F-16 Reference
5th Gen Fighters
|
| Author |
Message |
|
singularity
|
Posted: Mar 10, 2009 - 01:19 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Dec 18, 2008 - 01:06 PM
Posts: 94
Status: Offline
|
|
sprstdlyscottsmn wrote:
How do you define Stealth A/C? You seem to refer to F-117, B-2, F-22, F-35. SR-71 was built with LO(at the time) and the B-1B has a fraction of the RCS something its size should have. Makes me think, if the B-70 and B-1A were nixed due to SAM advances, why not put a bomb bay in the YF-12(?). who cares if you get shot at when your that high/fast.
Oh yes I forgot, I was thinking pure stealth A/C as known to the general public. so by that measure 6 stealth A/C, proves my point even more. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 26, 2012 - 10:03 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
Posted: Mar 10, 2009 - 04:07 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Mar 10, 2006 - 01:24 AM
Posts: 1111
Status: Offline
|
| Don't get me wrong, I am happy for Russia to have produced LO prototypes, it shows they are still as advanced as many western nations even if they cant fund the production. All they need is money. |
_________________ James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Corsair1963
|
Posted: Mar 10, 2009 - 05:16 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1831
Status: Offline
|
|
sprstdlyscottsmn wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I am happy for Russia to have produced LO prototypes, it shows they are still as advanced as many western nations even if they cant fund the production. All they need is money.
Money would have helped a decade ago.......
It can't provide them with years of lost research..........  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Scorpion1alpha
|
Posted: Mar 12, 2009 - 09:04 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Oct 21, 2005 - 01:47 AM
Posts: 1320
Status: Offline
|
|
johnc wrote:
pak-fa won't be as good as russia says it will be
There is a 99% probability that will be true. If anything (assuming the PAK-FA or T-50 or whatever it's called is being developed and depending where in it's development stage it's at) they're no doubt experiencing first hand how difficult it is to develop a true 5th Gen fighter like the F-22 or F-35.
My personal opinion is, like several Russian fighters (if it ever materializes), will have a capability or two that will be very impressive.
However, developing a fighter integrating the 4 pillar of capabilities (stealth, supercruise speed, advanced integrated avionics/sensors, and super maneuverability) isn't easy huh Russia...or India...or Japan... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Corsair1963
|
Posted: Mar 12, 2009 - 08:48 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1831
Status: Offline
|
|
Scorpion1alpha wrote:
johnc wrote:
pak-fa won't be as good as russia says it will be
There is a 99% probability that will be true. If anything (assuming the PAK-FA or T-50 or whatever it's called is being developed and depending where in it's development stage it's at) they're no doubt experiencing first hand how difficult it is to develop a true 5th Gen fighter like the F-22 or F-35.
My personal opinion is, like several Russian fighters (if it ever materializes), will have a capability or two that will be very impressive.
However, developing a fighter integrating the 4 pillar of capabilities (stealth, supercruise speed, advanced integrated avionics/sensors, and super maneuverability) isn't easy huh Russia...or India...or Japan...
Good News for the F-35.......  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
countryman
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2009 - 10:42 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Apr 06, 2009 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 2
Status: Offline
|
I read today that Defense Secretary, Robert Gates, will be ending production of the F-22. Click on the link:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... gD97D5UDO1
If memory serves me, I thought the F-22 was the best of the best. I read that although the plane was heavy, it is still very capable and perhaps untouchable. The Clinton admin cut the budget unfairly and I felt left us vulnerable on many accounts. Cost overruns in Washington happens all the time, but why would Gates want to cancel this incredible plane knowing it could prove invaluable should Russia get its newer planes out there?
Is the F-35 the next gen aircraft to the F-22 and is the F-35 a better aircraft? Why are we giving all these Nato allies, some of whom say unkind things about our nation from time to time, our F-35? With our sensitive technology constantly being breached by the Russians or the Chinese, should we feel comfortable even selling our planes to another nation when the threat of compromising its technology is real? Could we let our allies have our older, conventional planes which we could provide maintenance for? How far along are the Russians with their aircraft?
Since 911, we've known that we have to keep our defense strong and provide funding despite the darkness of recession and especially when the proliferation of terrorism around the globe is peaking. The Chinese have made no attempt to conceal their zeal to overpower us at sea as their recent pacific stunt demonstrates. Should we be worried about them in the air? It seems like just when we seem to be on top of the world in military tech, the budget won't allow the US to stay ahead. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Corsair1963
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2009 - 11:22 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1831
Status: Offline
|
|
countryman wrote:
I read today that Defense Secretary, Robert Gates, will be ending production of the F-22. Click on the link:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... gD97D5UDO1
If memory serves me, I thought the F-22 was the best of the best. I read that although the plane was heavy, it is still very capable and perhaps untouchable. The Clinton admin cut the budget unfairly and I felt left us vulnerable on many accounts. Cost overruns in Washington happens all the time, but why would Gates want to cancel this incredible plane knowing it could prove invaluable should Russia get its newer planes out there?
Is the F-35 the next gen aircraft to the F-22 and is the F-35 a better aircraft? Why are we giving all these Nato allies, some of whom say unkind things about our nation from time to time, our F-35? With our sensitive technology constantly being breached by the Russians or the Chinese, should we feel comfortable even selling our planes to another nation when the threat of compromising its technology is real? Could we let our allies have our older, conventional planes which we could provide maintenance for? How far along are the Russians with their aircraft?
Since 911, we've known that we have to keep our defense strong and provide funding despite the darkness of recession and especially when the proliferation of terrorism around the globe is peaking. The Chinese have made no attempt to conceal their zeal to overpower us at sea as their recent pacific stunt demonstrates. Should we be worried about them in the air? It seems like just when we seem to be on top of the world in military tech, the budget won't allow the US to stay ahead.
We will sell all those allies F-35's. Because they always fight along side us and we can't win the battle without them.
Regardless, our defense will be well taken care of............
THIS IS GOOD NEWS  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Beazz
|
Posted: Apr 07, 2009 - 12:38 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 15, 2007 - 08:19 PM
Posts: 460
Status: Offline
|
[quote="countryman"]I read today that Defense Secretary, Robert Gates, will be ending production of the F-22. Click on the link:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... gD97D5UDO1
If memory serves me, I thought the F-22 was the best of the best. I read that although the plane was heavy, it is still very capable and perhaps untouchable. The Clinton admin cut the budget unfairly and I felt left us vulnerable on many accounts. Cost overruns in Washington happens all the time, but why would Gates want to cancel this incredible plane knowing it could prove invaluable should Russia get its newer planes out there?
Hadn't you heard? The Russians and Chinese have frozen all future tech developments and all future US conflicts will be against jihadis wearing flip flops driving 20 year old pick up trucks. We may even trade in our Navy and Air Force completely for a few more Army divisions armed with brand spanking new M16's and cool new combat boots and of course, nice new 4x4 pick up trucks to defeat the guys in the old pick up trucks. And of course we are gonna get rid of all those nasty nukes as well. No need to worry about China and Russia with it's thousands of nukes. They told us if we ditch ours, they will to. Gonna be such a nice world where we all *just get along*  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Apr 07, 2009 - 11:45 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003 - 09:08 PM
Posts: 3133
|
Expect Chicom knock-offs of the F-35 in a few years.  |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shep1978
|
Posted: Apr 07, 2009 - 12:09 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 04, 2009 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 1395
Location: UK
Status: Offline
|
|
elp wrote:
Expect Chicom knock-offs of the F-35 in a few years.
I'd expect an F-22 knockoff long before an F-35 clone from the Chinese. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Corsair1963
|
Posted: Apr 07, 2009 - 07:14 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1831
Status: Offline
|
|
shep1978 wrote:
elp wrote:
Expect Chicom knock-offs of the F-35 in a few years.
I'd expect an F-22 knockoff long before an F-35 clone from the Chinese.
....................and what would power it?  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
countryman
|
Posted: Apr 07, 2009 - 11:27 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Apr 06, 2009 - 10:15 PM
Posts: 2
Status: Offline
|
Here is the latest from Redstate regarding defense cuts. I hope this begets good news:
Obama Administration defense cuts
He's cutting technologies that will keep us competitive against growing threats from China and Russia
Defense Secretary Robert Gates revealed the Obama Administration's restructuring of the Pentagon's top weapons priorities.
There was a lot of information thrown out in the Gates press briefing, but the biggest talking points are likely to be the cuts:
Stop the growth of Army Brigade Combat Teams (BCT) at 45 versus 48
Retire 250 of the oldest Air Force tactical fighter aircraft in FY10.
End production of the F-22 fighter at 187.
Not pursue a development program for a follow-on Air Force bomber until we have a better understanding of the need, the requirement, and the technology.
Reduce the Navy's carrier force to 10 carriers after 2040.
Delay the CG-X next generation cruiser program.
Delay amphibious ship and sea-basing programs.
End the DDG-1000 destroyer program with the third ship.
"Complete" production of the C-17 airlifter program this fiscal year with the 205 already in the force and currently in production.
Terminate the VH-71 presidential helicopter program.
Terminate the Air Force Combat Search and Rescue X (CSAR-X) helicopter program.
Terminate the $26 billion Transformational Satellite (TSAT) program.
Cancel the planned increase the number of current ground-based interceptors in Alaska.
Cancel the second airborne laser (ABL) prototype aircraft.
Terminate the Multiple Kill Vehicle (MKV) program.
Cancel the vehicle component of the Army's Future Combat Systems (FCS) program.
Reduce the number of support service contractors from our current 39% to 26% and replace them with as many as 30,000 full-time government employees. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
skyhigh
|
Posted: Apr 08, 2009 - 01:17 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Feb 27, 2009 - 11:01 AM
Posts: 467
Status: Offline
|
|
countryman wrote:
I read today that Defense Secretary, Robert Gates, will be ending production of the F-22. Click on the link:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... gD97D5UDO1
If memory serves me, I thought the F-22 was the best of the best. I read that although the plane was heavy, it is still very capable and perhaps untouchable. The Clinton admin cut the budget unfairly and I felt left us vulnerable on many accounts. Cost overruns in Washington happens all the time, but why would Gates want to cancel this incredible plane knowing it could prove invaluable should Russia get its newer planes out there?
Hadn't you heard? The Russians and Chinese have frozen all future tech developments and all future US conflicts will be against jihadis wearing flip flops driving 20 year old pick up trucks. We may even trade in our Navy and Air Force completely for a few more Army divisions armed with brand spanking new M16's and cool new combat boots and of course, nice new 4x4 pick up trucks to defeat the guys in the old pick up trucks. And of course we are gonna get rid of all those nasty nukes as well. No need to worry about China and Russia with it's thousands of nukes. They told us if we ditch ours, they will to.  Gonna be such a nice world where we all *just get along*
Wrong!
The Russkies and Chicoms will be the most formidable duo ever to fight the United States.
The Navy, Marines and Air Force should be upped to counter these future threats and maintain its conventional warfighting capability.
Countryman, you are actually sapping the conventional warfighting capability of the United States military. The U.S. Army is not the ARVN (Army of the Republic of Vietnam), which as a COIN army, defeated by conventional means by the PAVN (People's Army of Vietnam) in the Vietnam War.
Conventional warfare will be here to stay.
We wouldn't trust the Russkies and Chicoms, because they are NO good friends of us.
One-sided nuclear disarmament never ever works. The Russkies have never disarmed, just simply placed old warheads on spanking new high-tech high-accuracy missile delivery systems while the Chicoms are about to deploy their latest Dongfeng-41 (DF-41) road-mobile ICBMs with stolen U.S. technology (thanks to Bill Klintoon). Our enemies never play by our rules, because they want results. Period.
The unconventional war in Iraq and Afghanistan was made to sap our conventional warfighting capability to make it easier for the Russkies and Chicoms to defeat us. We can't allow that.
Manned fighters like the F-22 Raptor (my favorite fighter BTW) will be the valuable air dominance asset in a high-tech high-intensity conflict with Russia and the PRC. It was not specifically made for an unconventional low-intensity conflict with the jihadists.
I'd prefer the Raptor over the Lightning II, primarity because of its all-aspect stealth (your radar set can't see me but mine can see you!) , supermaneuverability (I can do those crazy aerobatic moves in the sky), supercruise (nah nah nah nah nah nah, you can't catch me!) , sufficient warload (enough ordnance to "make my day") .
Those double digits SAMs and Sukhois are my adversaries but not my nemeses.
My real nemeses would be my 5th Gen foes like the PAK FA and J-XX, looming over the horizon.
F-22 Raptor = World's potentially largest distributor of Sukhoi parts! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SpudmanWP
|
Posted: Apr 08, 2009 - 01:54 AM
|
|
|
Elite 3K

Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 3321
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
|
skyhigh wrote:
F-22 Raptor = World's potentially largest distributor of Sukhoi parts!
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
shep1978
|
Posted: Apr 08, 2009 - 07:58 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 04, 2009 - 05:00 PM
Posts: 1395
Location: UK
Status: Offline
|
|
skyhigh wrote:
Wrong!
The Russkies and Chicoms will be the most formidable duo ever to fight the United States.
F-22 Raptor = World's potentially largest distributor of Sukhoi parts!
I think you missed countrymans sarcasm...  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|