Forum: Mishaps

Top Gun movie - Jet wash/Flat spin



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2, 3, 4  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Bwadwey
PostPosted: Jun 15, 2005 - 03:43 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jan 25, 2005 - 12:06 AM
Posts: 157

Status: Offline
In the scene when Maverick and Goose eject, what kind of problem were they in? Somethign called a jet wash I think. What does it mean and how is it created?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 24, 2013 - 1:58 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
DeepSpace
PostPosted: Jun 15, 2005 - 04:14 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Aug 14, 2003 - 07:26 PM
Posts: 1053

Status: Offline
Firstly, it's a fact that when the air enters the engine from the air intake it must be at a sub-sonic speed. Inside the air intake if the F-14 there are a few hydraulic-propelled "plates" that compress the air while the plane flies at super-sonic speed (it's deployed automatically), and therefore the air slows down before it reaches the engine. This system is equivalent to the moving intake of the F-15.

So, in that scene they fly in a sub-sonic speed, and suddenly they cross another jet's trails. That fast-moving air reaches the engines too fast (that system wasn't deployed since they flew in a subsonic speed), and the engine stalled. As a result they entered a falt spin, which is hard to recover from.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
VPRGUY
PostPosted: Jun 15, 2005 - 06:33 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Apr 24, 2005 - 07:03 PM
Posts: 853

Status: Offline
I know it was a movie but... how does an F-14 (or any twin fighter jet) get into a flat spin from losing one engine? Even if the other is in full AB, I would think the engines are close enough to the centerline that it would generate a good yaw, probably a roll as well, but a flat spin?

It is a tough maneuver to get out of; it is also a tough maneuver to get into, and even purpose-designed high end aerobatic aircraft need specific control inputs to enter a flat spin (usually, anyway). I can see a regular spin even, since twin prop aircraft are easy to spin if you lose an engine.

Pretty cool diagrams and description of the F-14 intake system, Deepspace Smile

_________________
Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
trailmix
PostPosted: Jun 16, 2005 - 03:18 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Aug 30, 2004 - 05:39 PM
Posts: 229

Status: Offline
lol... I love this stuff Smile In the conventional RAM jet the air must be a subsonic speed. NASA proved that supersonic combustion IS possible with their Mach 10+ SCRAM jet last year.

~mix

_________________
Squawk 1-2-0-0, resume own navigation~
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
shiz302
PostPosted: Jun 19, 2005 - 10:40 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 25, 2003 - 10:03 PM
Posts: 679

That spin makes about as much sense as goose hitting his head on the canopy too.

_________________
Ex 16 CC workin 'hawks.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Bwadwey
PostPosted: Jun 22, 2005 - 12:51 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Jan 25, 2005 - 12:06 AM
Posts: 157

Status: Offline
So since the Tomcat and the eagle have the things in their air intakes to change the speed of airflow going into the engine. Then how about the F-16 and F-18 , do they have these things in there intakes when they go supersonic speeds?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
MikeMan
PostPosted: Jun 22, 2005 - 07:11 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Aug 22, 2003 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 14
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
First let me say that Top Gun used to be one of my favorite movies of all time.

However that spin was one of the things that always bothered me about the movie.

The others were:

1. Final fight, how does maverick cover 180 miles to the dogfight in 60 seconds?
2. Why no radar guided missiles?
3. Why launch a single aircraft as backup?
4. Speed = life, so why slow down?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
DeepSpace
PostPosted: Jun 22, 2005 - 12:09 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Aug 14, 2003 - 07:26 PM
Posts: 1053

Status: Offline
Bwadwey wrote:
So since the Tomcat and the eagle have the things in their air intakes to change the speed of airflow going into the engine. Then how about the F-16 and F-18 , do they have these things in there intakes when they go supersonic speeds?


No, the F-16's intake doesn't have any moving parts. It slows down the air by its far installation from the aircrafts nose (about 4 meters), and separation from the body (note that there is a space between the intake and the aircraft itself).

About the intake of the F-18, I guess they used the same principle, because the F-18 came from the YF-17, which competed against the F-16 in the LWF program.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
AIr-Strike31
PostPosted: Jul 01, 2005 - 05:58 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Mar 31, 2005 - 05:26 AM
Posts: 46

Status: Offline
Wow, first of all Just Wow'
The 80’s!
WOW! Shocked

Anyways, I have a question about Hollywood and real life Air combat,
Ill keep it simple though. I know that it’s not likely but what’s with that ejection in this movie, is it possible for the canopy to poses that kind of a problem?

THNX

_________________
Striker-out!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
shiz302
PostPosted: Jul 01, 2005 - 11:28 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 25, 2003 - 10:03 PM
Posts: 679

Dunno how the tomcat works but if it's anything like the F-16 there is a lanyard connecting the canopy to the seat rockets. Directly or indirectly, and once the canopy has pulled far enough away, then the seat will eject. Kceject can prolly give you a better explanation.
Watch behind enemy lines, that shows it pretty well.

_________________
Ex 16 CC workin 'hawks.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Kosmos
PostPosted: Jul 01, 2005 - 01:30 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jan 28, 2004 - 08:01 PM
Posts: 45
Location: Denmark/Sweden
Status: Offline
Shiz302: You have to remember that Maverick say "Watch the canopy" just before they punch out... I guess Goose didn't watch the canopy Wink
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
shiz302
PostPosted: Jul 01, 2005 - 07:01 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Dec 25, 2003 - 10:03 PM
Posts: 679

Kosmos wrote:
Shiz302: You have to remember that Maverick say "Watch the canopy" just before they punch out... I guess Goose didn't watch the canopy Wink


Must have been a step in the tomcat ejection process, haha.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Raptorman
PostPosted: Jul 05, 2005 - 10:45 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jul 04, 2005 - 02:55 AM
Posts: 85
Location: Melborne Fl
Status: Offline
The Raptor canopy is heavier on one side so when the pilot punches out it flips out of the way

_________________
3 rights make a left 2 wrights make an airplane
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Infinity16
PostPosted: Jul 06, 2005 - 07:30 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Sep 13, 2003 - 05:09 AM
Posts: 100

Status: Offline
MikeMan wrote:

4. Speed = life, so why slow down?



Something similar to that move is actually taught in top gun. It’s been used once in air to air. I can’t remember the specific details but I think (THINK) that a single Phantom was engaged with a MiG-23. They were trading advantages very often until the guy in the F-4 did something similar while he was inverted. I’m sure it was not as glorious as “fly right by” but he did get kill. If anyone can give a little more info or even correct mine that would be great.

EDIT: I agree with you that Speed is VERY important and this was probably not the right time to pull that crap in Top Gun, but none the less it does exist.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Kosmos
PostPosted: Jul 06, 2005 - 09:16 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Jan 28, 2004 - 08:01 PM
Posts: 45
Location: Denmark/Sweden
Status: Offline
There is no way you can crash into your own canopy, not matter how hard you try. And even if you should make it somehow, the ACES seat is higher then my head/helmet (this goes for all seats that I have ever seen). So it would crash into (or through) the canopy, and protect my head (if needed).
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic