Forum: Air Force Life

Billy Mitchell



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
vinnie
PostPosted: Jun 28, 2006 - 03:16 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 03:37 AM
Posts: 435

Status: Offline
Will there ever be another <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Mitchell" target="_blank">Billy Mitchell</a>? We need one now more than ever. I mean not just for the USAF, all the branches.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 27, 2012 - 1:58 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Dammerung
PostPosted: Jun 28, 2006 - 05:50 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jun 27, 2004 - 12:17 AM
Posts: 192

Status: Offline
Great thinkers come and go, and I'm sure there are a few warriors in the Pentagon doing what they can. People like Boyd, Mitchell, and the like come around only every few decades, real rare.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TenguNoHi
PostPosted: Jun 28, 2006 - 07:23 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Sep 29, 2004 - 05:24 AM
Posts: 920

Status: Offline
Sorry guys, I'm still in ROTC, but I should be a 2LT in a few years and maybe then I can get some pull till I get higher.

Laughing LMAO, j/k j/k

But seriously, if theres one thing id like to see its some revolutionary geniuses out there to help us out a bit.

-Aaron
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Rocky_LC
PostPosted: Jul 01, 2006 - 03:58 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Aug 21, 2004 - 07:03 AM
Posts: 99

Status: Offline
I say "No", because "back in the day" of Billy Mitchell, Ernst Udet, and many other luminaries - these guys were the "few" who really put some thought into the application of airpower.

Nowadays - we have thousands (tens of thousands?) of pilots flying, debriefing and applying "lessons learned". This guarantees that the progression of the the art of airpower continuously moves forward - as new aircraft are developed - their capabilities are explored to the fullest - and where deficiencies are observed - either mods / block updates are defined, and / or new aircraft developed (e.g F-22, B-2 bomber).

The brightest engineering minds are working at Boeing, Lockheed, and other airframers across the globe.

There will always be some sharp guys (e.g. that Kelly guy from the Skunk Works?) - but I predict you won't have "mavericks, bucking the establishment" singlehandedly "revolutionizing" air warfare.

Comments?

Rocky
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vinnie
PostPosted: Jul 01, 2006 - 04:13 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 03:37 AM
Posts: 435

Status: Offline
What I mean, is somebody going to sacrifice their career to get the message out to the public about what is happening to the Us military. Mitchell turned his court martial into a public forum
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Arctus
PostPosted: Jul 07, 2006 - 07:14 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: May 13, 2006 - 02:33 PM
Posts: 165

Status: Offline
Probably not. The occasional "maverick" will fall on his sword over principle but it probably won't get much play unless that guy is a 3 or 4 star and goes public on a poor news week.

_________________
354 FW Eielson 02-05
389 FS Mtn Home 99-02
54 & 90 FS Elmendorf 91-99
479 TTW Holloman 84-91
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2012 F-16.net