F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: Hardest part about working on the F-16 - F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-6616-start-45-sid-329e35b387ab1109c072c8fe26ebdef4.html
Printed on: 07 October 2008

Forum: F-16 Design & Construction

Hardest part about working on the F-16



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
dmac
PostPosted: Mar 16, 2007 - 08:22 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: 48

Dealing with all the BS that some new 23 year old zero thinks will get he/she promoted. Most of us were doing this when they were 8 years old!! Or someone/pro sup who thinks the water seperator sock fixes all ECS problems. Or night flying Thursday, and having 0600 crew shows Friday so the pilots have a nice long weekend, obtw reconfig all the jets for the heck of it for Monday.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Oct 07, 2008 - 3:44 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor






This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
   
 
dukey172
PostPosted: Feb 20, 2008 - 09:54 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jan 30, 2008
Posts: 8

Status: Offline
It's not a hard part to change but the b system pump is a pain. remove the jfs, take the lines off the pump. The damn case drain line.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
JoeSambor
PostPosted: Feb 20, 2008 - 03:49 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Dec 28, 2004
Posts: 384

Status: Offline
Safety wiring the cockpit dump valve after an ECS pressure check was always a bear...one night we had a new kid on the job, and when it was wrapped up we told him to do the safety wire. We went back to the truck to get warm and he popped his head in about five minutes later, carrying the toolbox. Incredulous, our E+E 7-level inspected it, and it was good to go. I guess we forgot to tell him it was impossible to do.

Avionics wise, soldering the filters on the interphone amp was always big fun. We did a lot of that at MacDill, when moisture accumulated in the cockpit, especially station wagons. The pilots would have good comm until they made that hard right turn on the way back to the chocks...the water would slosh over the interphone amp and short the whole works out.

Changing the throttle quadrant was something I only did once, and swore never to do again. But there we were at Spang, ready to deploy in three days and there is a bad harness from the throttle grip to the bulkhead. I ordered just the harness, and miracle of miracles, it issued! We pulled the old harness out through the quadrant, taped up all the wires on the new one and attached some safety wire, and pulled it back through. Took the tape off, pinned the wires, put it all back together. At one point, QA asked us where our Tech Order was. We showed them the 00GV-00-2 and they went away.

Best Regards,

_________________
Joe Sambor
LM Aero Field Service Engineer
Woensdrecht Logistics Center, The Netherlands
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ACMIguy
PostPosted: Feb 20, 2008 - 04:20 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Posts: 667

Status: Offline
Pulling a gun after a jam with live rounds chambered was one that took some creative thinking. We had a EOD guy tell us we needed to cut the bulkhead panel to remove the gun with the barrels still installed. My buddy and I attached a pipe wrench and wanged the barrel till it came loose and free.
The next was wing box replacement. The first time took two days just to remove the wires. After that I started removing a few wafer plugs and was able to slide them in in out in less than 2 hours. We got it down to complete removal in one day and an install the next.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
specs343579
PostPosted: Feb 20, 2008 - 08:20 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 23

Status: Offline
We canned a Nose Radome once. The funny part was the prosuper expected it to fly by the next day. I guess they forgot to tell him about the AOA boresight that it creates. another ops check that is a pain is an @n "alpha- N" ops check for air data. but that is usually the test equipement not the aircraft
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SixerViper
PostPosted: Feb 20, 2008 - 10:21 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Jun 05, 2007
Posts: 347

Status: Offline
The alpha-N check took about an hour's worth of work to set up and about two minutes to do it. I was never so disappointed in my life as when I did my first one and got to the end of it. "That's all there is to it???" That's a whole lotta work for such a short check!! The FLCS Programmed Gains check was a lot of work but fun--especially when you had to raise the gear handle with hydraulic pressure on the jet and the pins in the gear!

I remember once I installed a wiring harness in the nose of a jet. That harness was about 25 ft long, had about 30 connectors, and ran from panel 1206 (just aft of the ckt bkr panel 1205 right above the intake) all the way up to the radar antenna. The bad thing about this job was that I had not removed the old harness; the guy who did just ripped it out leaving adel clamps hanging on the remaining harnesses, and then went on vacation. Three weeks, one deep laceration in a finger, God knows how many cuss words, and FOD checks by no fewer than seven different people including QA, and the jet flew code 1. The next day, we opened up 1205 for an unrelated problem, dropped the circuit breaker panel, and damned if a stray adel clamp didn't fall out! That was embarrassing.

All this just because some rocket scientist out at Hill Depot left a common screwdriver sitting point down on the wiring harness at the forward inboard corner of the INU and our acceptance people didn't catch it. Of course, neither did Hill's...wonder how that rocket scientist managed to inventory his CTK that day. One of our 3-levels found it. I was proud of him! Unfortunately ,by the time he found the screwdriver several wires had chafed down to the conductors.

On the night of 30 Sep-1 Oct 2001 I worked swing/graveyard shift and had to re-code the entire fleet for SADL, EGI, Secure Voice, Have Quick, and M4 all in the same night. I may be wrong about the EGI; we may not have had it at the time. The SADL was the worst because we had not done the TCTO for the remote fill and had to open up the panels to re code it. I climbed out of one jet and the sun had come up! This was during ONE and before our weekenders, er--oops, traditional guardsmen, had been called up.

_________________
F-106A/B '69-'73
F-105D/F '73-'81
A-7D/K '81-'91
F-16C/D '91-'05
SCUBA bum '05-Present
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ACMIguy
PostPosted: Feb 20, 2008 - 11:52 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jul 11, 2007
Posts: 667

Status: Offline
Oh I forgot one, trying to find where the Edwards guys cut the gun trigger wire for some of their test bed equipment.
No paperwork no orange wires, nothing but the jet, me and the FI.
Thanks ED Bang Head Evil or Very Mad
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Shortcut
PostPosted: Feb 21, 2008 - 01:48 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jan 04, 2008
Posts: 16

Status: Offline
The hardest part of working on the F-16 is... working for a Maint Officer in Aviano that cares about nothing els besides becoming a Lt Col. (You know who you are) "We don't work 12hr shifts on non-flyers,,, unless the squadron FMC rate is below USAFE goals of course." That would not look good on an OPR.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
WilliamG
PostPosted: Feb 21, 2008 - 03:34 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Dec 10, 2003
Posts: 98

Status: Offline
Working the FLCS Batteries under 1305...
Rate Gyros are a pain but not too bad.
MLG WOW is a Beeotch...
Having arguments with Fuels as to who changes the probes.
Radome swaps suck big time Had one which they wanted to Cann the radome and install it on another bird to prevent it from being hangar queen...Nothing I hate more than doubling my work load...
Always loved the fact that some people never thought that the 10JG step. PROBE HEAT OFF!!! Applied to them. Side Mount AD Probe and the Pitot. Replacements are such fun. Quick grab me that TTU 205 ( the old analog one not the Digital one) and lets do the full ops check...


William G

_________________
B-Shop 85 -92
Misawa 13th
Mac Dill 72nd 61st
Kunsan 35th
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
maddog2840
PostPosted: Feb 21, 2008 - 03:52 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Mar 26, 2004
Posts: 656

Status: Offline
All the things mentioned are really up there on the scale. But if there can only be one thing.

Replacing a throttle cable. Doh

Made slightly easier if you happen to have someone who has done it before. Bang Head

_________________
Vipers Fight while Raptors Train.
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
viperbuilder
PostPosted: Feb 29, 2008 - 06:05 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Feb 28, 2008
Posts: 13

Try removing a PDU or gun drum from a family model with the rooftop luggage rack (dorsal avionics equipment bays) These were not on a USAF jet but in addition to the regular pains of a PDU removal, you must remove the avionics, ecs ducts and tubes, harnesses, and one small dorsal bulkhead before you can even see the PDU bay cover. The PDU bay is so packed that it takes two people to remove the PDU dipstick. Just another case of engineering trying to stuff 10lbs of *&%^ into a 5 lb bag. Gotta love it!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
specs343579
PostPosted: Feb 29, 2008 - 08:49 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Posts: 23

Status: Offline
SixerViper wrote:
The alpha-N check took about an hour's worth of work to set up and about two minutes to do it. I was never so disappointed in my life as when I did my first one and got to the end of it. "That's all there is to it???" That's a whole lotta work for such a short check!! The FLCS Programmed Gains check was a lot of work but fun--especially when you had to raise the gear handle with hydraulic pressure on the jet and the pins in the gear!

I remember once I installed a wiring harness in the nose of a jet. That harness was about 25 ft long, had about 30 connectors, and ran from panel 1206 (just aft of the ckt bkr panel 1205 right above the intake) all the way up to the radar antenna. The bad thing about this job was that I had not removed the old harness; the guy who did just ripped it out leaving adel clamps hanging on the remaining harnesses, and then went on vacation. Three weeks, one deep laceration in a finger, God knows how many cuss words, and FOD checks by no fewer than seven different people including QA, and the jet flew code 1. The next day, we opened up 1205 for an unrelated problem, dropped the circuit breaker panel, and damned if a stray adel clamp didn't fall out! That was embarrassing.

All this just because some rocket scientist out at Hill Depot left a common screwdriver sitting point down on the wiring harness at the forward inboard corner of the INU and our acceptance people didn't catch it. Of course, neither did Hill's...wonder how that rocket scientist managed to inventory his CTK that day. One of our 3-levels found it. I was proud of him! Unfortunately ,by the time he found the screwdriver several wires had chafed down to the conductors.

On the night of 30 Sep-1 Oct 2001 I worked swing/graveyard shift and had to re-code the entire fleet for SADL, EGI, Secure Voice, Have Quick, and M4 all in the same night. I may be wrong about the EGI; we may not have had it at the time. The SADL was the worst because we had not done the TCTO for the remote fill and had to open up the panels to re code it. I climbed out of one jet and the sun had come up! This was during ONE and before our weekenders, er--oops, traditional guardsmen, had been called up.



Yeah I did a programmed gains check and we told the guy in the cockpit to put the handle up but he left the FLCS in DBU. When he put the handle up with pins installed I have never seen an airplane vibrate so much before in my life. I swear to god it almost shook itself off the jacks. Every time since then I have always been leary of that step in the procedure.

As for depot those people aren't the best. I don't think they inventory their boxes because they are all contractors with their own personal tools. dont quote me on that though. however A guy I worked with at Hill found a breaker bar inside an ISA panel one time it had etching on it so he had the luxury of walking over to depot to find the guy who it belonged too. and still the depot guy really didnt care much. that he left it in the jet. He was more excited that we found his tool he had been looking for.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
mark
PostPosted: Feb 29, 2008 - 10:15 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Dec 09, 2003
Posts: 378

Status: Offline
No, for the most part the mechanics at the depot at Hill are not contractors. That's not to say that there arent some, but for the most part they are civil service employees. BTW they do NOT have their own tools. They get their tits in a wringer when they lose them. They are supposed to inventory their boxes when they change jets, start new jobs and at the end of the day which ever happens first. Lets not throw rocks about tools left in jets......I have horror stories I can tell about the stuff I have found in jets when they get to the depot.
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
JoeSambor
PostPosted: Feb 29, 2008 - 10:21 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Dec 28, 2004
Posts: 384

Status: Offline
You should be "leary" of that step...the Programmed Gain Checkout does not require the aircraft to be up on jacks. In fact, running flight controls while on jacks is extremely dangerous.

I'm guessing you had a little memory error.

Best Regards,

_________________
Joe Sambor
LM Aero Field Service Engineer
Woensdrecht Logistics Center, The Netherlands
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
WilliamG
PostPosted: Mar 01, 2008 - 03:38 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Dec 10, 2003
Posts: 98

Status: Offline
Joe,
Who was the CC who in the 14th did a gear swing almost all the time when he could...
Just for Snits and Giggles...

William G

_________________
B-Shop 85 -92
Misawa 13th
Mac Dill 72nd 61st
Kunsan 35th
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel