| Author |
Message |
|
ultor
|
 Posted: Mar 25, 2010 - 11:06 PM
|
 
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 08:43 PM
Posts: 147
|
It seems only naive kids can play with such unrealistic toys like FC2 and assume this is some real flight-sim. Go to ED E-toyshop and beware on MiG-29UFO, kid!  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 27, 2012 - 1:05 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
ultor
|
|
Posted: Mar 31, 2010 - 01:38 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 08:43 PM
Posts: 147
|
| Have you shot down another 1000 planes yet, Pilotasso? How many of them were stealth planes? Do you have any valuable tips for PAK-FA designers? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cali
|
|
Posted: Jun 13, 2010 - 09:08 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 30, 2008 - 07:52 PM
Posts: 50
Status: Offline
|
| ultor, what are you complaining about? Are you talking about how much better F4 is compared to Lock on? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pilotasso
|
|
Posted: Jun 19, 2010 - 01:08 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Oct 29, 2006 - 03:35 AM
Posts: 528
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pilotasso
|
|
Posted: Jun 30, 2010 - 10:54 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Oct 29, 2006 - 03:35 AM
Posts: 528
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
exorcet
|
|
Posted: Jul 01, 2010 - 04:01 AM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Oct 07, 2009 - 04:35 PM
Posts: 137
Location: US
Status: Offline
|
Looks great, but I'm going to have to pass it for one of the later DCS fighter releases.
As far as the original topic goes, I find both Falcon 4.0 AF and FC2 worth owning. I can't get Falcon to work online, and although offline missions are arguably more realistic overall, human pilots far outpace AI. Falcon is definitely more realistic, but it's more from procedure/immersion than actual physics/combat. They are both pretty even in that regard. Though I hear OF has much more to offer in terms of avionics, but I can't get it as I don't have the original non AF Falcon 4.0. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
madrat
|
|
Posted: Jul 01, 2010 - 04:59 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Mar 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 739
Status: Offline
|
| I prefer Agile Warrior F-111X. Smart bombs FTW. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pilotasso
|
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2010 - 07:03 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Oct 29, 2006 - 03:35 AM
Posts: 528
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
lampshade111
|
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2010 - 08:03 PM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Sep 22, 2008 - 03:17 AM
Posts: 191
Status: Offline
|
| I am looking foward to the A-10C DCS, but I sure wish they could release aircraft at a faster rate even if it means you can't press 50 different buttons just to start up the engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FlightDreamz
|
|
Posted: Jul 03, 2010 - 06:28 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Aug 18, 2007 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 591
Location: Long Island, New York
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
lampshade111
I am looking foward to the A-10C DCS, but I sure wish they could release aircraft at a faster rate even if it means you can't press 50 different buttons just to start up the engine.
LOL!  There are many (at least some on this board) who would disagree with you on that (accuracy is part of the attraction of the flight simulator)! But I hear what you're saying - I used to love the old Janes F-15, and other Janes Combat sim's, because you could dial back the accuracy settings to suit your tastes (or skill level). |
_________________
A fighter without a gun . . . is like an airplane without a wing.— Brigadier General Robin Olds, USAF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
