Forum: F-22A Raptor

Time-to-climb record attempt - F-22A Raptor



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
johnwill
PostPosted: Dec 15, 2007 - 05:23 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Mar 24, 2007
Posts: 364
Location: Fort Worth
Status: Offline
Interesting comments about the F-14 at 1.35 mach on the deck. However it seems that losing access panels is a subtle hint that maybe they went just a bit too fast. I'm not surprised the Tomcat could do it, since it is in many ways similar to the F-111. In flight test (with TF-30 engines), the F-111 got to 890 CAS at around 3000 ft., essentially the same as the F-14 condition. No access panels were lost.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Jul 24, 2008 - 7:43 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor






This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
   
 
Obi_Offiah
PostPosted: Dec 16, 2007 - 02:15 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active member
Active member


Joined: Mar 27, 2004
Posts: 113
Location: London
Status: Offline
There's and ex F-111 pilot who posted that he had taken an F-111D with pylons racks a couple of SUU-20s and an ECM pod up to mach 1.35 on the deck. He also mentioned that colleagues had said they had taken the F model up to mach 1.4 with less than all five AB zones lit Shocked

Obi
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Corsair1963
PostPosted: Dec 16, 2007 - 04:08 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Dec 19, 2005
Posts: 621

Status: Offline
sprstdlyscottsmn wrote:
About the Low Speed record, I picked up a book about the Tomcat that is full of interviews with pilots, RIOs, and crew chiefs. In reguards to the F110 powered birds one interview said that for a special operation they got the NATOPS speed limit lifted and flew fast enough to tear off acess panels while another interview said they pushed 1.35M on the deck, which translates to roughly 890 KTAS or ~1030mph. That one interview is the only one to put out numbers, but all the flight crew who flew/rode the GE powered cats say it was fast beyond reason. The Tomcat TF30 was also a wider engine than the F110 so it has much more room to fit larger more powerfull engines and I believe that F119 was dimensionally compatible to the cats engine bay. If ~56K thrust took the F-14 to 1000 mph I imagine 70K could take it to 1150mph given that drag increases as a square of speed, but that us a moot point as 1030 mph already tore off panels and there is no knowing how the F119 and F110 compare in installed high speed low alt thrust.

As for the origional topic, the F119 is a thirsty engine at max power, but how long are you even going to need it running at max power for a TTC attempt? 4min? 5? Up at alt it wont use nearly the same amount of fuel and the engine can be near idle for most the trip back down so you could get away with 7-10k lb fuel possibly. ~40K lb wieght and 70K thrust.... makes me all warm and tingly inside. Besides, 1.7 Mach W/O AB at 60K feet?? That is a fast moving high altitude plane anyway you slice it.

This has been a fun thread to read, I learned much about BPR and their affects on performance. I tended to be more of an aerodynamics kind of guy in school, but wasnt bad at S&C either.



Interesting story! Wink


FLY NAVY Cool
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel