Forum: Military Aircraft of the Cold War

OV-10 Bronco



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
MKopack
PostPosted: Apr 17, 2006 - 04:24 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Apr 08, 2004 - 11:51 PM
Posts: 860
Location: North Carolina, USA
Status: Offline
USMC Looks To Revive OV-10s For Use In Iraq

By Joshua Kucera, JDW Staff Reporter, Washington, DC

Jane's Defence Weekly
April 12, 2006

The U.S. Marine Corps is looking at the possibility of reviving the retired
OV-10 Bronco observation aircraft for use in Iraq, according to a top service
official.

The aircraft, which was retired from U.S. service in 1994, would be used to
augment surveillance of roads in Iraq.

Having additional aircraft there could increase the chances of U.S. forces
detecting the emplacement of roadside bombs or improvised explosive devices (IEDs), some service officials believe.

"If this is a capability we think that will take out the IED or help us
catch the IED maker ... you bet [we are interested]," a senior marine commander told Jane's.

Service officials, with the help of an association of retired OV-10 pilots,
have identified aircraft and pilots that could be used in Iraq, he said.

The Marine Corps Warfighting Laboratory has been tasked to examine the cost of such a plan and the concept of operations it might use, the
commander added.

However, not all marine officials are enamoured with the idea.

Lieutenant General John Castellaw, the service's deputy commandant for
aviation, told Jane's he thought the experience of the Gulf War showed that the aircraft was too vulnerable.

Marsh Aviation, which manages the inventory of the government-owned OV-10s and does upgrade work for international OV-10 customers, could
remanufacture 10 or 12 of the aircraft suitable for military use by piecing
together parts of various aircraft, said Floyd Stilwell, Marsh Aviation's chief
executive officer.

The company could start delivering aircraft within 10 months at a normal
production rate and faster if the government paid for it, Stilwell said.

The OV-10 proposal is one of many schemes - often secretive - to revive
retired aircraft or convert civilian aircraft for use in operations in Iraq and
elsewhere.

The U.S. Army has converted at least three Shorts 360-300 aircraft under the name Constant Hawk to do surveillance in Iraq and the sea lanes
of the Middle East. Two of the aircraft collided with each other in Wisconsin in
February shortly before they were to be sent to Iraq.

Mohawk Technologies of Florida has operated a fleet of six OV-1 Mohawk
reconnaissance aircraft under a U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) contract for about 12 months, said Paul Pefley, the company's president. Pefley
declined to say where the aircraft were being operated or for which branch of the DoD. The OV-1 was retired from U.S. Army use in 1996.

Most of the non-traditional aircraft plans, however, have gone nowhere and
have been openly advocated only by a collection of veterans associations and a handful of members of Congress.

There is a growing constituency, however, of people who believe that
Soldiers and Marines in Iraq need better real-time intelligence and look back to the Vietnam-era Forward Air Controllers (FACs) as a model of how
counterinsurgency can be fought from the air.

Those FACs were more tightly integrated with small units than the surveillance aircraft used today, and more effective, the Congressional staff member said.

"The air force is looking at all this, but very quietly," he said. "There's
really a gap in combat information at a platoon commander, convoy
leader level that is real and as real-time as you can hope to have it. We've
got dozens of systems operating over there but there's a big logjam in the
[intelligence] pipeline, and everyone knows it."
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 21, 2013 - 1:36 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Apr 17, 2006 - 05:28 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147

What is suprising is that if you know you are going to do a bug hunt in region x, there should be 24/7 UAV coverage that also has eyes on the patrol(s). Are the Marines left out in the cold again by virtue of not having access to assets that are already in theater?

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
FlightDreamz
PostPosted: Nov 28, 2008 - 08:17 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 18, 2007 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 646
Location: Long Island, New York
Status: Offline
The OV-10 was a great aircraft (especially the OV-10D model with the gun turrent in the rear). But I don't think its very survivable in a modern battlefield. I think the marines would be better served by an U.A.V. doing recon, and I agree with Elp - why isn't this being done already?

_________________
A fighter without a gun . . . is like an airplane without a wing.— Brigadier General Robin Olds, USAF.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Elliboom
PostPosted: Dec 01, 2008 - 01:34 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Apr 05, 2006 - 07:21 PM
Posts: 426
Location: Lincoln, NE
Status: Offline
The answer to why it's not being done already is because the USAF was being ran by a bunch of fighter guys fro way to long, a bunch of fighter guys who could not see the true value of UAV's and almost refused to send the ground commanders what they wanted and desperately needed. Hopefully those days are behind us and we can start giving the boys on the ground the tools they need to win the fight. It's obvious that they are tired of waiting for the USAF to give them the tools, so they are taking matters into their own hands. Semper Fi I say.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
asiatrails
PostPosted: Dec 02, 2008 - 05:03 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 30, 2005 - 03:11 AM
Posts: 865

Status: Offline
At the end of their life the OV-10's had massive corrosion problems due to the lower wing skins being made of magnesium alloy. The forest service has at least one of their aircraft grounded for this problem right now.

I think that they could make the T6 Texan into a CAS aircraft with ATHS better and faster than they could revive the Bronco.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
FlightDreamz
PostPosted: Dec 04, 2008 - 03:18 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 18, 2007 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 646
Location: Long Island, New York
Status: Offline
The T6 Texan proposal reminds me a lot of the Navy's AH-1 Skyraiders (of Vietnam era). I still think such an aircraft would be way too vulnerable to AAA over a modern battlefield. Two Cents

_________________
A fighter without a gun . . . is like an airplane without a wing.— Brigadier General Robin Olds, USAF.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
TC
PostPosted: Dec 04, 2008 - 03:48 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 4006

Status: Offline
Over 2 years later, and this idea went nowhere, and is effectively dead. The Marines will not be returning the Bronco to service.

So, in the interest of discussing a great FAC aircraft from Vietnam and the Gulf War, I've decided to change it up a little bit...a new thread name could bring about a more broad topic.

It would be great to hear from anyone with experience around the Bronco.

The PAVE NAIL missions would be especially interesting to hear about...Gums, you up?

_________________
"He counted on America to be passive...He counted wrong." -- President Ronald Reagan
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
asiatrails
PostPosted: Dec 04, 2008 - 04:18 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 30, 2005 - 03:11 AM
Posts: 865

Status: Offline
TC in the interests of opening up the discussion can I offer up the Piper Enforcer - the ability to deliver FAC with style. This is not your grandad's Mustang. Probably does not have enough P sub S to get out of a high threat environment but should be good for convoy cover and local encounters.

Picture is from Wikipedia


.



Piper_PA48_Enforcer_USAF.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  270.75 KB
 Viewed:  6380 Time(s)

Piper_PA48_Enforcer_USAF.jpg


 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TC
PostPosted: Dec 04, 2008 - 04:30 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 4006

Status: Offline
I've heard of this one before. There's one on display at Wright Pat. Interesting development of what was one of the best fighters ever built.

_________________
"He counted on America to be passive...He counted wrong." -- President Ronald Reagan
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
asiatrails
PostPosted: Dec 05, 2008 - 03:13 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 30, 2005 - 03:11 AM
Posts: 865

Status: Offline
TC You might as well look good when you are giving someone a bad day.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TC
PostPosted: Dec 05, 2008 - 04:17 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 07:06 AM
Posts: 4006

Status: Offline
Sort of like Sharon Stone's philosophy...

_________________
"He counted on America to be passive...He counted wrong." -- President Ronald Reagan
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
asiatrails
PostPosted: Dec 05, 2008 - 05:29 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 30, 2005 - 03:11 AM
Posts: 865

Status: Offline
You just had to ask . . . .

Picture is from Google, nice cigar & socks !!!

<<edit>>
(Sorry Asia, I had to keep it "Disney Channel" around here)



sharon_stone.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  71.7 KB
 Viewed:  6321 Time(s)

sharon_stone.jpg




Last edited by asiatrails on Dec 05, 2008 - 05:34 AM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
StolichnayaStrafer
PostPosted: Dec 05, 2008 - 02:39 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 20, 2008 - 04:50 PM
Posts: 854
Location: Dodge City, Moscowchusetts
Status: Offline
Shocked

_________________
Why is the vodka gone?
Why is the vodka always gone... oh- that's why!
Hide the vodka!!!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
FlightDreamz
PostPosted: Sep 12, 2009 - 01:29 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 18, 2007 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 646
Location: Long Island, New York
Status: Offline
Looks like the OV-10 Bronco isn't dead yet according to this flightglobal blog http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-d ... 0x-br.html
And Asiatrails might be happy to hear that an PA-48 Enforcer and an upgraded AT-6 are also in the running.

_________________
A fighter without a gun . . . is like an airplane without a wing.— Brigadier General Robin Olds, USAF.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
darkvarkguy
PostPosted: Sep 12, 2009 - 02:58 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 05, 2009 - 06:01 AM
Posts: 366
Location: Raleigh, NC
Status: Offline
Osan was giving incentive rides to us A-10 Crew Chiefs in the OV-10 (for obvious reasons) and guys were saying it was the SCARIEST ride they ever had. They were flying in between trees!!

_________________
FB-111A Pease AFB 82-87
A-10A Suwon AB ROK 87-88
FB-111A/F-111G Pease AFB 88-90
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic