Forum: Program and politics

News: USAF F-35A JSF won't be canceled



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Scorpion1alpha
PostPosted: Dec 03, 2005 - 12:54 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Moderator
F-16.net Moderator


Joined: Oct 21, 2005 - 01:47 AM
Posts: 1375

Status: Offline
According to "Aviation Leak", somebody at the Pentagon sided with common sense and the USAF-optimized F-35A JSF won't be canceled. Probably will be cut in numbers though.

And, the F/A-22 Raptor production line will be extended through at least the year 2010.

http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/c ... F12025.xml

_________________
I'm watching...
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 21, 2013 - 10:44 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Raptorman
PostPosted: Dec 03, 2005 - 06:32 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jul 04, 2005 - 02:55 AM
Posts: 85
Location: Melborne Fl
Status: Offline
why is there a picture of a X-32 on that article just that makes me think it might be a little unreliable

_________________
3 rights make a left 2 wrights make an airplane
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
agilefalcon16
PostPosted: Dec 03, 2005 - 06:26 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Jan 26, 2005 - 08:59 PM
Posts: 397

Status: Offline
Quote:
The Air Force still plans to cut the number of Lockheed Martin-built F-35s it will buy from 1,763 to about 1,100


I see that the Air Force has decided to, yet again, cut the amount of F-35's they wanted to purchase down to only 1,100. I just don't see how they're going to replace 2,250+ F-16's, with 1,100 F-35's (and I'd imagine the number of F-35's will probably decrease again soon). Jeez, in the future, we're going to have one small AF. Sad
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Boman
PostPosted: Dec 03, 2005 - 07:46 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1106

Status: Offline
Quote:

I just don't see how they're going to replace 2,250+ F-16's, with 1,100 F-35's

The total quantity of F-16`s bought by the USAF is around 2231, but active today is less than 1500. The rest are most likely at AMARC or the scrap heap, or will be there soon due to BRAC.
Quote:

Jeez, in the future, we're going to have one small AF

Your`s not the only one I`m afraid Crying or Very sad , but the reason is that the expense of running an AF is very high and the threats not the same as they used to be thus eliminating the need for very strong AF`s.
I know someone is going to be bitching me for saying this, but its true. Shrug

_________________
Best regards
Niels

http://s587.photobucket.com/albums/ss316/NC-Boman/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Dec 05, 2005 - 06:30 AM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147

agilefalcon16 wrote:
Quote:
The Air Force still plans to cut the number of Lockheed Martin-built F-35s it will buy from 1,763 to about 1,100


I see that the Air Force has decided to, yet again, cut the amount of F-35's they wanted to purchase down to only 1,100. I just don't see how they're going to replace 2,250+ F-16's, with 1,100 F-35's (and I'd imagine the number of F-35's will probably decrease again soon). Jeez, in the future, we're going to have one small AF. Sad


Fact is we don't need that many airframes. This is the targets per sortie era not the sorties per target era. So much for JSF being low cost. Laughing

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LordOfBunnies
PostPosted: Dec 05, 2005 - 08:17 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jul 21, 2005 - 06:28 AM
Posts: 588
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Status: Offline
This is the classic spiral of death. I've heard about it, but this is it up close and personal. Quite odd really, I wonder if the government will step in like they did with the -22 and get the cost back down. Oh well, should be interesting to watch at least.

_________________
Peace through superior firepower.
Back as a Student, it's a long story.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Dec 05, 2005 - 10:37 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147

Unfortunately we probably won't cancel JSF. V-22 killed a bunch of people and is dubious all the way around, including the latest combat evaluation that was done with kid gloves, and it isn't cancelled yet. No one was fired over C-130J as far as I know. The fielding of the POS Stryker AFV and the tanker fiasco. We are doing pretty good so far. That is a solid trend. Laughing

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vinnie
PostPosted: Dec 06, 2005 - 01:03 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 06, 2004 - 03:37 AM
Posts: 436

Status: Offline
elp is right on. When you take a hard look at it a defense contractors main goal is to make the most profit that they can for it's stock holders, if their product turns out to be good that's great but if not they tend to fudge ,lie or steal. Did not LM get caught with Boeing documents concerning rocket launches at the Cape? They also got caught selling warehouses that the AF paid for to support the 22. Remember the Marines that pencil whipped the V-22 records? How about the AF officer at the appropiations hearing claiming the 22 cost could be brought down to around 90 million but upon further questions had to admit that 90 million didn't include the engines! I'm not picking on LM, they all do it. My mother-in-laws cousin works at the GAO, she has good stories at family reunions.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
swanee
PostPosted: Dec 06, 2005 - 02:15 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 25, 2005 - 11:08 PM
Posts: 531

Status: Offline
vinnie wrote:
elp is right on. When you take a hard look at it a defense contractors main goal is to make the most profit that they can for it's stock holders, if their product turns out to be good that's great but if not they tend to fudge ,lie or steal. Did not LM get caught with Boeing documents concerning rocket launches at the Cape? They also got caught selling warehouses that the AF paid for to support the 22. Remember the Marines that pencil whipped the V-22 records? How about the AF officer at the appropiations hearing claiming the 22 cost could be brought down to around 90 million but upon further questions had to admit that 90 million didn't include the engines! I'm not picking on LM, they all do it. My mother-in-laws cousin works at the GAO, she has good stories at family reunions.


This unfortunate practice isn't limited to the DoD. Pretty much every department in the government, whether it is local, state or federal fudges their numbers greatly. When was the last time that a road construction project was completed on time and under budget? It has gotten bad enough that congressmen and women expect this and inflate prices as much as 20% or more... Wow, the things you learn from Gov327...

_________________
Life is too short for ugly sailboats, fat women and bad beer!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
habu2
PostPosted: Dec 06, 2005 - 11:00 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Sep 05, 2003 - 09:36 PM
Posts: 2811

Status: Offline
vinnie wrote:
Did not LM get caught with Boeing documents concerning rocket launches at the Cape?

No, they did not. Boeing got caught with LM documents concerning the EELV program. There is much more to the story than that though.

_________________
Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Corsair1963
PostPosted: Dec 19, 2005 - 05:21 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1907

Status: Offline
I think the odds are 60/40 that the F-35A could be cancelled. Really, the cost of the Iraq War is costing the US Military Billions and its looking at "every" possibility to save money. Remember the cancelation of the F-35A doesn't mean it wouldn't get a version of the JSF. Just a landbased version of the Naval F-35C. The combined saving of the F-35B/C order by all of the US Armed Service plus the JSF Partners would be quite large! Maybe even seeing a few more F-22's ordered as a by product! Very Happy
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
elp
PostPosted: Dec 19, 2005 - 10:50 PM Reply with quote Back to top
F-16.net Editor
F-16.net Editor


Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3147

If the thing flys next year and can drop some weapons kinda OK, I promise to write a book: Why I like J$F ...And You Should Too...

I just want some cash under the table. Not greedy. A nice place in Scottsdale, enough walk around money for life. ( Hit the first tee at Greyhawk a few times a week etc. ) Laughing I know how the system works. I'm joining the I-have-a-price team. Laughing

_________________
- ELP -
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
NVGdude
PostPosted: Dec 19, 2005 - 11:03 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jan 14, 2004 - 06:01 PM
Posts: 87

Status: Offline
elp wrote:
If the thing flys next year and can drop some weapons kinda OK, I promise to write a book: Why I like J$F ...And You Should Too...

I just want some cash under the table. Not greedy. A nice place in Scottsdale, enough walk around money for life. ( Hit the first tee at Greyhawk a few times a week etc. ) Laughing I know how the system works. I'm joining the I-have-a-price team. Laughing


Scottsdale, *bleach*, now Queen Creek I could see.... Wink

-MArk
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Corsair1963
PostPosted: Dec 20, 2005 - 04:09 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1907

Status: Offline
elp wrote:
If the thing flys next year and can drop some weapons kinda OK, I promise to write a book: Why I like J$F ...And You Should Too...

I just want some cash under the table. Not greedy. A nice place in Scottsdale, enough walk around money for life. ( Hit the first tee at Greyhawk a few times a week etc. ) Laughing I know how the system works. I'm joining the I-have-a-price team. Laughing




What do we get? Confused
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic