| Author |
Message |
|
Bwadwey
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2005 - 03:43 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Jan 25, 2005 - 12:06 AM
Posts: 157
Status: Offline
|
| In the scene when Maverick and Goose eject, what kind of problem were they in? Somethign called a jet wash I think. What does it mean and how is it created? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 26, 2013 - 4:01 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
DeepSpace
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2005 - 04:14 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Aug 14, 2003 - 07:26 PM
Posts: 1053
Status: Offline
|
Firstly, it's a fact that when the air enters the engine from the air intake it must be at a sub-sonic speed. Inside the air intake if the F-14 there are a few hydraulic-propelled "plates" that compress the air while the plane flies at super-sonic speed (it's deployed automatically), and therefore the air slows down before it reaches the engine. This system is equivalent to the moving intake of the F-15.
So, in that scene they fly in a sub-sonic speed, and suddenly they cross another jet's trails. That fast-moving air reaches the engines too fast (that system wasn't deployed since they flew in a subsonic speed), and the engine stalled. As a result they entered a falt spin, which is hard to recover from. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VPRGUY
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2005 - 06:33 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Apr 24, 2005 - 07:03 PM
Posts: 853
Status: Offline
|
I know it was a movie but... how does an F-14 (or any twin fighter jet) get into a flat spin from losing one engine? Even if the other is in full AB, I would think the engines are close enough to the centerline that it would generate a good yaw, probably a roll as well, but a flat spin?
It is a tough maneuver to get out of; it is also a tough maneuver to get into, and even purpose-designed high end aerobatic aircraft need specific control inputs to enter a flat spin (usually, anyway). I can see a regular spin even, since twin prop aircraft are easy to spin if you lose an engine.
Pretty cool diagrams and description of the F-14 intake system, Deepspace  |
_________________ Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
trailmix
|
Posted: Jun 16, 2005 - 03:18 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Aug 30, 2004 - 05:39 PM
Posts: 229
Status: Offline
|
lol... I love this stuff In the conventional RAM jet the air must be a subsonic speed. NASA proved that supersonic combustion IS possible with their Mach 10+ SCRAM jet last year.
~mix |
_________________ Squawk 1-2-0-0, resume own navigation~
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shiz302
|
Posted: Jun 19, 2005 - 10:40 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 25, 2003 - 10:03 PM
Posts: 679
|
| That spin makes about as much sense as goose hitting his head on the canopy too. |
_________________ Ex 16 CC workin 'hawks.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Bwadwey
|
Posted: Jun 22, 2005 - 12:51 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Jan 25, 2005 - 12:06 AM
Posts: 157
Status: Offline
|
| So since the Tomcat and the eagle have the things in their air intakes to change the speed of airflow going into the engine. Then how about the F-16 and F-18 , do they have these things in there intakes when they go supersonic speeds? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
MikeMan
|
Posted: Jun 22, 2005 - 07:11 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Aug 22, 2003 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 14
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
|
First let me say that Top Gun used to be one of my favorite movies of all time.
However that spin was one of the things that always bothered me about the movie.
The others were:
1. Final fight, how does maverick cover 180 miles to the dogfight in 60 seconds?
2. Why no radar guided missiles?
3. Why launch a single aircraft as backup?
4. Speed = life, so why slow down? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
DeepSpace
|
Posted: Jun 22, 2005 - 12:09 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Aug 14, 2003 - 07:26 PM
Posts: 1053
Status: Offline
|
|
Bwadwey wrote:
So since the Tomcat and the eagle have the things in their air intakes to change the speed of airflow going into the engine. Then how about the F-16 and F-18 , do they have these things in there intakes when they go supersonic speeds?
No, the F-16's intake doesn't have any moving parts. It slows down the air by its far installation from the aircrafts nose (about 4 meters), and separation from the body (note that there is a space between the intake and the aircraft itself).
About the intake of the F-18, I guess they used the same principle, because the F-18 came from the YF-17, which competed against the F-16 in the LWF program. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
AIr-Strike31
|
Posted: Jul 01, 2005 - 05:58 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Mar 31, 2005 - 05:26 AM
Posts: 46
Status: Offline
|
Wow, first of all Just Wow'
The 80’s!
WOW!
Anyways, I have a question about Hollywood and real life Air combat,
Ill keep it simple though. I know that it’s not likely but what’s with that ejection in this movie, is it possible for the canopy to poses that kind of a problem?
THNX |
_________________ Striker-out!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shiz302
|
Posted: Jul 01, 2005 - 11:28 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 25, 2003 - 10:03 PM
Posts: 679
|
Dunno how the tomcat works but if it's anything like the F-16 there is a lanyard connecting the canopy to the seat rockets. Directly or indirectly, and once the canopy has pulled far enough away, then the seat will eject. Kceject can prolly give you a better explanation.
Watch behind enemy lines, that shows it pretty well. |
_________________ Ex 16 CC workin 'hawks.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kosmos
|
Posted: Jul 01, 2005 - 01:30 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 28, 2004 - 08:01 PM
Posts: 45
Location: Denmark/Sweden
Status: Offline
|
Shiz302: You have to remember that Maverick say "Watch the canopy" just before they punch out... I guess Goose didn't watch the canopy  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shiz302
|
Posted: Jul 01, 2005 - 07:01 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 25, 2003 - 10:03 PM
Posts: 679
|
|
Kosmos wrote:
Shiz302: You have to remember that Maverick say "Watch the canopy" just before they punch out... I guess Goose didn't watch the canopy
Must have been a step in the tomcat ejection process, haha. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Raptorman
|
Posted: Jul 05, 2005 - 10:45 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 04, 2005 - 02:55 AM
Posts: 85
Location: Melborne Fl
Status: Offline
|
| The Raptor canopy is heavier on one side so when the pilot punches out it flips out of the way |
_________________ 3 rights make a left 2 wrights make an airplane
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Infinity16
|
Posted: Jul 06, 2005 - 07:30 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Sep 13, 2003 - 05:09 AM
Posts: 100
Status: Offline
|
|
MikeMan wrote:
4. Speed = life, so why slow down?
Something similar to that move is actually taught in top gun. It’s been used once in air to air. I can’t remember the specific details but I think (THINK) that a single Phantom was engaged with a MiG-23. They were trading advantages very often until the guy in the F-4 did something similar while he was inverted. I’m sure it was not as glorious as “fly right by” but he did get kill. If anyone can give a little more info or even correct mine that would be great.
EDIT: I agree with you that Speed is VERY important and this was probably not the right time to pull that crap in Top Gun, but none the less it does exist. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Kosmos
|
Posted: Jul 06, 2005 - 09:16 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 28, 2004 - 08:01 PM
Posts: 45
Location: Denmark/Sweden
Status: Offline
|
| There is no way you can crash into your own canopy, not matter how hard you try. And even if you should make it somehow, the ACES seat is higher then my head/helmet (this goes for all seats that I have ever seen). So it would crash into (or through) the canopy, and protect my head (if needed). |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|