Forum: F-22A Raptor

Shooting down a Raptor via IR tracking



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
franciwzm
PostPosted: Jan 13, 2006 - 12:01 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jan 13, 2006 - 11:55 AM
Posts: 1

Status: Offline
Could be a Raptor be shooted down by a Typhoon via IR tracking?
(Germans are working on a double seeker radar-IR for meteor )

Thyphoon current IR seeker is pretended to be able to lock on a Raptor
8-80 km far away.( It is supposed to be very susceptible to weather conditions)

Would it be possible for Europe to develop a more effective IR seker for Typhoon?

Any contribution is welcome.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 27, 2012 - 1:37 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
falconfixer860261
PostPosted: Jan 13, 2006 - 02:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: May 17, 2005 - 04:21 PM
Posts: 984

Status: Offline
Technology is always advancing. Nearly every weapons advance has eventually been countered. It just takes talent and money. Somebody, someday may be able to counter the superiority of the Raptor. It just depends on whether or not they have the money and want to spend it on that.

Please don't construe this as an answer to your question. I don't know anything about that and couldn't answer if I did.

Just remember you have to get close enough to shoot a missile and with current capabilities that will be hard to do against the Raptor.


Last edited by falconfixer860261 on Jan 13, 2006 - 04:49 PM; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
parrothead
PostPosted: Jan 13, 2006 - 04:43 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 11, 2004 - 12:04 AM
Posts: 3280

Status: Offline
I can't remember exactly where I read it, but I seem to recall seeing that a Raptor has tracked and locked onto targets as far as 300+ miles away. Now, I know we don't have missiles with that range, but I'm willing to bet that he'll know where you are and what you're doing while he's far enough out so that he can come up on your 6 and then bring you into range of his AMRAAMs.

I'd say no way you'll ever get to take the shot.

_________________
No plane on Sunday, maybe be one come Monday...
www.parrotheadjeff.com
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
VMF-214
PostPosted: Jan 13, 2006 - 08:10 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Nov 21, 2005 - 12:24 AM
Posts: 65

Also you must to consider that if IR homming could be a treat, the Raptor could be equipped (if isn't already) with DIRCM.

_________________
BAH BAH ...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
avon1944
PostPosted: Jan 15, 2006 - 09:39 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Nov 24, 2004 - 02:03 AM
Posts: 387

Status: Offline
parrothead wrote:
I seem to recall seeing that a Raptor has tracked and locked onto targets as far as 300+ miles away.

Yes.... by way of the data link. In the 03/13/00 issue of Aviation Leak" page 26 there is an article "F-22 Radar Ranges Pass Expectation" by David Fulghum. In the article he writes;
"While it's true that the F-22 AESA radar's typical operating range is 120mi. or less, that distance is driven by the need to lower or derate its output power."
"By limiting the strength of signal output, dividing the signal into several frequency bands, frequency hopping and limiting the radar's field of view, the F-22 should be able to avoid detection even when using its radar."
"The radar ranges of AESA-equipped aircraft stair-step down from a specified 90 mi. for the Joint Strike Fighter, through the F-15 and AESA, to a projected 70 mi. for the Block 60 F-16. All ranges are predicated against a 1-meter-square target."
"At maximum range, the F-22 is specified to have a 86% probability of detection of a 1-meter target with a single radar hit. A 1-meter target would be about the size of a cruise missile"


VMF-214 wrote:
Also you must to consider that if IR homming could be a treat, the Raptor could be equipped (if isn't already) with DIRCM.

It is and in 2008 during the modifications then, the F-22 will recieve a IR array detection system (IRST). One detector just below the radar antenna and one detector in each of the wing roots!

Adrian
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
danhutmacher
PostPosted: Jan 15, 2006 - 11:04 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jan 01, 2005 - 01:46 PM
Posts: 130

Status: Offline
Of course it could. The trick though will be getting close enough and in the right position to fire the IR missile.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
boff180
PostPosted: Jan 15, 2006 - 11:34 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jun 29, 2005 - 11:58 AM
Posts: 895

Status: Offline
You may like to know that there are 2 Typhoons now permanently deployed to the states....

Originally for testing duties however according to pilots from the squadron involved (17) the USAF are also now paying the RAF to use them for the F-22 as close in (I know you guys say "but BVR it will never get close in"; you still need to TRAIN for it just in case) aggressors. As its been discovered the Typhoon is the only thing that can hold its own and even defeat it in the WVR arena!

Oh and for definitive mass typhoon v f-22 engagements... keep your eyes on RAF Lakenheath in the next 6 weeks Wink

Andy
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
The_Mastiff
PostPosted: Jan 15, 2006 - 01:46 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Oct 05, 2005 - 02:45 PM
Posts: 116
Location: Raleigh NC
Status: Offline
Quote:

Yes.... by way of the data link. In the 03/13/00 issue of Aviation Leak" page 26 there is an article "F-22 Radar Ranges Pass Expectation" by David Fulghum. In the article he writes;
"While it's true that the F-22 AESA radar's typical operating range is 120mi. or less, that distance is driven by the need to lower or derate its output power."


The Raptor has tracked targets as far as 320 miles away with it's own power. It is an AESA with 8,000 watts after all. The LPOI mode is what Avon 1944 is referring to and it is a pilot selectable mode.

Boff 180, It's good they are using the opportunity to train against the Raptors. There's no reason it shouldn't hold it's own up close with Raptor, or any other aircraft in the world.

Quote:

Oh and for definitive mass typhoon v f-22 engagements... keep your eyes on RAF Lakenheath in the next 6 weeks


Will they be using an over water training area? Limiting both aircraft to subsonic engagements gives no indication of the real performance of either aircraft. We are talking about the two best performing fighters in the world in the high speed envelope after all.

Please keep us informed if you hear anything. Thanks, JL Raleigh NC
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
boff180
PostPosted: Jan 15, 2006 - 07:27 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jun 29, 2005 - 11:58 AM
Posts: 895

Status: Offline
I don't know anything else myself at the moment, I found out about it Wednesday... the guy that told me did know dates but wouldn't tell me as it would get a few Typhoon jocks in deep trouble Smile

Andy

_________________
Andy Evans Aviation Photography
www.evansaviography.co.uk
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
snypa777
PostPosted: Jan 16, 2006 - 01:59 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 26, 2005 - 03:00 AM
Posts: 1506

Status: Offline
From close in, any good IR missile with a good imaging seeker will be able to down an F-22, the Raptor only has to be a few degrees in temp` above background levels to be seen with today`s technology. There is some very smart seeker tech` out there....The trick is getting in close in the first place..good luck!

_________________
"I may not agree with what you say....but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
snypa777
PostPosted: Jan 16, 2006 - 02:30 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 26, 2005 - 03:00 AM
Posts: 1506

Status: Offline
Other things to think about...Aircraft outer parts get hot, depending on speed, altitude, etc...The F-22 has wing leading edge cooling, a special IR signature reducing topcoat and a special paint on engine nozzles that acts as a RAM and IR suppression coating. IR sensors are good at seeing jet wake, so
the F-22 can supercruise, this means even lower IR emissions in dry power as opposed to full afterburner. Don`t see much engine masking, as on the B-2 and F-117, so the designers have made some compromises because it is a fighter first and foremost. IR supression is done by other means.

IR detection can be adversely affected by weather, moisture content in the air, etc...smart seekers can adjust the bands that they use for detection though, typically from 1 to 12 microns. The trick for plane makers and IR emissivity guys is keeping the emissions low over a broad frequency range. I bet a LOT of work has been done on the F-22 in that arena!

_________________
"I may not agree with what you say....but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Guysmiley
PostPosted: Jan 16, 2006 - 07:03 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496

snypa777 wrote:
typically from 1 to 12 microns


Pendantic, I know, but that's about the WHOLE IR spectrum (well near IR anyway, far IR kinda mushes into visible). The atmospheric 'holes' are mostly at 3 to 4 µm and at 8 to 12 µm.

I seem to recall a discussion about the F-22's supercruise ability. Just because the engines aren't in AB doesn't mean their fuel flow is low. At full MIL power they burn a LOT of gas, it's the price you pay for all that dry power.

Engines as powerful as the F-22s will show up on IR, but you first have to get into IR range of it... and that is gonna be HARD.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
cru
PostPosted: Jan 16, 2006 - 07:11 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Dec 17, 2004 - 08:25 AM
Posts: 217

Status: Offline
Quote:
As its been discovered the Typhoon is the only thing that can hold its own and even defeat it in the WVR arena!


Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing

I heard something else; the Tornado can take the F 22 in BVR...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
snypa777
PostPosted: Jan 16, 2006 - 02:37 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 26, 2005 - 03:00 AM
Posts: 1506

Status: Offline
Guysmiley wrote:

I seem to recall a discussion about the F-22's supercruise ability. Just because the engines aren't in AB doesn't mean their fuel flow is low. At full MIL power they burn a LOT of gas, it's the price you pay for all that dry power.


Good point there, although the temperatures at the nozzle get hotter in full AB, this increases the range at which IR systems can bag you. A small temperature increase can increase emissivity by an order of magnitude.
Carbon particles in the exhaust can present a problem also concerning emissions that can be detected....

_________________
"I may not agree with what you say....but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
snypa777
PostPosted: Jan 16, 2006 - 11:15 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 26, 2005 - 03:00 AM
Posts: 1506

Status: Offline
Here is good photo, a snap shot from a Mirage 2000D PDL-CT pod. Apparently this system wasn`t designed for this kind of tracking but got this shot of French Airforce Jaguar. This was from 35 nautical mile range. In perfect weather!
The second pic` is the pod itself. The third pic shows another method of IR suppression on the YF-23, special ceramic tiles on the exhaust areas. The `23 had some kind of tile on the intake as well.



irranging7ek.png
 Description:
Jaguar in the sights....
 Filesize:  205.07 KB
 Viewed:  6095 Time(s)

irranging7ek.png



pdlct-1.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  21.69 KB
 Viewed:  6095 Time(s)

pdlct-1.jpg



02WMF-YF23-6.jpg
 Description:
YF-23 rear end!
 Filesize:  43.7 KB
 Viewed:  6095 Time(s)

02WMF-YF23-6.jpg


 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2012 F-16.net