F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: F-16.net - HDAM - Harm Block VI :: F-16.net :: The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-6159.html
Printed on: 05 September 2008

Forum: F-16 Armament & Stores

HDAM - Harm Block VI



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Purplehaze
PostPosted: Aug 23, 2006 - 12:45 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 1175

Status: Offline
I just read the article <a href="news_article1938.html">F-16 successfully flight tests Block VI HARM</a>

Is the new block VI just a software upgrade? I remember testing both III's and IV's. Guess I'm getting old.

Purple
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Sep 05, 2008 - 7:12 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor






This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
   
 
Rocky_LC
PostPosted: Aug 23, 2006 - 05:02 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster


Joined: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 76

Status: Offline
I think what you may be talking about is the "HDAM". It's a upgrade of the system that provides GPS guidance capability.

Check it out. It looks like the mods are primarily in the control section and software.

http://www.raytheon.com/products/stelle ... 055752.pdf

Rocky
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
skrip00
PostPosted: Aug 23, 2006 - 06:42 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 535
Location: New Jersey, USA
Status: Offline
Also a millimeter-wave radar seeker that allows it to identify targets better.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Loomis
PostPosted: Aug 23, 2006 - 11:32 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster


Joined: May 31, 2005
Posts: 69
Location: Ft. Worth
Status: Offline
<i>millimeter-wave radar seeker</i>
You may be thinking of AARGM (AGM-88E). HARM doesn't use a MMW seeker.

AGM-88D/Block VI was originally the HARM PNU project. Germany, Italy and the US were partners in HARM PNU. The US dropped out of HARM PNU, effectively ending the project. USAF continued the project under HDAM (HARM Direct Attack Module), but has recently been reluctant to fund any production.

HDAM requires a new ALIC inside the LAU-118 and the new ALIC requires new software on the F-16, so HDAM is not backwards compatible to older F-16s.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
skrip00
PostPosted: Aug 23, 2006 - 11:54 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 535
Location: New Jersey, USA
Status: Offline
Ohhh, ok.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Purplehaze
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2006 - 12:15 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 1175

Status: Offline
From the outside it's still the old 88.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Lieven
PostPosted: Nov 24, 2006 - 10:02 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Webmaster
F-16.net Webmaster


Joined: May 23, 2003
Posts: 2295

An update: <a href="news_article2068.html">HDAM launched from an F-16 successfully hits target without radar guidance</a>
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Jan 19, 2007 - 03:20 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2831

A buck doesn't by what it used too. $300,000 for a HARM. Laughing

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
Rocky_LC
PostPosted: Jan 23, 2007 - 07:47 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster


Joined: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 76

Status: Offline
How much does an F-16 cost?

Or a 4 ship strike package?

Rocky
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Master-of-Disaster
PostPosted: Jan 23, 2007 - 12:52 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster


Joined: May 08, 2005
Posts: 57

Status: Offline
War is getting way to expensive.

_________________
When flying, always make sure the pointy end goes forward.
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
habu2
PostPosted: Jan 23, 2007 - 04:10 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Sep 05, 2003
Posts: 2804
Location: ACES II
Status: Offline
War has always been expensive. Sad Now the tools we use to kill people just cost a lot more.

_________________
Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
akruse21
PostPosted: Jan 23, 2007 - 04:27 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Jul 30, 2005
Posts: 739

Status: Offline
yeah we should go back to the days of lining up with muskets Sad
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
idesof
PostPosted: Feb 21, 2007 - 09:00 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: May 29, 2006
Posts: 640

Status: Offline
Any idea when this may be fielded?

Quote:
Raytheon HDAM Missile Successful in Test Flight Against Low-Power Radar Source

Wednesday February 21, 10:00 am ET

TUCSON, Ariz., Feb. 21, 2007 /PRNewswire/ -- Raytheon Company'sHDAM missile completed a series of free-flight tests by successfully engaging a radar system emitting low-power levels, a new accomplishment for an anti-radar missile. HDAM stands for HARM destruction of enemy air defense attack module.

The new HDAM variant adds INS/GPS (inertial navigation system/Global Positioning System) capability to the battle-proven HARM (High-speed anti- radiation missile), greatly improving HARM's effectiveness while eliminating the possibility of fratricide. Earlier test flights validated the missile's improved software and INS/GPS capabilities.

The third and final U.S. Air Force free-flight test of HDAM was the most challenging as the missile was fired against a low-power emitter. To fully test the missile's capability, the HDAM only looked for a low-power emitter source at a very close range to the target. In spite of these severe challenges, the missile successfully detected, engaged and attacked the low- power source.

The flight took place at the China Lake Test Range, Calif. The missile was launched 25 nautical miles (approximately 29 statute miles) away from the target by a Block 50 F-16 that was flying 0.8 Mach (more than 500 mph) at 25,000 feet. The HDAM then demonstrated its ability to execute the fastest time-critical attack of any air-to-surface weapons available to U.S. forces today. Results met Air Force expectations with a high level of target probability of destruction assessed.

HDAM flight tests have determined the new HARM version has long-distance, time-critical target attack with minimum supersonic flight time and precise accuracy and the capability to attack low-power targets quickly and efficiently from stand-off range.

"This test has clearly demonstrated the extended capabilities of the HDAM," said Jeff Wadsworth, the HARM program director at Raytheon Missile Systems in Tucson, Ariz. "The three successful HDAM flight tests concludes the highly successful cooperative research and development agreement providing the Air Force with an opportunity to upgrade its existing inventory to a system that can be utilized as a suppression or destruction of enemy air defenses weapon with additional capability as a high-speed strike weapon. HDAM can be a new, multi-role arrow in the Air Force warfighter's quiver."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Feb 22, 2007 - 12:38 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2831

Very interesting.... as this someday may fit inside F-22/F-35....

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
sprstdlyscottsmn
PostPosted: Feb 22, 2007 - 01:16 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Posts: 343

Status: Offline
what is the significance of striking a low pwer emission source? Is that like a system that is turned off or is that what the new systems do?

_________________
James,

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel