| Author |
Message |
|
aero_student
|
Posted: Jun 01, 2006 - 11:37 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jun 01, 2006 - 11:35 PM
Posts: 1
Status: Offline
|
Hey all,
I'm trying to simulate the ground effects on an f16 during landing. To do this, I need to have an estimate of the wing height above the ground during taxiing. I can't seem to find this spec anywhere and it's tough estimating from pictures. Does anyone have an idea??
Thanks and much appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 23, 2013 - 2:38 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VPRGUY
|
Posted: Jun 02, 2006 - 09:58 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Apr 24, 2005 - 07:03 PM
Posts: 853
Status: Offline
|
| The bottom of the wing is about 5'10" off the ground, give or take a few inches. |
_________________ Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
MKopack
|
Posted: Jun 02, 2006 - 10:23 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Apr 08, 2004 - 11:51 PM
Posts: 860
Location: North Carolina, USA
Status: Offline
|
On my Blk. 10 I could always check the servicing on my shock struts by walking under the wing, I could usually feel the wing on my hair, but not touch my head. I'm 5'9 1/2".
By the way, it only takes a single instance of a low strut to show the shortcoming (literally) of this method...
Mike |
_________________ F-16A/B/C/D P&W/GE Crew Chief and Phased Maint.
56TTW/63TFTS 1987-1989
401TFW/614TFS 1989-1991
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Habu
|
Posted: Jun 03, 2006 - 03:18 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Oct 21, 2003 - 06:12 AM
Posts: 2738
Status: Offline
|
| Simulate in what way? |
_________________ Do your homework, Tiger!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
AmmoCapt
|
Posted: Jun 08, 2006 - 07:37 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Nov 29, 2004 - 01:40 PM
Posts: 146
|
I'd have to say that the wing is 6 feet off of the ground (at the trailing edge), when there isn't too much weighing the jet down.
I'm 5 foot 10.5 barefoot, and my boots add another inch. Depending on the fuel and weapons load, I could walk right under the wing no problem. But as was said earlier, this method can prove painfully wrong if you aren't paying attention.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
blk40crewdawg
|
Posted: Jun 09, 2006 - 11:26 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 10, 2005 - 12:22 AM
Posts: 136
Status: Offline
|
| Don't forget that the Blk 1 - 30 are all the smaller landing gear and the 40 and up have the heavyweight gear. That makes a big difference in the wing height from the ground... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VPRGUY
|
Posted: Jun 10, 2006 - 12:22 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Apr 24, 2005 - 07:03 PM
Posts: 853
Status: Offline
|
| About 2-3 inches is all. |
_________________ Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Purplehaze
|
Posted: Jun 10, 2006 - 01:47 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 - 09:20 PM
Posts: 1232
Status: Offline
|
| I could never check struts like that....I'm 6'2', that wing hurts a lot trust me. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
cmjohnson
|
Posted: Sep 15, 2006 - 04:30 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Jul 07, 2003 - 09:48 PM
Posts: 109
Status: Offline
|
Just be glad the wing leading edge isn't like that on an F-104. Which specs out at being .014 inches thick.
That will certainly leave a mark if you walk into it. It's sharper at the edge than many axes that have a serviceable edge.
The Starfighter actually had leading edge guards that were placed on them for crew safety during ground servicing.
CJ |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
avionicsfaber
|
Posted: Apr 16, 2010 - 06:51 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Apr 16, 2010 - 06:44 PM
Posts: 2
Status: Offline
|
| Doesnt this depend on the loading and the amount of fuel the aircraft is taking with him? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
93-3542
|
Posted: Apr 16, 2010 - 08:08 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Mar 06, 2009 - 09:02 PM
Posts: 13
Location: ALASKA
Status: Offline
|
| its always between about 5'8 and 5'10 depending on loading the wings will flex a little and the jet will bounce while taxing there is a little dif between the heavy and lite landing gear but i'm 6'0 and have always had to duck my head under the wing and ive worked jets with both types of gear |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
johnwill
|
Posted: Apr 19, 2010 - 01:53 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Mar 24, 2007 - 09:06 PM
Posts: 1364
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Status: Offline
|
One reason the height doesn't change much with store and fuel weight is the the main gear shock struts are rigid at the load ranges involved. Only wing flex and tire compression are affected by the extra weight. If you jack the airplane off the main gear, then lower it slowly, you will see the shock struts compress up to a point, then become rigid. When the airplane is fully supported by the gear, the struts are still rigid. At all normal loaded weights, the struts remain rigid. If you were to somehow grossly overload the airplane, the struts would then begin to compress until they reached full compression.
The struts are designed this way to prevent the airplane from rolling (roll axis, not tire rolling) while making a turn during taxiing. So, during taxi, only the tires act as springs, with no help from the struts. Normally the only time the struts are compressed past the static rigid condition is at landing touchdown, when the load on the main gear may reach three times the static load. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|