Forum: Job Openings

U.S. Air Force wants 40,000 people out



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
vinnie
PostPosted: Sep 27, 2006 - 11:21 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Feb 06, 2004
Posts: 374
Location: Valdosta ,Ga
Status: Offline
Just read over on the AF news site that the AF wants 40,000 people out over the next 3 years. Hope it doesn't get approved but it most likely will, they want the money for aircraft and equipment. It makes me want to puke.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Jul 24, 2008 - 10:55 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor






This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
   
 
Amigaman
PostPosted: Sep 27, 2006 - 11:44 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Regular User
Regular User


Joined: Aug 30, 2006
Posts: 23

Status: Offline
This happened back in 1991 when people in the Air Force were given the early 15 year retirement option. We lost a lot of good Crew Chiefs that were feed-up with what was going on in the Air Force. The a few years latter Crew Chiefs were given large reinlistment bonuses to stay in. And lets not forget ever popular mega signing bonus. In 10 years this cycle will start all over again with more SRBs and more money to keep people to stay in with a less attractive retirement plan for thoughs people who will become carrer Airman.
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
vinnie
PostPosted: Sep 28, 2006 - 03:31 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Feb 06, 2004
Posts: 374
Location: Valdosta ,Ga
Status: Offline
You forgot about the SSI/SSB crap . Talk about getting bent over. My shop foreman was a FTD AGE instructor with 11 years in and they gave him 3 months to out. Thanks for all the hard work and dedication but please leave and do it quickly.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Belshanar
PostPosted: Sep 28, 2006 - 05:37 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active member
Active member


Joined: Nov 29, 2004
Posts: 146

Status: Offline
Its going to hapen. I was one of the first to be told to get out in this new round of cuts. Thank goodness I was able to find a back door to stay in the Air Force. Granted I'm now a traditional reservist, but my career will continue, and thats what is important to me. Plus, once the training for my new job is done I'll finally get to deploy, which is something I have wanted to do ever since I swore in over thre years ago.

_________________
Air Force Munitions Officer 2003 - 2006
Air Battle Manager 2006 - Present
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
RIDIM
PostPosted: Sep 28, 2006 - 05:44 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Regular User
Regular User


Joined: Sep 29, 2005
Posts: 24

Status: Offline
vinnie wrote:
Just read over on the AF news site that the AF wants 40,000 people out over the next 3 years. Hope it doesn't get approved but it most likely will, they want the money for acft and equipment. It makes me want to puke.


Wow, thats the size of our entire Air force here in the UK Sad Even for a force the size of the USAF that is a lot of manpower to lose.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
checksixx
PostPosted: Sep 28, 2006 - 06:16 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1021

Status: Offline
Yup...a program called 'Quality Air Force' started this downfall years ago.

-Check
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Meathook
PostPosted: Oct 02, 2006 - 11:39 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 2945
Location: Utah
All true, back in 92 my wife and I has been stationed in the UK, She has only been back from Iraq six months ,had a line number for Tech when she was told, she and several thousand other (462's) weapons loaders had to get out, she had no choice.

She was just about seven years from retirement when she had to leave, talk about pissed off and a big hardly thank you for service, it sucked big time, then and now. We are losing folks everywhere and the operational tempo has not changed, if anything, it is worse.

Out of 25 folks in our organization (XP) now at the depot, we are losing ten of them, two from earlier retirement. This more with less crap has got to stop, all suffer from it, the servicing organizations, the customers and the employees, not forgetting the USAF as a whole.

Politicians need to pull their collective heads out of their a$$ ad stop the rape of the military and her forces if we are to be a force to be reckoned with at all.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
huggy
PostPosted: Dec 11, 2006 - 10:19 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active member
Active member


Joined: Jan 27, 2004
Posts: 209
Location: Sacramento, CA
Status: Offline
It's no longer called a "RIF": they've cleaned it the terminology and now call it "Force Shaping". Isn't that nicer?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
akruse21
PostPosted: Dec 11, 2006 - 11:30 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Jul 30, 2005
Posts: 734
Location: RAF Lakenheath, UK
Status: Offline
We arent kicking any enlisted folks out that dont deserve the boot. A lot of "over manned" career field folks are being forced to cross train though. As long as you have a decent record you will still be allowed to reenlist. The next 10 years are going to be very interesting I think.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Arctus
PostPosted: Dec 11, 2006 - 01:01 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active member
Active member


Joined: May 13, 2006
Posts: 164
Location: Alaska
Status: Offline
When drawdowns are massive you get primarily the better performers separating during the voluntary phase.
The losers tend to stay in until forced out.

Personally, I think invol separations should be treated like WAPS testing but in reverse. After getting rid of all the control roster types, target the slugs by combining EPR points, SKT/PFE scores, dec's, and the new fitness score and eliminate the lowest overall scores first regardless of AFSC or TIS/TIG.

You scored a 48 on your PFE and a 51 on your SKT? Congrats your getting out...instead of Congrats! You made Staff!

_________________
354 FW Eielson 02-05
389 FS Mtn Home 99-02
54 & 90 FS Elmendorf 91-99
479 TTW Holloman 84-91
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sulfer732
PostPosted: Dec 11, 2006 - 01:13 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active member
Active member


Joined: Dec 11, 2005
Posts: 131
Location: Luke AFB, AZ
Status: Offline
the "force shaping" is getting rid of all the dead weight... people holding a high time in grade, bad records, turning down orders, refusing to WAPS test, and things of that nature. after they get rid of these folks, it will get interesting to see where they take people from.
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
WingedRyno
PostPosted: Dec 20, 2006 - 01:23 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Dec 20, 2006
Posts: 4

Status: Offline
There are those in Congress that know the AF needs more, and definitely not less, people. They may just throw some extra money to the AF and end this silly force shaping.

Or maybe McCain can end the F22 / F35 lust and make the Air Force spend its money on aircraft we can actually use in the two wars we're currently engaged in.

At any rate, if you need a job in the Air Force, in the next several years you'll see major hiring.

_________________
Click to View My Pilot Slot Stats
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
akruse21
PostPosted: Dec 20, 2006 - 01:57 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Jul 30, 2005
Posts: 734
Location: RAF Lakenheath, UK
Status: Offline
I'm going to have to disagree with you on your theory. The people are gone and wont be coming back anytime soon. The 22 is here to stay along with the 35.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
HazF16
PostPosted: Dec 20, 2006 - 02:42 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Sep 24, 2005
Posts: 345
Location: anytime, anywhere
Status: Offline
now i can see where they're coming from but i think it still kinda contradicts the fact that i just heard that the President wants to increase the total size of the military..
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Purplehaze
PostPosted: Dec 20, 2006 - 04:53 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 1149
Location: Greencastle, PA
Status: Offline
Quote:

now i can see where they're coming from but i think it still kinda contradicts the fact that i just heard that the President wants to increase the total size of the military..


I believe he only want to increase the Army and Marines.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel