F-16 Reference
5th Gen Fighters
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Gamera
|
Posted: Feb 26, 2007 - 03:50 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: May 23, 2005 - 08:54 AM
Posts: 587
Status: Offline
|
] On the light side, that bug could keep Japan from ever using the F-22 to attack Hawaii again.
Incidentally, before and during WWII, the Imperial Jap military used US aircraft, and not as captured aircraft.
The IJN Shouwa L2D Type 0 transport plane, nicknamed Tabby by Allies, was a license-produced DC-3 / C-47 with domestic engines.
51 of up to 496 of them survived WWII.
http://www.skynet-1.com/navy/07.html
has a photo at
http://www.skynet-1.com/navy/photo/l2d2.jpg
(I was at a model shop last week during the Chinese New Year holidays, and saw an aircraft model box (by Hasegawa) with a familiar appearance, but a Jap name, and thought it was a post-WWII import.
Another item I learnt from gawking at the model boxes was the Number 3 "Tako" air-to-air bomb (yes, bomb, not rocket) used by the Jap Zero fighters at Rabaul and Solomons.) |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Feb 12, 2012 - 1:42 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
J.J.
|
Posted: Feb 27, 2007 - 10:21 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 20, 2005 - 09:12 PM
Posts: 2207
Status: Offline
|
"Daily Tech" reported:
Quote:
Lockheed's F-22 Raptor Gets Zapped by International Date Line
Brandon Hill
February 26, 2007 10:28 AM
Six Lockheed F-22 Raptors have Y2K-esque glitch of their own over the Pacific
Lockheed’s F-22 Raptor is the most advanced fighter in the world with its stealth capabilities, advanced radar, state of the art weapons systems and ultra-efficient turbofans which allow the F-22 to "supercruise" at supersonic speeds without an afterburner. The Raptor has gone up against the best that the US Air Force and Navy has to offer taking out F-15s, F-16s and F/A-18 Super Hornets during simulated war games in Alaska. The Raptor-led "Blue Air" team was able to rack up an impressive 241-to-2 kill ratio during the exercise against the "Red Air" threat -- the two kills on the blue team were from the 30-year old F-15 teammates and not the new Raptors.
But while the simulated war games were a somewhat easy feat for the Raptor, something more mundane was able to cripple six aircraft on a 12 to 15 hours flight from Hawaii to Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, Japan. The U.S. Air Force's mighty Raptor was felled by the International Date Line (IDL).
When the group of Raptors crossed over the IDL, multiple computer systems crashed on the planes. Everything from fuel subsystems, to navigation and partial communications were completely taken offline. Numerous attempts were made to "reboot" the systems to no avail.
Luckily for the Raptors, there were no weather issues that day so visibility was not a problem. Also, the Raptors had their refueling tankers as guide dogs to "carry" them back to safety. "They needed help. Had they gotten separated from their tankers or had the weather been bad, they had no attitude reference. They had no communications or navigation," said Retired Air Force Major General Don Shepperd. "They would have turned around and probably could have found the Hawaiian Islands. But if the weather had been bad on approach, there could have been real trouble."
"The tankers brought them back to Hawaii. This could have been real serious. It certainly could have been real serious if the weather had been bad," Shepperd continued. "It turned out OK. It was fixed in 48 hours. It was a computer glitch in the millions of lines of code, somebody made an error in a couple lines of the code and everything goes."
Luckily for the pilots behind the controls of the Raptors, they were not involved in a combat situation. Had they been, it could have been a disastrous folly by the U.S. Air Force to have to admit that their aircraft which cost $125+ million USD apiece were knocked out of the sky due to a few lines of computer code. "And luckily this time we found out about it before combat. We got it fixed with tiger teams in about 48 hours and the airplanes were flying again, completed their deployment. But this could have been real serious in combat," said Shepperd.
<a href="http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=6225#cmt111649
">Story link</a>
You can also watch their comments thread:
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?n ... #cmt111649
Note: In "Daily Tech´s" news article the words "something more mundane was able to cripple six aircraft" are hot-linked to their primary CNN source:
Quote:
THIS WEEK AT WAR
Week's War-Related Activities Recounted
Aired February 24, 2007 - 19:00 ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
[...] It is a busy week so we have called out some of the best. Arwa Damon on the chemical attacks in Baghdad, Major General Don Shepperd reveals problems was the F-22 stealth fighter and Jamie McIntyre with the embarrassing conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. THIS WEEK AT WAR. [...]
[...] ROBERTS [John Roberts, CNN Anchor - J.J.]: Twenty five years from development to deployment, the F-22 Raptor is the most advanced fighting machine in the air. But it was no match for a computer glitch that left six of them high above the Pacific Ocean, deaf, dumb and blind as they headed to their first deployment. So what happened? We turn to a man who's at home in the cockpit, Retired Air Force Major General Don Shepperd. Don, let me set the scene. These F-22s, eight of them, were headed from Hickam (ph) Air Force base in Hawaii to an (INAUDIBLE) Air Force base in Japan. They were approaching the international date line, pick it up from there.
SHEPPERD [Maj. Gen. Don Shepperd (retired), CNN Military Analyst - J.J.]: You got it right Don. You want everything to go right with your frontline fighter, $125, $135 million to copy. The F-22 Raptor is our frontline fighter, air defense, air superiority. It also can drop bombs. It is stealthy. It's fast and you want it all to go right on your first deployment to the Pacific and it didn't. At the international date line, whoops, all systems dumped and when I say all systems, I mean all systems, their navigation, part of their communications, their fuel systems. They were -- they could have been in real trouble. They were with their tankers. The tankers - they tried to reset their systems, couldn't get them reset. The tankers brought them back to Hawaii. This could have been real serious. It certainly could have been real serious if the weather had been bad. It turned out OK. It was fixed in 48 hours. It was a computer glitch in the millions of lines of code, somebody made an error in a couple lines of the code and everything goes.
ROBERTS: This is almost like the feared Y2K problem that happened to these aircraft. We should point out that computers control almost every aspect of this aircraft, from their weapons systems, to the flight controls and the computers absolutely went haywire, became useless.
SHEPPERD: Absolutely. When you think of airplanes from the old days, with cables and that type of thing and direct connections between the sticks and the yolks and the controls, not that way anymore. Everything is by computer. When your computers go, your airplanes go. You have multiple systems. When they all dump at the same time, you can be in real trouble. Luckily this turned out OK.
ROBERTS: What would have happened General Shepperd if these brand-new $120 million F-22s had been going into battle?
SHEPPERD: You would have been in real trouble in the middle of combat. The good thing is that we found this out. Any time -- before, you know, before we get into combat with an airplane like this. Any time you introduce a new airplane, you are going to find glitches and you are going to find things that go wrong. It happens in our civilian airliners. You just don't hear much about it but these things absolutely happen. And luckily this time we found out about it before combat. We got it fixed with tiger teams in about 48 hours and the airplanes were flying again, completed their deployment. But this could have been real serious in combat.
ROBERTS: So basically you had these advanced air -- not just superiority but air supremacy fighters that were in there, up there in the air, above the Pacific Ocean, not much more sophisticated than a little Cessna 152 only with a jet engine.
SHEPPERD: You got it. They are on a 12 to 15-hour flight from Hawaii to Okinawa, but all their systems dumped. They needed help. Had they gotten separated from their tankers or had the weather been bad, they had no attitude reference. They had no communications or navigation. They would have turned around and probably could have found the Hawaiian Islands. But if the weather had been bad on approach, there could have been real trouble. Again, you get refueling from your tankers. You don't run -- you don't get yourself where you run out of fuel. You always have enough fuel and refueling nine, 10, 11, 12 times on a flight like this where you can get somewhere to land. But again, attitude reference and navigation are essential as is communication. In this case all of that was affected. It was a serious problem.
ROBERTS: So the fact the computers run so much of the systems on these aircraft, General Shepperd, is the -- is the military at risk of over engineering here so if they did have a problem like that when they were going into a hostile situation, they could be, as you said, repeatedly in real trouble?
SHEPPERD: Well, you have redundant systems but it's just a fact of life in the modern computer age. By the way John, you are going to have the same problem coming up on your laptop computer as we conferred from -- from standard time from daylight savings time to standard time. Your program -- your computer is programmed for one thing and we have changed the dates and you are going to have a problem. It's going to have to be dealt with.
ROBERTS: Do me a favor Don. Make sure I'm not on my laptop computer when I'm flying in an F-22 on that day.
SHEPPERD: Absolutely. [...]
<a href="http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0702/24/tww.01.html">Current full CNN transcript</a>
Question to idesof: Is that the same stuff what you already watched on CNN in Wolf Blitzer's "Situation Room" (your post from February 24, 2007 - 11:27 PM)? |
_________________ Joachim Jacob
http://warthognews.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
 |
|
checksixx
|
Posted: Feb 27, 2007 - 11:12 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 20, 2005 - 05:28 AM
Posts: 1140
Status: Offline
|
| Wow...that confirms to me that Don has no idea what he's talking about when it comes to Raptor's. I love how they interject that he's 'at home in the cockpit'...Funny, as he has never flown anything that advanced...Again...I hate how much CNN hypes everything up to make it into news...Check |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
idesof
|
Posted: Feb 28, 2007 - 03:14 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: May 29, 2006 - 11:59 PM
Posts: 638
Status: Offline
|
|
J.J. wrote:
Question to idesof: Is that the same stuff what you already watched on CNN in Wolf Blitzer's "Situation Room" (your post from February 24, 2007 - 11:27 PM)?
Yeah... same crap.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Raptor_claw
|
Posted: Feb 28, 2007 - 03:57 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 08:11 AM
Posts: 277
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
THIS WEEK AT WAR
Week's War-Related Activities Recounted
Aired February 24, 2007 - 19:00 ET
SHEPPERD [Maj. Gen. Don Shepperd (retired), CNN Military Analyst - J.J.]: At the international date line, whoops, all systems dumped and when I say all systems, I mean all systems, their navigation, part of their communications, their fuel systems. .... It was a computer glitch in the millions of lines of code, somebody made an error in a couple lines of the code and everything goes.
Okay, Don, I'm gonna give you a second to rethink your answer. Are you sure 'all systems dumped'???? Oh, yeah, and 'everything goes', you wouldn't want to retract that now, would ya????
No?
Well then, Don, I'm sure you are aware (you are the 'expert' after all) that the F-22 is an aerodynamically unstable platform, and that if 'all' systems dumped ('everything', that is), that would include the computers running the control laws which (as you know) provide artificial stability and keep the pointy end pointed forward. So, when 'everything' went, the aircraft departed from controlled flight and either broke apart or just spiralled into the ocean (within a matter of seconds)?
Hmm.... That didn't happen, you say???? Curious.
Maybe the reason that didn't happen is that you don't have a clue about what you are talking about. Maybe you just enjoy making entertaining and inflammatory (and wrong and misleading) statements to the national media.
Nahhh. Surely not. I'm sure you were just misinformed....
(okay, rant complete)
Turns out that flight critical software (such as the control laws) is tested to a higher standard, so that there are no 'glitches' that will crash the airplane. But let's not cloud the issue with facts. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
parrothead
|
Posted: Feb 28, 2007 - 07:43 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 11, 2004 - 12:04 AM
Posts: 3280
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
...their fuel systems...
I want one of those fuel systems in my car ! When it hits the fan, they keep on going .
Wonder how they ever made it back to base ...
[/sarcasm] |
_________________ No plane on Sunday, maybe be one come Monday...
www.parrotheadjeff.com
|
|
|
|
 |
|
akruse21
|
Posted: Feb 28, 2007 - 09:35 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jul 30, 2005 - 12:38 PM
Posts: 811
Status: Offline
|
| I think the fuel gauges did go though. If i remember right from fencecheck. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lieven
|
Posted: Feb 28, 2007 - 08:47 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Webmaster

Joined: May 23, 2003 - 04:44 PM
Posts: 2825
|
Note that I just posted the article "<a href="news_article2210.html">U.S. Air Force fixes computer glitches in 87 F-22s</a>"
Quote:
The U.S. Air Force on Tuesday said it is fixing technological glitches in roughly 87 F-22 fighters after several aircraft computer systems were disabled earlier this month during a test flight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
PhillyGuy
|
Posted: Feb 28, 2007 - 10:13 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 04:07 AM
Posts: 478
Status: Offline
|
I wonder where I can get a phone service and system this reliable and capable...
Quote:
One pilot was able to contact contractor Lockheed Martin to troubleshoot the error during the flight, the Air Force said.
Source
Also the tech support guys and ground crews did a great job, they found, fixed and tested the problem in 48 hours half a world away from their home base, I can't even get my car fixed that fast. |
_________________ "Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
J.J.
|
Posted: Feb 28, 2007 - 10:55 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 20, 2005 - 09:12 PM
Posts: 2207
Status: Offline
|
The name of the "Air Force Colonel" who talked to the press (at least according to AP) is unknown to me. And neither USAF nor ACC or PACAF released additional related news on their public websites.
So I hope, during the next weeks we will get some official info from USAF or Lockheed Martin. But currently, I still await any proof for the arrival of the two remaining Raptors at Kadena AB.
Note that "The Air Force on Tuesday said it is fixing technological glitches in roughly 87 F-22 Raptor fighter jets", that wold mean that All Raptors from 4001 as the first flyable test aircraft to 4087 (Lot 5) as the latest known production aircraft are involved? That's very questionable to me. Anybody who can/will explain some more verified facts & figures? |
_________________ Joachim Jacob
http://warthognews.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
 |
|
checksixx
|
Posted: Mar 01, 2007 - 03:18 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 20, 2005 - 05:28 AM
Posts: 1140
Status: Offline
|
|
J.J. wrote:
But currently, I still await any proof for the arrival of the two remaining Raptors at Kadena AB.
You mean the two that landed at Wake? They were only there for a very short time...all the Raptor's are at Kadena...have been for a bit now.
Check |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
J.J.
|
Posted: Mar 03, 2007 - 08:45 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 20, 2005 - 09:12 PM
Posts: 2207
Status: Offline
|
From the topic "F-22 Raptor serial numbers":
turugi-geki wrote:
Serial number of F-22 which flew to the Kadena AFB in Japan
18WG 27EFS F-22A Raptor S/N
AF-03-047 2007/02/18 marked 27th FS
AF-03-048 2007/02/21
AF-03-049 2007/02/17
AF-03-050 2007/02/21
AF-03-051 2007/02/17
AF-03-052 2007/02/18
AF-03-060 2007/02/18
AF-03-061 2007/02/18 marked 1st FW
AF-04-064 2007/02/18
AF-04-065 2007/02/18
AF-04-066 2007/02/18 94FS
AF-04-078 2007/02/18 94FS
|
_________________ Joachim Jacob
http://warthognews.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
 |
|
J.J.
|
Posted: Mar 21, 2007 - 09:46 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 20, 2005 - 09:12 PM
Posts: 2207
Status: Offline
|
Today, Defense Visual Information Center (DVIC) released the first "real" deployment shots (from U.S. Navy photographers) of a 27th EFS Raptor, currently deployed to Kadena AB, Japan. I uploaded the following two "best shots":
 F-22A no. 03-4052 from the 27 EFS, deployed to Kadena AB, an F/A-18E Super Hornet from VFA-115, an F-15C Eagle from 44 FS and an F/A-18C Hornet from VFA-25 fly in formation during joint exercises between the USN and the USAF in the Philippine Sea on March 16th, 2007.
Invalid image size
Note: DVIC´s website is very inconsistent. After downloading the hi-res files for first time, I´m currently not able to download they again to make links to the hi-res versions (about 5 MB each!). Please await an update. |
_________________ Joachim Jacob
http://warthognews.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
 |
|
J.J.
|
Posted: Apr 04, 2007 - 10:46 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 20, 2005 - 09:12 PM
Posts: 2207
Status: Offline
|
Latest related shot from USAF´s public main website:
 Alex Trebek, host of the "Jeopardy" television game show, sits in F-22A Raptor #03-4047, deployed from the 27th FS, at Kadena AB on March 31st, 2007, as SSgt. Michael Mauriello and TSgt. Chris McEwan (both from the 27th FS) explain the Raptors cockpit instruments. Trebek and his show staff visited Kadena AB on a two-day trip during an USO tour.
<a href="http://www.af.mil/shared/media/photodb/photos/070331-F-1540F-200.jpg">hi-res</a> |
_________________ Joachim Jacob
http://warthognews.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Scorpion1alpha
|
Posted: Apr 07, 2007 - 04:17 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Oct 21, 2005 - 01:47 AM
Posts: 1293
Status: Offline
|
| Sorry, but ALEX TREBEK!?!?!? |
_________________ I'm watching...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|