| Author |
Message |
|
Safetystick
|
 Posted: Oct 08, 2007 - 02:02 PM
|
 
|
|
Active member
Joined: May 13, 2005
Posts: 156
Location: Sussex, UK
Status: Offline
|
| As vesatile as a Nuke can be I guess... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: Sep 08, 2008 - 3:50 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
boff180
|
|
Posted: Oct 08, 2007 - 02:09 PM
|
|
|
Elite
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Posts: 781
Status: Offline
|
Well it had a fully variable yielf, which could be set on the ground or in the aircraft in flight; it had multiple delivery methods including helicopter for the lowest yield and had different engagement angles including laydown, parachute, underwater,.etc.etc
Truly vesatile  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
seat_dreamer
|
|
Posted: Oct 08, 2007 - 07:38 PM
|
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 278
Location: Athens, Greece
Status: Offline
|
| Here's a challenge from me too ! |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
71.53 KB |
| Viewed: |
1384 Time(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMIguy
|
|
Posted: Oct 08, 2007 - 07:46 PM
|
|
|
Elite
Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Posts: 666
Status: Offline
|
| KMU 342/B(M117) BOLT 117LGB ? |
Last edited by ACMIguy on Oct 08, 2007 - 07:49 PM; edited 1 time in total
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMIguy
|
|
Posted: Oct 08, 2007 - 07:48 PM
|
|
|
Elite
Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Posts: 666
Status: Offline
|
| how about this one? |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
22.5 KB |
| Viewed: |
1406 Time(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Safetystick
|
|
Posted: Oct 08, 2007 - 08:50 PM
|
|
|
Active member
Joined: May 13, 2005
Posts: 156
Location: Sussex, UK
Status: Offline
|
1st is Paveway I GBU-1/B with M117 warhead. It was one of the inspirations for the Enhanced Paveway's conduit system. Weird how these things go around.
2nd is GBU-11/B with 9I had to look this up) M118 warhead.
I only know the 2nd one because I was going to do exactly what Seat Dreamer did for the 1st  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Safetystick
|
|
Posted: Oct 08, 2007 - 08:54 PM
|
|
|
Active member
Joined: May 13, 2005
Posts: 156
Location: Sussex, UK
Status: Offline
|
| Keeping with the Paveway family. Obvious at first but I'm looking for particulars. |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
25.69 KB |
| Viewed: |
1383 Time(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henrik
|
|
Posted: Oct 09, 2007 - 11:09 AM
|
|
|
Elite
Joined: Jul 12, 2005
Posts: 1543
Status: Offline
|
Could it be a GBU-24 B/B E/B Series Low Level Laser Guided Bomb, Hard Target Penetrator (LLLGB, HTP)?? The GBU-24 Series LLLGB, HTP is a weapon which has a laser guidance package attached to a penetrator warhead - like the one in the photo above??!!
Greetings,
Henrik. |
_________________
Vipers Vorever!!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49266321@N00/
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMIguy
|
|
Posted: Oct 09, 2007 - 02:10 PM
|
|
|
Elite
Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Posts: 666
Status: Offline
|
I almost agree with Henrik except the bomb body looks longer then the MK 84 so I would say it would be a BLU-109/B Penetrator bomb. One thing I see on this one I've never seen on our versions on the ramp is the cable or conduit running from the seeker to the hardback. The lugs are different too, so I suspect this is not an USAF bomb. The lugs look like they maybe the spring loaded type used on other munitions like the JASSM.
As for the GBU 1
A Paveway I add-on kit consisted of a gimballed seeker head, a Computer Control Group (CCG), and a set of airfoils. The latter were made up of fixed cruciform tailfins (also referred to as wings) and four movable canards (except for the KMU-342/B, which had the moving surfaces on the tail).
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusr ... way-1.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Safetystick
|
|
Posted: Oct 10, 2007 - 07:53 PM
|
|
|
Active member
Joined: May 13, 2005
Posts: 156
Location: Sussex, UK
Status: Offline
|
| Okay, the answer is that it's an Enhanced Paveway III (UK). The clue that it's an Enhanced Paveway is the conduit (as Henrick says, teh US would term it GBU-24 E/B). The clue that it's a (UK) is the revised hardback with extra 14" lug positions (US ones only have 30") and the UK (and a few export users) only MACE lugs. It does indeed have a BLU-109 warhead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMIguy
|
|
Posted: Oct 10, 2007 - 10:04 PM
|
|
|
Elite
Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Posts: 666
Status: Offline
|
| What is the conduit for? Seems it would inhibit fin movement in some degree. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Safetystick
|
|
Posted: Oct 12, 2007 - 08:33 AM
|
|
|
Active member
Joined: May 13, 2005
Posts: 156
Location: Sussex, UK
Status: Offline
|
No limitation on fin movement that I'm aware of. It protects an electrical lead connecting the aircraft interface (EP2 are dual guidance and need to talk to the aircraft) to the guidance unit.
It's the easiest way to identify an EP variant. Presence of a conduit on the nose (and often a hardware store's worth of jubilee clips ) and a 1760 connector on the tail. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMIguy
|
|
Posted: Oct 12, 2007 - 01:29 PM
|
|
|
Elite
Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Posts: 666
Status: Offline
|
| Interesting, the ones I've loaded in the US do not connect to anything requiring A/C interface. I take it that duel guidance would be laser and GPS? Don't know why you would use 1760 for anything else. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Safetystick
|
|
Posted: Oct 12, 2007 - 07:52 PM
|
|
|
Active member
Joined: May 13, 2005
Posts: 156
Location: Sussex, UK
Status: Offline
|
Yep, Laser and GPS/INS.
More information here Here. It's not a bad summary of the basics of the weapon. Plus its where I nicked the picture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Forum Guidelines
