Forum: General F-22A Raptor forum

Seeking information regarding F-22A cockpit



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Spidermann
PostPosted: Mar 25, 2006 - 06:05 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 25, 2006 - 05:33 AM
Posts: 7

Status: Offline
Hello all!

I am currently creating an add-on aircraft for MSFlight Simulator, and can't seem to figure out what some (or most) of the switches and dials in the "office" pertain to. I've got a fairly decent picture of the cockpit, but it's not quite focused enough to read the labling on the panels (perhaps for a reason).

If anyone might be able to help, or if this information is not to be released, please let me know. Any info would be appreciated, though I've got all the info I need on the "glass" displays, just not the little switches and knobs and such.

Also if you would like to see the picture I've got of the cockpit, let me know.

Again if any of this information is considered 'sensitive', please let me know, as I'm just an ignorant civilian, after all. Rolling Eyes

Thanks for your time!

-Spider
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 23, 2013 - 1:50 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Raptor_DCTR
PostPosted: Mar 25, 2006 - 07:18 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: May 23, 2005 - 03:13 AM
Posts: 661

Status: Offline
Spidermann, I would guess (again just a guess. I am a viper maintainer and am not quite sure on all f-22A subject matter) that most of the cockpit controls are considered need to know or are at some level of classification since this aircraft is so new and considering it's extremely advanced capabilities. Most of the time though, it's not the actual panels that are classified rather it's the functions they perform. That is about as far as I'm willing to go without getting myself in trouble. The Air Force is very sensitive when it comes to security issues. Any thing else anyone can add would help. Again I am not real sure about the F-22A, but that is my 2 cents.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Spidermann
PostPosted: Mar 25, 2006 - 08:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 25, 2006 - 05:33 AM
Posts: 7

Status: Offline
Raptor_DCTR, thanks for the reply. I sorta thought I would get something to that effect, but I had to try. My reasoning was that if the picture I found was released, and the Technology Demonstrator simulator is being shown to the general public, then what the knobs are labled should be [Link pending approval] to ask about. I thought, like you said, that the functions rather than the panel themselves would be classified. But, then again, what do I know, really.

Anyone else that can chime in on this subject, as Raptor_DCTR stated, would be helpful. I don't want to get anyone in hot water, so anything is appreciated.

Thanks again.

-Spider
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Raptor_DCTR
PostPosted: Mar 25, 2006 - 08:35 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: May 23, 2005 - 03:13 AM
Posts: 661

Status: Offline
If pics have been released and there is a simulater then that leads me to believe that the panels themselves are not classified but rather their specific functions. I hope someday to get on the F-22A program. They are taking some viper specs right now and I have been trying but no luck so far. It is probably one of the most desired assignments in the AF right now.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Spidermann
PostPosted: Mar 25, 2006 - 11:05 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 25, 2006 - 05:33 AM
Posts: 7

Status: Offline
Quote:
It is probably one of the most desired assignments in the AF right now.


I'll bet it is. Must be cool to just plug in a "laptop" and do a diagnostic like you would for a new Buick. Smile

Quote:
Because maintainers were included early on in the design process for the F/A-22, they quickly established a strong foothold. To improve turnaround, the maintainers insisted on extensive self-diagnostics for the various subsystems.

This means virtually every piece of hardware in the aircraft either does its own health checks or reports when it has failed. It is reasoned that if the airplane knows so much about itself, then that capability can be leveraged to help both the maintainer and the pilot.

Source: Christine Sullivan - 325th Fighter Wing Public Affairs


above from a post at [url][Link pending approval][/url]


By the way here's the picture as referenced and the source document:


Thanks once more.

-Spider



Cockpit - Panel.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  83.61 KB
 Viewed:  54257 Time(s)

Cockpit - Panel.jpg



AVIlockheed2j.pdf
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  AVIlockheed2j.pdf
 Filesize:  772.76 KB
 Downloaded:  1240 Time(s)

 View user's profile Send private message  
 
swanee
PostPosted: Mar 25, 2006 - 11:20 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 25, 2005 - 11:08 PM
Posts: 531

Status: Offline
I am suprised that they have released an image of that much of the cockpit... (now which one of these buttons builds the nuke bomb out of household materials? Laughing Wink )

When they released the A-10c cockpit, they took out a couple of things before they photographed it....

_________________
Life is too short for ugly sailboats, fat women and bad beer!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Spidermann
PostPosted: Mar 26, 2006 - 05:54 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 25, 2006 - 05:33 AM
Posts: 7

Status: Offline
[quote]...they took out a couple of things before they photographed [Link pending approval]]

I agree. If you look closely, there are a couple of 'blanks' in pretty prime real estate. I assume one would be for nuke consent like on the F-16 panel, but it may be for some EW thing that they don't want released. I don't know, and I don't want to, either. Smile

Most of the critical systems are run from the MFD's, and like one test pilot said in an interview I read; "....every switch had to earn it's way into the [Link pending approval]"

Some of the stuff I can figure out by deductive reasoning, like the gear panel, misc. systems next to it (landing lights, strobe, nav lights, tail hook), aux com (on the right near the bottom with the digital display), and oxygen systems below that. The rest I'm not so sure about, maybe volume control, fuel systems and the like. I've tried cross checking against the F-16c, F-15 (I've got a really detailed panel schematic for the -15 if anyone needs it.) and various commercial jets (like the A-380) but nothing seems to 'fit' in comparison. It's likely that all the switch panels are custom designed and manufactured specifically for the Raptor's systems.

[Link pending approval] biggie, I just wanted to make it as accurate as I could as to adequately represent the awesome F-22A. Great plane, great nationwide teamwork, and great design and performance. IMHO, my tax dollars have been spent on the coolest thing since GPS. [insert "waste, waste" comments here. Smile

My hat goes off to all the talented equipment between the headphones, as well!! The plane might be high tech, but it can't fly itself.

Let me know if anything else comes to mind.

-Spider
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Spidermann
PostPosted: Mar 26, 2006 - 12:27 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 25, 2006 - 05:33 AM
Posts: 7

Status: Offline
Sorry to post twice in a [Link pending approval] but I found some more info.

Here's a company that makes some of the simulators and training equipment:
[url][Link pending approval][/url]


And this is the Data and Video Recorder (DMVR) at the lowest right in the picture:
[url][Link pending approval][/url]


Have fun!

-Spider
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Mar 27, 2006 - 10:30 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147

It isn't the displays and gizmos.... it is what the displays and gizmos project when they are "on"... Laughing

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
swanee
PostPosted: Mar 27, 2006 - 10:36 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 25, 2005 - 11:08 PM
Posts: 531

Status: Offline
Spidermann wrote:


IMHO, my tax dollars have been spent on the coolest thing since GPS.
-Spider




I agree, GPS is one of the coolest and must useful things to go (sorry to steal the phrase from the discovery channel) tactical to practical...

_________________
Life is too short for ugly sailboats, fat women and bad beer!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LinkF16SimDude
PostPosted: Mar 28, 2006 - 09:43 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2365

Status: Offline
I thought L-3/Link built the FMT for the Raptor? That's definately a Link dome viz. Saw one first-hand at Tucson last year.

(from USM Inc.)



main_01.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  69.02 KB
 Viewed:  53786 Time(s)

main_01.jpg


 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Spidermann
PostPosted: Mar 29, 2006 - 03:51 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 25, 2006 - 05:33 AM
Posts: 7

Status: Offline
Quote:
I thought L-3/Link built the FMT for the Raptor? That's definately a Link dome viz.


You're absolutely correct. L-3/Link does put together three trainers for the F-22A; the FMT, the weapons trainer, and the egress trainer. However, USM actually makes the equipment. [Link pending approval] the plastic and metal housing. Here's two pictures of what I'm talking about:





Then it gets shiped to L-3 for the software and stuff (I think thats how it goes, I could be wrong though).

That make sense?

-Spider
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LinkF16SimDude
PostPosted: Mar 29, 2006 - 03:55 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Jan 31, 2004 - 07:18 PM
Posts: 2365

Status: Offline
Yeah....thanks. Shoulda remembered that. When Link was bought by CAE (a Canadian company) in the late 80's, it's manufacturing capabilities were gutted and all the fab folks were "released". Those were indeed dark days in Binghamton and it hasn't been the same there since. Except for one or two WST rework projects, all subsequent new hardware build-up has been outsourced, to the best of my knowledge.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
mkfrazie
PostPosted: Mar 29, 2006 - 08:09 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Sep 19, 2003 - 09:25 PM
Posts: 11

Status: Offline
Pick up a copy of this book: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/185780 ... oding=UTF8

It has some detailed pics of the cockpit and you can make out some of the wording for the various switches etc.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Spidermann
PostPosted: Mar 30, 2006 - 01:26 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 25, 2006 - 05:33 AM
Posts: 7

Status: Offline
Sweet! Thanks!

I'll definately check it out, and when I can I'll post a schematic for everybody to take a look at (it might take some time, so be patient Very Happy )

Later!

-Spider
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic