Forum: F-35 Lightning II

F-35 and civilian air traffic - how will this be solved?



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2, 3, 4  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Boman
PostPosted: Sep 18, 2006 - 05:54 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Jul 08, 2004
Posts: 584
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Just curious;
The Viper usually carries a dummy sidewinder with a special head to make it more visible for the radars of civilian jets and air traffic controllers/radars. This is because the Viper has naturally very low radar signature from the design.

How can the F-35 do the same given the excellent stealth capabilities?
Will they fly it with one of the internal bay doors open and the missile rack extended with special winder on it, or can/will they mount missile rails on the wingtips and mount it there? (read somewhere that this could be done!)

Interesting question don`t you think Wink
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Jul 09, 2008 - 1:58 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor






This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
   
 
seat_dreamer
PostPosted: Sep 18, 2006 - 05:56 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Apr 08, 2006
Posts: 278
Location: Athens, Greece
Status: Offline
Transponder ?

_________________
"144-0 kill ratio.....Ok 144-1 but that's 1 compared to your entire airforce."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Patriot
PostPosted: Sep 18, 2006 - 05:59 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active member
Active member


Joined: Sep 02, 2006
Posts: 183
Location: Kielce - Poland
Status: Offline
Yeah, transponder is a good solution Idea

_________________
Great Balls Of Fire
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
Pumpkin
PostPosted: Sep 18, 2006 - 06:06 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Nov 07, 2003
Posts: 902

Lockheed Martin's very own Silent Sentry perhaps..

_________________
Desmond


Last edited by Pumpkin on Sep 18, 2006 - 06:18 PM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
akruse21
PostPosted: Sep 18, 2006 - 06:08 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Jul 30, 2005
Posts: 725
Location: RAF Lakenheath, UK
Status: Offline
same thing they have done with the 117
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
falconfixer860261
PostPosted: Sep 18, 2006 - 06:33 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: May 17, 2005
Posts: 984

Status: Offline
The pilot has to wrap his helmet in aluminum foil..... Very Happy
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
idesof
PostPosted: Sep 18, 2006 - 06:35 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: May 29, 2006
Posts: 640

Status: Offline
Boman wrote:
Just curious;
The Viper usually carries a dummy sidewinder with a special head to make it more visible for the radars of civilian jets and air traffic controllers/radars. This is because the Viper has naturally very low radar signature from the design.

How can the F-35 do the same given the excellent stealth capabilities?
Will they fly it with one of the internal bay doors open and the missile rack extended with special winder on it, or can/will they mount missile rails on the wingtips and mount it there? (read somewhere that this could be done!)

Interesting question don`t you think Wink


Stealth fighter pilots are instructed to fly with the canopy open in civilian airspace holding up a large, basketball-sized metal sphere to increase the airplane's RCS. Also, the Raptor is equiped with a pylon on its spine to enable it to carry an F-15 piggy-back style so as to increase its RCS, kind of like the Shuttle on top of a 747.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sferrin
PostPosted: Sep 18, 2006 - 06:42 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 895

Status: Offline
akruse21 wrote:
same thing they have done with the 117


And B-2

And F-22
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Raptor_DCTR
PostPosted: Sep 18, 2006 - 10:08 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: May 23, 2005
Posts: 444

Status: Offline
Quote:
idesof wrote: Stealth fighter pilots are instructed to fly with the canopy open in civilian airspace holding up a large, basketball-sized metal sphere to increase the airplane's RCS. Also, the Raptor is equiped with a pylon on its spine to enable it to carry an F-15 piggy-back style so as to increase its RCS, kind of like the Shuttle on top of a 747
....LMAO LMAO
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
asiatrails
PostPosted: Sep 19, 2006 - 04:20 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Posts: 595
Location: San Antonio
Status: Offline
idesof wrote: Stealth fighter pilots are instructed to fly with the canopy open in civilian airspace holding up a large, basketball-sized metal sphere to increase the airplane's RCS. Also, the Raptor is equiped with a pylon on its spine to enable it to carry an F-15 piggy-back style so as to increase its RCS, kind of like the Shuttle on top of a 747.


Nanoo Nanoo to you too.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
dwightlooi
PostPosted: Sep 19, 2006 - 05:03 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Aug 02, 2006
Posts: 885

Status: Offline
I don't think this is an issue at all. The F-35 and F-22 will simply do what commerical airliners do -- actively broadcasr their own location (acquired via GPS or inertial means), altitude, vector and identity to whoever is interested. The audience includes civilian air traffic controls and other aircrafts in the air.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Roscoe
PostPosted: Sep 19, 2006 - 05:18 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Jun 29, 2004
Posts: 953
Location: Las Vegas
Status: Offline
Boman wrote:
Just curious;
The Viper usually carries a dummy sidewinder with a special head to make it more visible for the radars of civilian jets and air traffic controllers/radars. This is because the Viper has naturally very low radar signature from the design.

How can the F-35 do the same given the excellent stealth capabilities?
Will they fly it with one of the internal bay doors open and the missile rack extended with special winder on it, or can/will they mount missile rails on the wingtips and mount it there? (read somewhere that this could be done!)

Interesting question don`t you think Wink


You're kidding right? Because this is absolutely not true. Vipers fly "naked" fairly frequently. In fact, most wingtip missiles in peace/training are just dead weight to prevent flutter.

While ATC radars are capable of "skin painting" and aircraft, they get no aircraft info that way. That is why aircraft carry transponders...not only do they they transmit a signal that is stronger than a skin return, but that signal includes ID and altitude. Even Stealthy jets have them for normal flying (because their skin return is in fact pretty small)

_________________
Roscoe

<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
akruse21
PostPosted: Sep 19, 2006 - 06:21 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Jul 30, 2005
Posts: 725
Location: RAF Lakenheath, UK
Status: Offline
when we got a tour of the 117's at holl, the green suit showed us three small metal boxes that are attached to the top bottom and sides of the aircraft when flying in the states to return a better "skin" paint. The transponder does the real job though. Those boxes were there just in case.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
idesof
PostPosted: Sep 19, 2006 - 03:58 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: May 29, 2006
Posts: 640

Status: Offline
Roscoe wrote:
You're kidding right? Because this is absolutely not true. Vipers fly "naked" fairly frequently. In fact, most wingtip missiles in peace/training are just dead weight to prevent flutter.

While ATC radars are capable of "skin painting" and aircraft, they get no aircraft info that way. That is why aircraft carry transponders...not only do they they transmit a signal that is stronger than a skin return, but that signal includes ID and altitude. Even Stealthy jets have them for normal flying (because their skin return is in fact pretty small)


Okay, all kidding aside. You have to remember that pinpointing aircraft location through a transponder is not the only issue. Stealth aircraft always have and always will mount signature-enhancing thingamajigs in civilian airspace not so much so that they may be found but so that no aircraft without a need to know could possibly get any kind of radar info on its true, unenhanced signature. Think of the Raptor, which has been doing the airshow circuit quite a lot lately. If all it carried was a transponder but no signature-enhacing dohickey, any "interested party" could set up their very own radar station adjacent to the airfield in question and get a pretty good picture of its radar return. That, of course, would be a no-no. Thus, whenever you see an F-117 or F-22, they always have either these pyramidal or cylindrical objects protruding from the top and bottom of the aircraft to enhance their signature. You know those agressor F-16s and F-16Ns with the pave-penny-like pods on station 5L (or 5R, can't remember)? Same purpose. Enhances the aircraft's naturally small radar signature to simulate that of a Mig-29 or Su-27.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
falconfixer860261
PostPosted: Sep 19, 2006 - 05:04 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: May 17, 2005
Posts: 984

Status: Offline
I was in the F-22 program and have no clue of what you are talking about regarding cylindrical or pyramidal protrusions.....Same goes for what you are saying about the Agressor -16's...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel