| Author |
Message |
|
flighthawk128
|
 Posted: May 04, 2012 - 06:08 PM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Dec 24, 2011 - 11:25 PM
Posts: 49
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 19, 2013 - 11:32 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
count_to_10
|
|
Posted: May 04, 2012 - 11:58 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1316
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
archeman
|
|
Posted: May 19, 2012 - 06:19 PM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Dec 28, 2011 - 05:37 AM
Posts: 314
Location: CA
Status: Offline
|
count10,
Well I guess that their investment is done then eh? Looks like Verticopter did all the hard design work for them!
The transition from toy to operational two seat weapon system to counter the F-35 could be a little steep methinks! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That_Engine_Guy
|
|
Posted: May 20, 2012 - 05:57 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2198
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
|
Looks like a toy to me; that prop-fan-lifting device doesn't look like it would lift the aircraft empty!?! What about the weight of fuel and weapons?
 TEG |
_________________
[Airplanes are] near perfect, all they lack is the ability to forgive.
— Richard Collins
|
|
|
|
|
|
SpudmanWP
|
|
Posted: May 20, 2012 - 06:42 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K
Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 4266
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
The original article:
Quote:
It's a stealth heavy attack helicopter. US aviation experts say that it is designed to counter the F-35 Lightning II.
The aircraft seems to be naval-oriented. Internal weapons bays are included.
Here is what the US experts have to say:
"One aircraft concept that caught the attention of reporters was a vertical takeoff and landing aircraft -- China's answer to the United States' developmental F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. A model of the aircraft, which was on display at the show, appears to incorporate some aspects of stealth technology."
I'd like to know who this "expert" was and why he thinks a chopper has any chance in hell of being the "answer" to the F-35. |
_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st503rdsgt
|
|
Posted: May 20, 2012 - 07:57 AM
|
|
|
Banned
Joined: Jan 23, 2011 - 01:23 AM
Posts: 1549
Status: Offline
|
| It's a Pakistani sight, obviously eager for anything to answer the the F-35. |
_________________
The sky is blue because God loves the Infantry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
count_to_10
|
|
Posted: May 20, 2012 - 03:36 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1316
Status: Offline
|
|
That_Engine_Guy wrote:
Looks like a toy to me; that prop-fan-lifting device doesn't look like it would lift the aircraft empty!?! What about the weight of fuel and weapons?
TEG
I think the Verticopter designs take fuel into account, but only ever intended it as a light passenger aircraft. I'm not sure if it can hover out of ground effect or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
count_to_10
|
|
Posted: May 20, 2012 - 03:40 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1316
Status: Offline
|
|
archeman wrote:
count10,
Well I guess that their investment is done then eh? Looks like Verticopter did all the hard design work for them!
The transition from toy to operational two seat weapon system to counter the F-35 could be a little steep methinks!
Oh, it gets worse: this is just a concept in a simulation, and none have actually been built. The gear box, which is only a cartoon at this point, makes the F-35's fan look simple. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tacf-x
|
|
Posted: May 21, 2012 - 03:22 AM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Sep 17, 2011 - 03:25 AM
Posts: 431
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Status: Offline
|
|
That_Engine_Guy wrote:
Looks like a toy to me; that prop-fan-lifting device doesn't look like it would lift the aircraft empty!?! What about the weight of fuel and weapons?
TEG
^^^This.
In all seriousness I'm not worried. It's just another piece of trash concept. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
