Parkeran
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bushmaster78FS
|
|
Posted: May 07, 2008 - 01:20 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Feb 22, 2006 - 04:03 PM
Posts: 522
Location: Enterprise, AL
Status: Offline
|
| You don't fly a VIPER in LOMAC. Enough said! |
_________________
SEMPER VIPER
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cali
|
|
Posted: Oct 20, 2008 - 12:16 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 30, 2008 - 07:52 PM
Posts: 50
Status: Offline
|
| The graphics in Falcon series suck, downloading open falcon as I type I hope it's better the F4. Lock on is very nice, but they only have a F-15C and a A-10. I would love it if they had a viper. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bushmaster78FS
|
|
Posted: Oct 21, 2008 - 12:37 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Feb 22, 2006 - 04:03 PM
Posts: 522
Location: Enterprise, AL
Status: Offline
|
|
Cali wrote:
The graphics in Falcon series suck, downloading open falcon as I type I hope it's better the F4. Lock on is very nice, but they only have a F-15C and a A-10. I would love it if they had a viper.
There is not much change in the graphics area of OpenFalcon, maybe much newer models compared to original F4. But OpenFalcon is not a sim you would fly for its graphics. Realism is top notch... |
_________________
SEMPER VIPER
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cali
|
|
Posted: Oct 28, 2008 - 10:26 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 30, 2008 - 07:52 PM
Posts: 50
Status: Offline
|
| It's not too bad, it was years ago when I 1st tried it. This time it seems to look better, I do have hitiles install and I didn't before so maybe that's it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rixile
|
|
Posted: Nov 05, 2008 - 07:59 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 05, 2008 - 07:38 AM
Posts: 30
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pilotasso
|
|
Posted: Dec 03, 2008 - 01:05 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Oct 29, 2006 - 03:35 AM
Posts: 528
Status: Offline
|
The successor to Lockon (a survey SIM) ,is DCS Black shark (high fidelity study SIM) wich will have several expansion modules, one of them will be DCS: F-16Falcon. Expect to see a fully clickable cockpit, advanced avionics, flight and damage models (including for all ordenance and sensors), just like the currently released KA-50 quality standarts. Whats even more exciting is that there will be several other aircraft with the same depth of realism and to be playable also online that will provide awsome DACT (something we already have even though with some quirks in LOCKON).
This is going to be the real deal, not one of those Fan made projects.
http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/
Cant wait.
Falcon 4 was a good avionics SIM but its days are numbered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
