F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: F-35's engine technology? - F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-4455-view-previous-sid-5b620acb81988ef6b1937f6847d944e0.html
Printed on: 19 November 2008

Forum: F-35 Lightning II

F-35's engine technology?



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
shocktroop
PostPosted: Oct 30, 2006 - 01:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: May 22, 2005
Posts: 170

Status: Offline
About a year ago, I watched a TV show about Soviet/Russian naval aviation.
In the part where they talked about the Yak-141, they mentioned that after the Russian government couldn't get enough funds to put the Yak into operational service, they sold the Yak-141's engine technology to the west.
A few days ago, this topic came back into my mind and I wanted to see if this really is true.

I found a few Russian video clips on the net about the Yak-141, and they mentioned that Western experts were very impressed when they saw the Yak-141 at the Farnborough airshow and that some sort of technology regarding the Yak-141 was trasnfered or sold to the west.
I also found this Russian site in English which claims this:

Quote:
The Yak-141 had its maiden flight some 25 years ahead of the timeframe set by foreign manufacturers for creation of such a plane. After the show in Farnborough, Yakovlev design bureau worked together with Lockheed on Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) programme. As a result, Lockheed’s final JSF proposal resembles... the Yak-141M.


http://www.bearcraft-online.com/museum/ ... htm?mid=89

Can anyone confirm this or are there any Western sources that confirm this?
Thanks.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Nov 19, 2008 - 3:22 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





   
 
SpeakTheTruth
PostPosted: Oct 30, 2006 - 01:09 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jul 26, 2006
Posts: 144

Status: Offline
Little bit of info on this page about it.

http://www.aiaa.org/aerospace/Article.cfm?issuetocid=47&ArchiveIssueID=9
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
shocktroop
PostPosted: Oct 30, 2006 - 04:42 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: May 22, 2005
Posts: 170

Status: Offline
Thanks.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
asiatrails
PostPosted: Jan 04, 2007 - 04:14 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Posts: 750

Status: Offline
Yes the technology for the swiveling nozzle is similar. However, the YAK-141 required full AB for a vertical take off, resulting in the Admiral Gorsky having a water suppression system installed on it's deck. It was in no way a Harrier type airframe which can operate from most hard standings and rough terrain.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
dwightlooi
PostPosted: Jan 04, 2007 - 06:08 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Aug 01, 2006
Posts: 1003

Status: Offline
The swiveling nozzle is similar in concept. But the lift system is completely different. The Yak-141 uses the main engine's thrust in the back, but uses two separate jet engines in the front. The F-35B uses a lift fan in the front which is driven by the main engine.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel