Forum: F-35 Armament, Stores and Tactics

ESSM as an internal anti-radiation missile for F-35 and F-22



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
dwightlooi
PostPosted: Aug 23, 2006 - 11:54 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Aug 02, 2006 - 01:14 AM
Posts: 1170

Status: Offline
What do you guys think of the idea of using the RIM-162 Evolved Sea Sparrow Missile as the basis for a new Anti-Radiation Missile for the F-22 and F-35? It seems perfect for this purpose.

(1) The ESSM is a 10" missile with folding aft fins such that it fits neatly in a 10"x10" envelope. What this means is that it can be a 1 for 1 replacement for an AMRAAM in the F-22 and possibly two will fit on the 2000 lb station in the F-35.

(2) The ESSM is 3.66 m long which is identical to the AIM-120 length wise.

(3) The ESSM is 10" which makes it a perfect candidate to graft the 10" guidance and warhead section of the AGM-88 HARM or AARGM missiles onto.

(4) The ESSM is a 50km SAM when launched from a ship. This makes it in essence at least a 200km air launched weapon when delivered from high altitude and with a supersonic release -- the SLAMRAAM is a mere 16km SAM but is at least a 60~70km AAM even in its earlier iterations. A 200km reach is more than enough for an anti-radiation missile.

(5) The ESSM is a Mach 4+ weapon even as a SAM and should be at least a Mach 4.5+ missile in an air launched hi-lo engagement. This is extraodrinary performance for an anti-radiation missile.

In fact, if you come to think of it, fitting an AMRAAM forebody to the ESSM booster makes for a turnkey interim long range 200km AAM solution -- no need for RAMJET or VFDRs. And, it'll fit in the F-22 and the F-35 as is.

 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 26, 2013 - 1:19 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
rapier01
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2006 - 02:07 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Nov 10, 2005 - 02:43 AM
Posts: 92

Status: Offline
Why bother with a anti-radiation missile when you have sensors precise enough to locate a SAM/radar site onboard both types of aircraft? The sensors on the Raptor and JSF are quite exceptional. A supersonical released JDAM or SDB would be more then adequate to permanently take down the site from significant ranges especially considered the Raptor can release SDBs and JDAMs from Mach 1.9 and 60 000ft.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sferrin
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2006 - 04:21 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 22, 2005 - 04:23 AM
Posts: 1613

Status: Offline
I said essentially the same thing in a post several months ago. all I heard was a bunch of crickets chirping in reply. For using ESSM as an AAM that is. As for using it as an antiradiation missile see HSAD. That's the ramjet version of HARM that is apparently still being worked on.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
mabie
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2006 - 08:23 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 07, 2006 - 02:35 PM
Posts: 24

Status: Offline
probably simpler and cheaper to reprogram an AMRAAM to do the job..it already has a "homeon jam"mode so it should be easily modifiable to follow radar transmissions back to their source..
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sferrin
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2006 - 09:11 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 22, 2005 - 04:23 AM
Posts: 1613

Status: Offline
mabie wrote:
probably simpler and cheaper to reprogram an AMRAAM to do the job..it already has a "homeon jam"mode so it should be easily modifiable to follow radar transmissions back to their source..


You're missing the point. the idea is to provide the Raptor with a weapon more powerful than AMRAAM that is pretty much already in existence. I say "pretty much" because they'd still have to swap out seekers.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
F-4Phantomflier
PostPosted: Aug 25, 2006 - 07:10 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 24, 2006 - 09:30 PM
Posts: 33
Location: Use Radar you'll find me
Status: Offline
Well, the U.S. is working on high concentration energy weapons which are small enough to fit on an F-35 and it would have a range of 10 miles and it would be used things such as scuds and vehicles. I mention this because I don't believe it requires ammunition. I just mention this as another possibillity and to just throw it in there. So go ahead and discuss.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic