| Author |
Message |
|
parrothead
|
Posted: Dec 11, 2005 - 10:10 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 11, 2004
Posts: 3098
Status: Offline
|
OK, I think quite a few of us have read Dale Brown's books about the Flight of the Old Dog and the other bombers turned fighters he dreamed up (at least I think he dreamed them up ). Heavy bombers can carry some serious loads - just look up the max loadouts for the Bone, Buff, and Spirit ! Lots of 500 pounders!
With today's technology, you don't need a radar onboard the launch vehicle to feed the targeting data to the missiles prior to launch as this can be obtained via datalink from an AWACS or a fighter in the area. So why not fill up the bays on a Spirit or Bone, or the wing pylons and bays on a BUFF with AMRAAMS and send 'em against the enemy force? Heck, with that type of payload you could probably fit slightly modified Standard SAMs from Navy ships onboard for some extra range to target at launch!
I have a feeling I may know some of the answers to this question such as you want the launch aircraft to be as fast and high as possible for max range to target and you might have to maneuver after launching your missiles to evade inbound enemy weapons. Even with those considerations, why not load up at least one jet in the flight for the protection of the other jets? And why not throw a few HARMs on board while you're at it?
Thanks in advance guys ! |
_________________ No plane on Sunday, maybe be one come Monday...
www.parrotheadjeff.com
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Nov 19, 2008 - 3:22 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VMF-214
|
Posted: Dec 11, 2005 - 02:53 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 20, 2005
Posts: 67
|
| Already Boeing had plans to install Amraams on the proposed re-manufactured B-1R or a furure upgraded B-1B (most avionics on the B-1R are taken from F-16bq60), also the new MMA P-8A will have 4 Amraam instaled on the wings (yes a B737 with Amraams), ant the operatore will be fully autonomus with these misiles, also there are plans to put Amraams on the MQ-9B (PredatorB), these missiles will be launceh by the opertor but targeted by AWACS, F-15s/F-22s or another jet or ground (or helo) capable to remotely guide the Amraam. |
_________________ BAH BAH ...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Velvet
|
Posted: Dec 11, 2005 - 05:18 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 18, 2005
Posts: 60
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Status: Offline
|
| Be afraid. Be very afraid. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TenguNoHi
|
Posted: Dec 11, 2005 - 08:27 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Sep 29, 2004
Posts: 922
Status: Offline
|
Stupid Predators -_-
-Aaron |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
parrothead
|
Posted: Dec 12, 2005 - 06:32 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: May 10, 2004
Posts: 3098
Status: Offline
|
AMRAAMs on a 737 ??? Watch out or those Southwest Airlines pilots might start thinking about that whole title of "cowboys of the sky" a bit differently !
All kidding aside, this is definitely interesting news and I think I'm in for some time doing a bit of research on it . Thanks again guys! |
_________________ No plane on Sunday, maybe be one come Monday...
www.parrotheadjeff.com
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Raptor_One
|
Posted: Dec 12, 2005 - 07:55 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Aug 19, 2004
Posts: 1092
|
| Dale Brown has always been ahead of reality. Did anybody read Storming Heaven which was published in either 1993 or '94? Not exactly the 9-11 scenario, but there were indeed terrorists crashing planes into buildings/airport terminals in that book. And they did attack D.C. as well. I still shake my head in disgust when I hear people in gov't or the media say that the attacks of 9/11/2001 could never have been predicted as they were so unexpected and bla bla bla. A-A missiles on bombers for self defense? That was an easy prediction for ole' Dale. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sniper69
|
Posted: Dec 12, 2005 - 09:24 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Posts: 262
Location: New Hampshire
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VMF-214
|
Posted: Dec 12, 2005 - 12:42 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 20, 2005
Posts: 67
|
| The bad new for 737's pilots on the navy, is that they will never fire the Amraams, this will be done by the weapons officer far behind the cockpit, but is very nice the Idea to imagine to see some Su-27 (downed) markings on the 737's nose. |
_________________ BAH BAH ...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
swanee
|
Posted: Dec 31, 2005 - 02:10 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Posts: 531
Status: Offline
|
| well something like 80% of southwest pilots are part time F-16 pilots in the ANG, so it wouldnt be much of a change... |
_________________ Life is too short for ugly sailboats, fat women and bad beer!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
snypa777
|
Posted: Jan 04, 2006 - 08:31 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 26, 2005
Posts: 1455
Status: Offline
|
Would love to see a 737 "notching" an SU 27`s radar!  |
_________________ "I may not agree with what you say....but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
|
|
|
|
 |
|
boff180
|
Posted: Jan 04, 2006 - 08:49 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Posts: 791
Status: Offline
|
Well during the falklands, we loaded Nimrods with Sidewinders for self defence ; a capability thats being enhanced on the MRA.4 variant.
We also used the Vulcan for SEAD using Shrikes there was even a feasibility study of carrying 2 Gnat fighters under the wings of a Vulcan on docking stations during the cold war to provide air defence.
Andy |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
RyanCollins
|
Posted: Jan 05, 2006 - 07:51 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 07, 2004
Posts: 603
Status: Offline
|
A new topic: 737 w/AMRAAMs vs Su-27.. who will win??  |
_________________ Pónganse de pie, Argentina avanza!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VMF-214
|
Posted: Jan 05, 2006 - 11:57 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 20, 2005
Posts: 67
|
|
RyanCollins wrote:
A new topic: 737 w/AMRAAMs vs Su-27.. who will win??
I bet for a 7-1 kill ratio or better, that's due the low acuracy of the RD-77, against the very acurate AIM-120, and 8 tons of electronics onboard the 737 (plus the AESA offensive ECM mode). |
_________________ BAH BAH ...
|
|
|
|
 |
|
flames
|
Posted: May 19, 2007 - 06:21 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Posts: 120
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
Dale Brown has always been ahead of reality. Did anybody read Storming Heaven
That book has to be one of his best buy far!!! And I'll but 10$ on the Su-27  |
_________________ Trouble in the air is very rare. It is hitting the ground that causes it.
-- Amelia Earhart
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Raptor_One
|
Posted: May 19, 2007 - 07:15 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Aug 19, 2004
Posts: 1092
|
|
flames wrote:
Quote:
Dale Brown has always been ahead of reality. Did anybody read Storming Heaven
That book has to be one of his best buy far!!! And I'll but 10$ on the Su-27
Yes indeed. The question is, will Henri Cazaux (sp?) ever return from the dead? I'm not sure they ever got him in the end.  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|