| Author |
Message |
|
more*cowbell
|
Posted: Oct 26, 2005 - 05:18 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Aug 04, 2005 - 02:22 PM
Posts: 5
Status: Offline
|
| Anybody know of any procedures on how to load a Python on a LAU-129? Is it even possible? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 22, 2013 - 7:33 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
DeepSpace
|
Posted: Oct 26, 2005 - 06:53 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Aug 14, 2003 - 07:26 PM
Posts: 1053
Status: Offline
|
| Yes. The Python can be loaded on every AIM-9 capable aircraft/launcher and doesn't require any special modification or procedure. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
more*cowbell
|
Posted: Oct 26, 2005 - 08:10 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Aug 04, 2005 - 02:22 PM
Posts: 5
Status: Offline
|
| Is there a reference for that somewhere? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
DeepSpace
|
Posted: Oct 26, 2005 - 08:53 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Aug 14, 2003 - 07:26 PM
Posts: 1053
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
The Python 4 is compatible with all standard AIM-9 capable launchers, and has been tested and cleared for use on the F-15, F-16, F/A-18 and F-5.
http://www.sci.fi/~fta/python4.html |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tico
|
Posted: Nov 15, 2005 - 11:30 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Nov 15, 2005 - 11:29 PM
Posts: 7
Status: Offline
|
| This is not true for Python 5. It requires a specialized launcher. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
WOLF
|
Posted: Oct 23, 2007 - 10:26 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Feb 17, 2004 - 07:58 PM
Posts: 72
Status: Offline
|
|
Tico wrote:
This is not true for Python 5. It requires a specialized launcher.
Are you sure about that?
Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
donk14N
|
Posted: Oct 23, 2007 - 10:35 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 06, 2006 - 01:42 AM
Posts: 76
Status: Offline
|
| The only difference between the Python 5 and the 4 is the seeker head. Structurally they are the same missile, so I don't see why they couldn't be fired from the same launcher. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
WOLF
|
Posted: Oct 23, 2007 - 10:53 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Feb 17, 2004 - 07:58 PM
Posts: 72
Status: Offline
|
Yeah, that's what i know also...
Regards |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
F16wedge
|
Posted: Oct 24, 2007 - 04:07 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jul 14, 2006 - 08:06 AM
Posts: 19
Status: Offline
|
| The P5 requires a LUA-129i launcher. It is a LAU-129 with changed out electronics. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ViperDude
|
Posted: Oct 24, 2007 - 04:12 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Feb 15, 2006 - 04:06 PM
Posts: 252
Status: Offline
|
Thats correct the Python 5 requires a modified LAU-129. I worked the Python program for about 5yrs.
Cheers,
ViperDude |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ACMIguy
|
Posted: Oct 24, 2007 - 04:56 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jul 11, 2007 - 06:13 PM
Posts: 667
Status: Offline
|
|
donk14N wrote:
The only difference between the Python 5 and the 4 is the seeker head. Structurally they are the same missile, so I don't see why they couldn't be fired from the same launcher.
Sorta kinda the same, did you notice the Python 5 does not have an argon bottle like the 4 series? It also has BVR capabilities.
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/ ... thon5.html
Also the launchers on the F-15 are not the LAU 128. The use a modified pylon adapter with a LAU 7 type launcher.
http://www.ordnance.org/lau7a.htm
The F-16 with Python 4 or 5 seem to use the 16S210 launcher but I did see the F-18 with the LAU 127.
It's not so much the launcher it's whats inside them and how they interface.
I learned this first hand while working on some proto-type stuff as a sub contractor for Boeing.
The IAF was there with their Python and launchers testing along with us.
They have a very unique launcher test set. Some of you know about the 50/60 or beer can tester we use on the F-16. They use a square box with a light. Very quick and easy to use.
I will say this about them, you will never get any information out of those guys on anything. So what you see on the web, you can bet is already obsolete. |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
46.1 KB |
| Viewed: |
5519 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
205.43 KB |
| Viewed: |
5519 Time(s) |

|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
donk14N
|
Posted: Oct 24, 2007 - 05:15 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 06, 2006 - 01:42 AM
Posts: 76
Status: Offline
|
| ACMIguy, I knew it was a more capable missile (with limited BVR capabilities). But that is all due to the seeker is it not? Aerodynamically/Structurally they are the same, right? I have seen a Python 4 before in person, but never a 5. From all I have read and heard they decided to use the same body 'cause: A) it is still an unrivaled design in the AAM realm (if it is not broke, don't fix it type of thing), and B) to cut R&D cost. As for the LAU-129i, I can only assume the extra electronics are for the enhanced seeker. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ACMIguy
|
Posted: Oct 24, 2007 - 05:29 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jul 11, 2007 - 06:13 PM
Posts: 667
Status: Offline
|
donk14N
Yes you are right according to all the published stuff on the 5. As far as the launcher goes it has a modified interface inside.
Have you noticed not a lot of talk about data link, or after launch update from these guys? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
donk14N
|
Posted: Oct 24, 2007 - 05:48 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 06, 2006 - 01:42 AM
Posts: 76
Status: Offline
|
| I have noticed they don't talk about any of their stuff. I have only met a handful of IAF types (mostly intel officers but a few pilots) and they don't talk about any of their systems outside on generalities. They are very good at protecting their secrets. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ThomasDWeiss
|
Posted: Oct 24, 2007 - 07:21 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Apr 21, 2007 - 03:33 PM
Posts: 16
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|