Forum: F-16 versus XYZ

MiG-29 vs F-16



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
sneakers
PostPosted: Jun 15, 2012 - 01:30 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jun 05, 2012 - 04:30 AM
Posts: 6

Status: Offline
There is no doubt that todays F-16C with Amraam, AIM-9X and JHMCS would defeat even a modernized Fulcrum in all aspects of air combat.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Jun 20, 2013 - 8:09 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
madrat
PostPosted: Jun 15, 2012 - 04:36 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Mar 03, 2010 - 03:12 AM
Posts: 987

Status: Offline
MiG should have dropped the twin engine -29 for a single engined aircraft, yes. But I think they should have gone the route like the Chinese did with the J-10 and use the Flanker motor. Kill the Fulcrum program altogether. I know the Flogger family gets belittled, but an Al-31 powered MiG-23 offshoot with modern avionics offered slashing attacks similar to what made the Foxbat so difficult to intercept. I'm glad the Soviets never figured out their advantage until the said programs were basically done running the course. The fact they used so many resources on Fulcrum for so little return is quite satisfying. If the MiG-29 had proven to overwhelm the Falcon in most conditions then the balance of power would have shaken out quite differently during arms reduction talks.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic