| Author |
Message |
|
Boman
|
Posted: Mar 09, 2006 - 10:47 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jul 08, 2004
Posts: 618
Status: Offline
|
It just dawned on me how cool it would look for a Block 50/52 to carry an AGM-88 on one side and a double/triple launch rail with AGM-65's on the other
However, I've never seen this arrangement !?
Does anyone know if its done/has been done ?
I've seen the combination of single rail AGM-65's with AGM-88 on the other side and know that this works fine, but again not the other option as previously described
Thoughts anyone?
Thanks  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Oct 11, 2008 - 9:57 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Purplehaze
|
Posted: Mar 09, 2006 - 09:59 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 1198
Status: Offline
|
| During Allied Force we flew some with an 88 and one 65. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Loomis
|
Posted: Mar 13, 2006 - 06:50 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: May 31, 2005
Posts: 69
Status: Offline
|
| Mavericks are loaded on either the LAU-88 (triple rail) or the LAU-117 (single rail). The triple rail launcher can only support the lighter weight Mavericks (read: smaller warhead) whereas the single rail can carry any Maverick. The versatility of the single rail launcher is driving the LAU-88 into disfavor. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Henrik
|
Posted: Mar 13, 2006 - 07:53 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 12, 2005
Posts: 1557
Status: Offline
|
Hello Boman,
During the 1990s there were some tests with four AGM-88s loaded on the F-16 - on stations 3, 4, 6, 7 leaving no space for the wing tanks - only the center tank. I belive these plans were cancelled.
Greetings,
Henrik. |
_________________ Vipers Vorever!!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49266321@N00/
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|