| Author |
Message |
|
Bilal_Khan
|
Posted: Mar 10, 2004 - 06:14 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Mar 08, 2004 - 05:13 PM
Posts: 11
Status: Offline
|
Hi, I was wondering that Thrust Vectoring changes the direction of the Thrust Nozzles of fighters, then I was thinking, doesn't the JSF use it?
For instance, I saw a video of a JSF changing it's entire Thrust Nozzel 180 Degrees to do a Verticle Take Off! Does the Harrier use the same system? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 18, 2013 - 7:55 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
habu2
|
Posted: Mar 10, 2004 - 07:47 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 05, 2003 - 09:36 PM
Posts: 2811
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
Does the Harrier use the same system?
Not the same but similar. Harriers have four ejector nozzles, two on each side of the fuselage. These rotate through a range of straight back (90 deg) down to slightly forward (5 deg) to vector the thrust for S/VTOL operation.
The JSF design uses the single aft nozzle and a forward downward facing lift fan, driven off the front of the turbofan engine. |
_________________ Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lawman
|
Posted: Mar 11, 2004 - 06:29 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Nov 20, 2003 - 09:35 PM
Posts: 356
Status: Offline
|
F-35 uses the system developed by lockheed that Habu2 already mentioned. The Boeing F-32 built on the original Harrier system in which 4 nozzles, 2 off the cold half of the engine and 2 off the hot are used in symetrical vectoring.
They also use a puffer system in the wings and tail on the harrier for control in the hover, where as the F-35 uses the main rear nozzle to swivle and give a gentle nudge in the direction the pilot wants to go.
As for in flight thrust vectoring, you could call it that. There is actually a technique called "Viffing" that the Brits used in the Falklands campaign suprised the hell out of several Argentinian pilots. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
habu2
|
Posted: Mar 11, 2004 - 05:16 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 05, 2003 - 09:36 PM
Posts: 2811
Status: Offline
|
| Lawman, does the X-35 design not use 'puffers'? I assumed it did but don't really know... |
_________________ Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jorgo
|
Posted: Mar 12, 2004 - 10:00 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 19, 2004 - 03:59 PM
Posts: 53
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Wildcat
|
Posted: Mar 12, 2004 - 11:42 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Nov 11, 2003 - 12:49 PM
Posts: 289
Status: Offline
|
Habu2, I checked in CodeOne:
There is a roll post at the end of each wing to get lateral control, each producing up to 1,500 pounds of thrust. |
Last edited by Wildcat on Mar 13, 2004 - 01:07 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Bilal_Khan
|
Posted: Mar 12, 2004 - 05:10 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Mar 08, 2004 - 05:13 PM
Posts: 11
Status: Offline
|
| So when the plane is in the air, how does it change it's direction without dropping altitude when it's changing the direction of it's nozzle? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
habu2
|
Posted: Mar 12, 2004 - 05:20 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 05, 2003 - 09:36 PM
Posts: 2811
Status: Offline
|
| Not sure I understand your question, but when you point the nozzle downward you are doing it to replace wing lift with downward thrust (upward thrust vector). |
_________________ Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lawman
|
Posted: Mar 13, 2004 - 04:31 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Nov 20, 2003 - 09:35 PM
Posts: 356
Status: Offline
|
|
Bilal_Khan wrote:
So when the plane is in the air, how does it change it's direction without dropping altitude when it's changing the direction of it's nozzle?
Computer control and compensation. The amount of thrust lost is marginal, the only problem is that it doesnt have quite as much menuvering authority as the puffer system. So in high wind, at sea landing conditions it could take alot more to bring it aboard ship. But all the yaw and pitch control is done threw the engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
allenperos
|
Posted: May 16, 2005 - 12:26 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Feb 24, 2005 - 01:33 PM
Posts: 631
Status: Offline
|
As you add rudder into the wind to land, (SOP) bleed air from the engine is diverted to the puffer ducts on the wing tips, you must add power to keep from descending onto the pad at a high rate. I've done it in the SIM.
I believe the correct forward nozzle position for VSTOL on the Harrier is 10 degrees not 5, for a total of 100 degrees of travel, HABU. It is used as a reverse thrust operation on conventional landings and with nozzles between 0 and 60 degrees. 60 degrees is SOP. |
_________________ F-16B, CC 80-0623 ERAU ROTC
MD-11, 90, 80, Cognizant Aerospace Technical Writer - Powerplant RR, GE, and P&W
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|