| Author |
Message |
|
skrip00
|
Posted: Nov 14, 2006 - 12:11 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 535
Location: New Jersey, USA
Status: Offline
|
Its 2012 and you're still in the USAF or USN. Its time to put your horse (F-15, F-16, F-18, AV-8B) out to pasture and move onto a new mount.
So... given a choice, which would you take? The F-35A? Or the F-22A?
Or for Naval aviators: F-35C? Or F/A-18E/F?
Pilots future, current, retired, or no even a pilot... pick your future ride.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Sep 06, 2008 - 11:47 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
skrip00
|
Posted: Nov 14, 2006 - 12:29 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 535
Location: New Jersey, USA
Status: Offline
|
Personally for me, I'd prefer to be a Naval Pilot... especially one in an F-35C. Being on an aircraft carrier means you will always be near the global hot spots. Being the only stealth strike fighter on a carrier means you will enter into harm's way... most likely with the first wave.
In addition to this, you're backed up by EA-18Gs which help reduce the enemy's potential radar effectiveness, and your return home is made easier with Superbugs providing top cover with AMRAAMs and buddy stores to get you home.
Air to air combat may also be possible... but since its a team effort for team USA, the USAF's Raptors will do all the work leaving whats left for the F/A-18Fs to mop up. Even so, being in an F-35C, you still have a good edge with having 2 AAMs internally, an LPI AESA, and an HMS.
Using EOTS, you can accurately self target your 2 LGBs, or even 8 SDBs. Heck, using direction from the Growlers, you can plink some enemy Ground Based Radars with 2 JSOWs from a good distance away. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
swanee
|
Posted: Nov 14, 2006 - 01:08 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Posts: 530
Location: newport news, Va
Status: Offline
|
| Viper and Eagle will be flying past 2012... |
_________________ Life is too short for ugly sailboats, fat women and bad beer!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
skrip00
|
Posted: Nov 14, 2006 - 01:11 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 535
Location: New Jersey, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
FireFox137
|
Posted: Nov 14, 2006 - 01:35 AM
|
|
|
Active member

Joined: Oct 01, 2006
Posts: 130
Status: Offline
|
|
skrip00 wrote:
Personally for me, I'd prefer to be a Naval Pilot... especially one in an F-35C. Being on an aircraft carrier means you will always be near the global hot spots. Being the only stealth strike fighter on a carrier means you will enter into harm's way... most likely with the first wave.
In addition to this, you're backed up by EA-18Gs which help reduce the enemy's potential radar effectiveness, and your return home is made easier with Superbugs providing top cover with AMRAAMs and buddy stores to get you home.
Air to air combat may also be possible... but since its a team effort for team USA, the USAF's Raptors will do all the work leaving whats left for the F/A-18Fs to mop up. Even so, being in an F-35C, you still have a good edge with having 2 AAMs internally, an LPI AESA, and an HMS.
Using EOTS, you can accurately self target your 2 LGBs, or even 8 SDBs. Heck, using direction from the Growlers, you can plink some enemy Ground Based Radars with 2 JSOWs from a good distance away.
I'm sorry if this sounds like a personal attack on you Skrip....
But have you ever been in a war? Have you ever had someone shoot at you? Have you ever seen the aftermath of what happens to the people you drop bombs on? Have you ever had to point a loaded weapon at someone?
Has anyone ever "shot" at you (I have been)? Have you ever seen anyone die because they've lost or limb or blead to death? (I have, first time circa 74, last time circa 91) There's nothing fun about conflict.
You sound like a gung-ho kid who wants to play an Air Combat Sim....... Who gives a rats a$$ about who you kill because they've been drafted in some numbnutts armed forces. I for one would prefer the US to build up the sort of offensive capability that actually using it would never have to happen.
There's nothing glorious about some politician treating you as a pawn and ordering your a$$ into harms way. When was the last time you've walked Vietnam Memorial and seen families crying after some 30+ years of their loss? The door swings both ways kid, for both sides.
Sorry kid, but you're sorta asking for it this time. The truth of the situation is a lot different then you think it's going to be when someone is *actually* trying to *kill* *you*, or after you've actually see someone die.
While I am *STRONGLY* pro-defense, its only such that its never needed. Period.
Yeah, yeah... blah blah blah, "I'm a troll." |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
skrip00
|
Posted: Nov 14, 2006 - 01:47 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 535
Location: New Jersey, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
FireFox137 wrote:
I'm sorry if this sounds like a personal attack on you Skrip....
But have you ever been in a war? Have you ever had someone shoot at you? Have you ever seen the aftermath of what happens to the people you drop bombs on? Have you ever had to point a loaded weapon at someone?
Has anyone ever "shot" at you (I have been)? Have you ever seen anyone die because they've lost or limb or blead to death? (I have, first time circa 74, last time circa 91) There's nothing fun about conflict.
You sound like a gung-ho kid who wants to play an Air Combat Sim....... Who gives a rats a$$ about who you kill because they've been drafted in some numbnutts armed forces. I for one would prefer the US to build up the sort of offensive capability that actually using it would never have to happen.
There's nothing glorious about some politician treating you as a pawn and ordering your a$$ into harms way. When was the last time you've walked Vietnam Memorial and seen families crying after some 30+ years of their loss? The door swings both ways kid, for both sides.
Sorry kid, but you're sorta asking for it this time. The truth of the situation is a lot different then you think it's going to be when someone is *actually* trying to *kill* *you*, or after you've actually see someone die.
While I am *STRONGLY* pro-defense, its only such that its never needed. Period.
Yeah, yeah... blah blah blah, "I'm a troll."
Whatever...  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
skrip00
|
Posted: Nov 14, 2006 - 09:25 PM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 535
Location: New Jersey, USA
Status: Offline
|
| Wonderful, leave it to FireFox to ruin the thread. Good job... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
tjodalv43
|
Posted: Nov 14, 2006 - 09:30 PM
|
|
|
Frequent Poster

Joined: Sep 21, 2005
Posts: 74
Status: Offline
|
True. Its just a forum. Theres nothing wrong with being a gung-ho kid and I didn't see anyone asking for a flame. Wow.
But in any case, I chose the F-35A because of how multi-role it is/will be. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Neno
|
Posted: Nov 15, 2006 - 10:53 AM
|
|
|
Active member

Joined: Sep 29, 2006
Posts: 111
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
skrip00
|
Posted: Nov 15, 2006 - 11:25 PM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 535
Location: New Jersey, USA
Status: Offline
|
| SuperHornet Gets No Lovin'. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Delta
|
Posted: Nov 16, 2006 - 12:52 AM
|
|
|
Active member

Joined: May 27, 2004
Posts: 124
Status: Offline
|
|
skrip00 wrote:
SuperHornet Gets No Lovin'.
And why should it with the Raptor around?  |
_________________ USAFA Class of 2009 "HUB!"
|
|
|
|
 |
|
asiatrails
|
Posted: Nov 17, 2006 - 03:35 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Posts: 663
Status: Offline
|
| F35B, it's better to stop and land, than land and hope to stop. Especially on board !!! My choice is none of the above as the F35B is not listed. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
skrip00
|
Posted: Nov 17, 2006 - 03:47 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 535
Location: New Jersey, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
asiatrails wrote:
F35B, it's better to stop and land, than land and hope to stop. Especially on board !!! My choice is none of the above as the F35B is not listed.
Crap... I totally forgot about the jumpjet jocks.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
asiatrails
|
Posted: Nov 17, 2006 - 04:48 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Posts: 663
Status: Offline
|
|
skrip00 wrote:
asiatrails wrote:
F35B, it's better to stop and land, than land and hope to stop. Especially on board !!! My choice is none of the above as the F35B is not listed.
Crap... I totally forgot about the jumpjet jocks.
Chomp !! |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
29.08 KB |
| Viewed: |
3865 Time(s) |

|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Scorpion1alpha
|
Posted: Nov 17, 2006 - 02:23 PM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Oct 21, 2005
Posts: 757
Status: Offline
|
My choices:
A2A and time sensitive A2G missions: F-22 Raptor (surprise).
Everyday A2G with great A2A capabilities: F-35A Lightning 2 (CTOL). |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|