| Author |
Message |
|
Purplehaze
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2006 - 12:45 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 1175
Status: Offline
|
I just read the article <a href="news_article1938.html">F-16 successfully flight tests Block VI HARM</a>
Is the new block VI just a software upgrade? I remember testing both III's and IV's. Guess I'm getting old.
Purple |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Sep 05, 2008 - 7:12 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Rocky_LC
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2006 - 05:02 AM
|
|
|
Frequent Poster

Joined: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 76
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
skrip00
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2006 - 06:42 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 535
Location: New Jersey, USA
Status: Offline
|
| Also a millimeter-wave radar seeker that allows it to identify targets better. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Loomis
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2006 - 11:32 PM
|
|
|
Frequent Poster

Joined: May 31, 2005
Posts: 69
Location: Ft. Worth
Status: Offline
|
<i>millimeter-wave radar seeker</i>
You may be thinking of AARGM (AGM-88E). HARM doesn't use a MMW seeker.
AGM-88D/Block VI was originally the HARM PNU project. Germany, Italy and the US were partners in HARM PNU. The US dropped out of HARM PNU, effectively ending the project. USAF continued the project under HDAM (HARM Direct Attack Module), but has recently been reluctant to fund any production.
HDAM requires a new ALIC inside the LAU-118 and the new ALIC requires new software on the F-16, so HDAM is not backwards compatible to older F-16s. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
skrip00
|
Posted: Aug 23, 2006 - 11:54 PM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Posts: 535
Location: New Jersey, USA
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Purplehaze
|
Posted: Aug 24, 2006 - 12:15 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 1175
Status: Offline
|
| From the outside it's still the old 88. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lieven
|
Posted: Nov 24, 2006 - 10:02 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Webmaster

Joined: May 23, 2003
Posts: 2295
|
| An update: <a href="news_article2068.html">HDAM launched from an F-16 successfully hits target without radar guidance</a> |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Jan 19, 2007 - 03:20 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2831
|
A buck doesn't by what it used too. $300,000 for a HARM.  |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Rocky_LC
|
Posted: Jan 23, 2007 - 07:47 AM
|
|
|
Frequent Poster

Joined: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 76
Status: Offline
|
How much does an F-16 cost?
Or a 4 ship strike package?
Rocky |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Master-of-Disaster
|
Posted: Jan 23, 2007 - 12:52 PM
|
|
|
Frequent Poster

Joined: May 08, 2005
Posts: 57
Status: Offline
|
| War is getting way to expensive. |
_________________ When flying, always make sure the pointy end goes forward.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
habu2
|
Posted: Jan 23, 2007 - 04:10 PM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Sep 05, 2003
Posts: 2804
Location: ACES II
Status: Offline
|
War has always been expensive. Now the tools we use to kill people just cost a lot more. |
_________________ Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
 |
|
akruse21
|
Posted: Jan 23, 2007 - 04:27 PM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Jul 30, 2005
Posts: 739
Status: Offline
|
yeah we should go back to the days of lining up with muskets  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
idesof
|
Posted: Feb 21, 2007 - 09:00 PM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: May 29, 2006
Posts: 640
Status: Offline
|
Any idea when this may be fielded?
Quote:
Raytheon HDAM Missile Successful in Test Flight Against Low-Power Radar Source
Wednesday February 21, 10:00 am ET
TUCSON, Ariz., Feb. 21, 2007 /PRNewswire/ -- Raytheon Company'sHDAM missile completed a series of free-flight tests by successfully engaging a radar system emitting low-power levels, a new accomplishment for an anti-radar missile. HDAM stands for HARM destruction of enemy air defense attack module.
The new HDAM variant adds INS/GPS (inertial navigation system/Global Positioning System) capability to the battle-proven HARM (High-speed anti- radiation missile), greatly improving HARM's effectiveness while eliminating the possibility of fratricide. Earlier test flights validated the missile's improved software and INS/GPS capabilities.
The third and final U.S. Air Force free-flight test of HDAM was the most challenging as the missile was fired against a low-power emitter. To fully test the missile's capability, the HDAM only looked for a low-power emitter source at a very close range to the target. In spite of these severe challenges, the missile successfully detected, engaged and attacked the low- power source.
The flight took place at the China Lake Test Range, Calif. The missile was launched 25 nautical miles (approximately 29 statute miles) away from the target by a Block 50 F-16 that was flying 0.8 Mach (more than 500 mph) at 25,000 feet. The HDAM then demonstrated its ability to execute the fastest time-critical attack of any air-to-surface weapons available to U.S. forces today. Results met Air Force expectations with a high level of target probability of destruction assessed.
HDAM flight tests have determined the new HARM version has long-distance, time-critical target attack with minimum supersonic flight time and precise accuracy and the capability to attack low-power targets quickly and efficiently from stand-off range.
"This test has clearly demonstrated the extended capabilities of the HDAM," said Jeff Wadsworth, the HARM program director at Raytheon Missile Systems in Tucson, Ariz. "The three successful HDAM flight tests concludes the highly successful cooperative research and development agreement providing the Air Force with an opportunity to upgrade its existing inventory to a system that can be utilized as a suppression or destruction of enemy air defenses weapon with additional capability as a high-speed strike weapon. HDAM can be a new, multi-role arrow in the Air Force warfighter's quiver."
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Feb 22, 2007 - 12:38 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2831
|
| Very interesting.... as this someday may fit inside F-22/F-35.... |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
Posted: Feb 22, 2007 - 01:16 PM
|
|
|
Veteran

Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Posts: 343
Status: Offline
|
| what is the significance of striking a low pwer emission source? Is that like a system that is turned off or is that what the new systems do? |
_________________ James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|