F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: Heavy Bombers with Air to Air Missiles - Why Not? - F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-4490-start-0-sid-b65842374bd38fe1d7724a3afcd18f20.html
Printed on: 19 November 2008

Forum: Air Power

Heavy Bombers with Air to Air Missiles - Why Not?



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
parrothead
PostPosted: Dec 11, 2005 - 10:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 11, 2004
Posts: 3098

Status: Offline
OK, I think quite a few of us have read Dale Brown's books about the Flight of the Old Dog and the other bombers turned fighters he dreamed up (at least I think he dreamed them up Smile ). Heavy bombers can carry some serious loads - just look up the max loadouts for the Bone, Buff, and Spirit Shocked ! Lots of 500 pounders!

With today's technology, you don't need a radar onboard the launch vehicle to feed the targeting data to the missiles prior to launch as this can be obtained via datalink from an AWACS or a fighter in the area. So why not fill up the bays on a Spirit or Bone, or the wing pylons and bays on a BUFF with AMRAAMS and send 'em against the enemy force? Heck, with that type of payload you could probably fit slightly modified Standard SAMs from Navy ships onboard for some extra range to target at launch!

I have a feeling I may know some of the answers to this question such as you want the launch aircraft to be as fast and high as possible for max range to target and you might have to maneuver after launching your missiles to evade inbound enemy weapons. Even with those considerations, why not load up at least one jet in the flight for the protection of the other jets? And why not throw a few HARMs on board while you're at it?

Thanks in advance guys Very Happy !

_________________
No plane on Sunday, maybe be one come Monday...
www.parrotheadjeff.com
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Nov 19, 2008 - 3:22 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





   
 
VMF-214
PostPosted: Dec 11, 2005 - 02:53 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Nov 20, 2005
Posts: 67

Already Boeing had plans to install Amraams on the proposed re-manufactured B-1R or a furure upgraded B-1B (most avionics on the B-1R are taken from F-16bq60), also the new MMA P-8A will have 4 Amraam instaled on the wings (yes a B737 with Amraams), ant the operatore will be fully autonomus with these misiles, also there are plans to put Amraams on the MQ-9B (PredatorB), these missiles will be launceh by the opertor but targeted by AWACS, F-15s/F-22s or another jet or ground (or helo) capable to remotely guide the Amraam.

_________________
BAH BAH ...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Velvet
PostPosted: Dec 11, 2005 - 05:18 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Posts: 60
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Status: Offline
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TenguNoHi
PostPosted: Dec 11, 2005 - 08:27 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Sep 29, 2004
Posts: 922

Status: Offline
Stupid Predators -_-

-Aaron
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
parrothead
PostPosted: Dec 12, 2005 - 06:32 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 10, 2004
Posts: 3098

Status: Offline
AMRAAMs on a 737 Shocked ??? Watch out or those Southwest Airlines pilots might start thinking about that whole title of "cowboys of the sky" a bit differently Laughing !

All kidding aside, this is definitely interesting news and I think I'm in for some time doing a bit of research on it Smile . Thanks again guys!

_________________
No plane on Sunday, maybe be one come Monday...
www.parrotheadjeff.com
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Raptor_One
PostPosted: Dec 12, 2005 - 07:55 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Aug 19, 2004
Posts: 1092

Dale Brown has always been ahead of reality. Did anybody read Storming Heaven which was published in either 1993 or '94? Not exactly the 9-11 scenario, but there were indeed terrorists crashing planes into buildings/airport terminals in that book. And they did attack D.C. as well. I still shake my head in disgust when I hear people in gov't or the media say that the attacks of 9/11/2001 could never have been predicted as they were so unexpected and bla bla bla. A-A missiles on bombers for self defense? That was an easy prediction for ole' Dale.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sniper69
PostPosted: Dec 12, 2005 - 09:24 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 262
Location: New Hampshire
Status: Offline
Quote:

AMRAAMs on a 737 ??? Watch out or those Southwest Airlines pilots might start thinking about that whole title of "cowboys of the sky" a bit differently !


Yeah, they'll have to change thier slogan from "DING! You are now free to move about the country" to "BEEP! Target locked cleared to engage." Devil Hey, if they put lasers on a 747, why not missles on the smaller models? Crazy Pilot

Besides, if I were a heavy pilot, having some AMRAAMs to play with would give me a warm, fuzzy, secure feeling when flying into someplace with enemy fighter activity. In Love Makes you wonder whats next, maybe some thrust vectoring perhaps? Cool
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
VMF-214
PostPosted: Dec 12, 2005 - 12:42 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Nov 20, 2005
Posts: 67

The bad new for 737's pilots on the navy, is that they will never fire the Amraams, this will be done by the weapons officer far behind the cockpit, but is very nice the Idea to imagine to see some Su-27 (downed) markings on the 737's nose.

_________________
BAH BAH ...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
swanee
PostPosted: Dec 31, 2005 - 02:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Posts: 531

Status: Offline
well something like 80% of southwest pilots are part time F-16 pilots in the ANG, so it wouldnt be much of a change...

_________________
Life is too short for ugly sailboats, fat women and bad beer!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
snypa777
PostPosted: Jan 04, 2006 - 08:31 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 26, 2005
Posts: 1455

Status: Offline
Would love to see a 737 "notching" an SU 27`s radar! Wink

_________________
"I may not agree with what you say....but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
boff180
PostPosted: Jan 04, 2006 - 08:49 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Posts: 791

Status: Offline
Well during the falklands, we loaded Nimrods with Sidewinders for self defence Smile; a capability thats being enhanced on the MRA.4 variant.

We also used the Vulcan for SEAD using Shrikes Smile there was even a feasibility study of carrying 2 Gnat fighters under the wings of a Vulcan on docking stations during the cold war to provide air defence.

Andy
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
RyanCollins
PostPosted: Jan 05, 2006 - 07:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 07, 2004
Posts: 603

Status: Offline
A new topic: 737 w/AMRAAMs vs Su-27.. who will win?? Laughing

_________________
Pónganse de pie, Argentina avanza!
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
 
VMF-214
PostPosted: Jan 05, 2006 - 11:57 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Nov 20, 2005
Posts: 67

RyanCollins wrote:
A new topic: 737 w/AMRAAMs vs Su-27.. who will win?? Laughing


I bet for a 7-1 kill ratio or better, that's due the low acuracy of the RD-77, against the very acurate AIM-120, and 8 tons of electronics onboard the 737 (plus the AESA offensive ECM mode).

_________________
BAH BAH ...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
flames
PostPosted: May 19, 2007 - 06:21 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Posts: 120

Status: Offline
Quote:

Dale Brown has always been ahead of reality. Did anybody read Storming Heaven

That book has to be one of his best buy far!!! And I'll but 10$ on the Su-27 Cheers

_________________
Trouble in the air is very rare. It is hitting the ground that causes it.
-- Amelia Earhart
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Raptor_One
PostPosted: May 19, 2007 - 07:15 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Aug 19, 2004
Posts: 1092

flames wrote:
Quote:

Dale Brown has always been ahead of reality. Did anybody read Storming Heaven

That book has to be one of his best buy far!!! And I'll but 10$ on the Su-27 Cheers


Yes indeed. The question is, will Henri Cazaux (sp?) ever return from the dead? I'm not sure they ever got him in the end. Wink
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel