| Author |
Message |
|
Milhouse
|
Posted: Jul 06, 2004 - 06:30 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jun 04, 2004
Posts: 7
Status: Offline
|
|
sparrow187 wrote:
There are I belive 2 jets ( F-16's) at edwards that run chase for the f-22 that are referred to as go-fast jets. They have completely different engines in them for the sole purpose of keeping up with the f-22.
Don't know about that but a standard bk 30 from Springfield Oh ANG was sent as a chase for the F-22. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Oct 13, 2008 - 1:05 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
RyanCollins
|
Posted: Nov 07, 2004 - 07:04 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 07, 2004
Posts: 603
Status: Offline
|
I heard about the recon version of MiG-25. I think that plane reached
M3.2 or M3.3, not sure... If somebody knows, please notify... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
calhoun
|
Posted: Nov 07, 2004 - 09:22 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Posts: 138
Status: Offline
|
|
Milhouse wrote:
sparrow187 wrote:
There are I belive 2 jets ( F-16's) at edwards that run chase for the f-22 that are referred to as go-fast jets. They have completely different engines in them for the sole purpose of keeping up with the f-22.
Don't know about that but a standard bk 30 from Springfield Oh ANG was sent as a chase for the F-22.
A block 30 would be VERY hard pressed to keep up |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Delta
|
Posted: Nov 07, 2004 - 10:31 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 27, 2004
Posts: 124
Status: Offline
|
| I'm curious to see what Mach numbers Viper pilots on here have seen. |
_________________ USAFA Class of 2009 "HUB!"
|
|
|
|
 |
|
RSAF-G2
|
Posted: Nov 15, 2004 - 12:07 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Apr 17, 2004
Posts: 55
Location: Republic of Singapore
Status: Offline
|
| I've seen 1.9, clean jet at FL32, full AFB |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
STBYGAIN
|
Posted: Nov 15, 2004 - 01:27 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Posts: 188
Location: RJSM -- Japan
Status: Offline
|
| That's got me beat, I've only seen 1.4, up near FL500. I see between 1.0 and 1.1 almost every air-air flight. I have 'supercruised' for a good five minutes or so though, although it's supposed to be more than my 1.02 to really qualify. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Cylon
|
Posted: Nov 16, 2004 - 01:00 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Dec 09, 2003
Posts: 337
Status: Offline
|
1.94 @ 22K (successful over-speed of centerline tank I might add).
Cylon |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Nov 16, 2004 - 07:47 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2848
|
|
Cylon wrote:
1.94 @ 22K (successful over-speed of centerline tank I might add).
Cylon
 |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Pat1
|
Posted: Nov 17, 2004 - 07:32 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Oct 07, 2004
Posts: 235
Status: Offline
|
| The X-15 achieved speeds over mach 6, but don't think it is "air-breathing". Today the X-43 (ramjet) achieved a speed of almost mach 10 though it is un-manned. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
RyanCollins
|
Posted: Nov 17, 2004 - 10:17 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 07, 2004
Posts: 603
Status: Offline
|
| What was the max speed of the XB-70 Valkyrie? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
habu2
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2004 - 12:17 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 05, 2003
Posts: 2804
Location: ACES II
Status: Offline
|
Top recorded speed for the Valkyrie was 2020 MPH at 72,000 ft on 12 Jan 1966 by AV2, crew White & Cotton, equivalent Mach was M3.06. Achieved 4 minutes of M3.0+ time on this flight.
Top recorded Mach for the Valkyrie was M3.08 at 72,800 ft on 12 April 1966 by AV2, crew White & Cotton, equivalent speed was 2000 MPH. Achieved 20 minutes of M3.0+ time on this flight.
Together both XB-70s flew only 129 times, and spent 1 hr 43 min at or over M3.0.
I don't know why, but all my reference books on the flight records for the Valkyrie list top speeds in MPH, not knots.  |
_________________ Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Pat1
|
Posted: Nov 18, 2004 - 01:39 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Oct 07, 2004
Posts: 235
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
RyanCollins
|
Posted: Nov 20, 2004 - 09:55 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 07, 2004
Posts: 603
Status: Offline
|
I got this information for the YE-266 (MiG-25 Foxbat-A), who broke the speed record for a fighter jet:
Type: Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 "Foxbat-A" single-seat interceptor.
Engines: two 27,010-lb (12,250-kg) reheated thrust Tumanskii R-31 turbojets.
Performance: maximum speed 2,115 mph (3,404 km/h) or Mach 3.2 at 36,090 ft (11,000 m); initial climb rate 41,010 ft (12,500 m) per minute; Service ceiling 80,05011 (24,400 m); radius 702 miles (1,130 km).
Weights: empty 44,092 lb (20,000 kg); maximum take-off 37,425 lb (17,011 kg). |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Eagle
|
Posted: Nov 21, 2004 - 03:40 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Apr 13, 2004
Posts: 64
Status: Offline
|
"the Helios satellite obriting the sun travels at Mach 227.3. "
That is total BS. It travels at Mach 0. You cannot have a Mach number without an atmosphere. Of course we all know that. I don't think the Raptor can be outrun by the superbug either. |
_________________ “Audacity, audacity-always audacity.” General Patton
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Pat1
|
Posted: Nov 21, 2004 - 06:06 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Oct 07, 2004
Posts: 235
Status: Offline
|
| I think they just refer to some avarage speed (or max?, since the article is about max speeds) measured relative to the sun (as if you are viewing it from its surface) and then compare it to an avarge value of speed of sound in our atmosphere. I suppose the sun since its the object it is orbiting... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|