Forum: Rotary Wing Aircraft

How good is the Apache really?



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
KarimAbdoun
PostPosted: Apr 18, 2005 - 12:04 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 30, 2004 - 07:47 PM
Posts: 509

Status: Offline
How good is the Apache really? I heard that it had many doubts after Kosovo but it reaffirmed that it is still the best in Iraq and Afganistan.



232.JPG
 Description:
AH-64A, but not sure if EAF, found in Egyptian site
 Filesize:  15.15 KB
 Viewed:  14635 Time(s)

232.JPG



_________________
The fighter is not what counts, it's the one who's flying it that matters!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 23, 2013 - 1:36 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Taco44
PostPosted: Apr 18, 2005 - 06:03 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 14, 2005 - 03:00 AM
Posts: 413

Status: Offline
The Apache is just like any other helicopter. It is awesome and second to none when it is flying at 100%. However, the Apache never seems to be @ 100%. Much to say for the USAF MH-53 J/M Paves. For heavy strikes, the Apache is still tops. For tactical missions, I'd prefer the smaller AH-1Z Super Cobra.

_________________
F-16C/D Block 30/40 NMANG
"Women and airplanes; is there anything else?"
-J. Paul Riddle, 1986
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
KarimAbdoun
PostPosted: Apr 18, 2005 - 09:54 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Jan 30, 2004 - 07:47 PM
Posts: 509

Status: Offline
But how good is the Apache really? What makes it the best aside from having the Longbow system and hellfire missiles?

_________________
The fighter is not what counts, it's the one who's flying it that matters!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Taco44
PostPosted: Apr 18, 2005 - 11:26 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 14, 2005 - 03:00 AM
Posts: 413

Status: Offline
The Apache is a extremely manueverable helicopter being one of the few that can carry the amount of firepower it does and still do barrel rolls and loops. The Apache is pretty fast with a top speed somewhere over 150kts with a full load. The Apaches have a swept back rotor tip like the Blackhawks which allows for greater manueverability and dramatically reduces it's noise. For the attack mission it does very well. One shortfall of the Apache is it's INS. There is no GPS guidance (at least in earlier models). Considering the Hellfire needs such coordinates to be accurate, this is a bad thing. During the first Gulf War, two-ships of MH-53J Pavelows had to lead the Apaches to the radar sites and let them know where they were so they could program their missiles. Overall, they are very maintenance friendly as is the Blackhawk. I'm sure your new Apaches have many upgrades that I don't know about. Hope this helps.

_________________
F-16C/D Block 30/40 NMANG
"Women and airplanes; is there anything else?"
-J. Paul Riddle, 1986
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Guysmiley
PostPosted: Jun 02, 2005 - 09:22 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496

Hellfires don't need GPS-precise position information to be accurate. They are laser guided and home to a laser spot. They can be locked on before or after launch, but don't care where they are, except in relation to the launching Apache. So if the Apache doesn't know exactly where it is, the missile could care less, because the missile knows where it was when it was launched, and as long as it sees a laser spot its happy.

The Longbow Hellfire is guided by a MMW radar, and again, could care less where it is in a larger sense, all it cares about is where the target is in relation to it.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
kilo111
PostPosted: Jun 02, 2005 - 10:02 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 30, 2005 - 05:16 PM
Posts: 36

Status: Offline
The Apache is considered the best attack helicopter in the world. The Apache has a modern electronic systems, like the TADS and the PNVS, with a FLIR and a laser pod to guide the Hellfire misiles. The Hellfire misiles are the best air to ground helicopter misiles, and can destroy everytank and vehicle.

The new AH-64D Apache longbow has a longbow radar taht can see 12 enemy objetives, and clasificate they in 6 kinds of vehicles (tanks, AAA, SAM, etc...). Also this radar can guide the Hellfire, so then this misile are now fire & forget.

However, the Aapche is consider little maneuverable, if we compare this helicopter with the european Tiger or the Cobra.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Guysmiley
PostPosted: Jun 02, 2005 - 10:24 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496

Right, the Apache is less agile than a Cobra or Tiger, no question. But neither of those can tote around 16 Hellfires either. They were designed with different objectives in mind.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Pumpkin
PostPosted: Jun 02, 2005 - 11:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 07, 2003 - 09:12 PM
Posts: 901

Guysmiley wrote:
Right, the Apache is less agile than a Cobra or Tiger, no question. But neither of those can tote around 16 Hellfires either. They were designed with different objectives in mind.


Guysmiley, I believe AH-1Z is 16-Hellfires capable.

cheers,

_________________
Desmond
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Guysmiley
PostPosted: Jun 03, 2005 - 06:47 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: May 26, 2005 - 08:39 PM
Posts: 1496

Wow, you're right. Those are some seriously beefed up stub wings! But I bet with 16 Hellfires hanging off of it its about as agile as an Apache. Smile
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
kilo111
PostPosted: Jun 03, 2005 - 10:22 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: May 30, 2005 - 05:16 PM
Posts: 36

Status: Offline
The AH-1Z can carry 16 hellfire misiles and 2 sidewinders. Poke
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
darkvarkguy
PostPosted: May 14, 2009 - 02:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 05, 2009 - 06:01 AM
Posts: 366
Location: Raleigh, NC
Status: Offline
I talked with an Apache driver at an airshow recentley who said he would give his left you-know-what to be driving a Cobra Zulu.

_________________
FB-111A Pease AFB 82-87
A-10A Suwon AB ROK 87-88
FB-111A/F-111G Pease AFB 88-90
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
skyhigh
PostPosted: May 16, 2009 - 07:01 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 27, 2009 - 11:01 AM
Posts: 467

Status: Offline
ptplauthor wrote:
Of all the tankbusters, I think I'd rather have some Frogfoots in my Air Force.


Why the Su-25 Frogfoot?

Oh, its R-195 turbojets are multi-fuel!

Why not try the Mi-28N Havoc?



mil-mi-28-3.jpg
 Description:
Mi-28N Havoc
 Filesize:  71.29 KB
 Viewed:  13167 Time(s)

mil-mi-28-3.jpg


 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ptplauthor
PostPosted: May 16, 2009 - 06:13 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 02, 2008 - 12:09 AM
Posts: 732
Location: Titletown, USA
Status: Offline
From what I've been told, the Frogfoot's capable of supersonic speeds. It's got a flush in survivability--the Havoc's only got a three-of-a-kind.

The Havoc is a Helicopter, and in CAS, as in many a mission involving airplanes, speed is life. Stopping on a dime just makes you that much MORE vulnerable to ground fire.

The ONLY chopper I'd wanna fly in combat would be the HIND--only because it thinks its a plane--fast speed and it can actually drop bombs--FTW.

_________________
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
skyhigh
PostPosted: May 17, 2009 - 06:37 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Feb 27, 2009 - 11:01 AM
Posts: 467

Status: Offline
ptplauthor wrote:
Stopping on a dime just makes you that much MORE vulnerable to ground fire.


From RPGs and MANPADs, yes, but small arms fire is nothing.

The Havoc is a Russian Apache.

In several years time, the Indians will have their indigenous attack helo, and it's gonna be better than the Apache Longbow but close to the Comanche.

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-12311.html
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
ptplauthor
PostPosted: May 17, 2009 - 06:40 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Nov 02, 2008 - 12:09 AM
Posts: 732
Location: Titletown, USA
Status: Offline
Quote:

From RPGs and MANPADs, yes, but small arms fire is nothing.


YGBSM. <<<can we get an emoticon for this?

Please kindly explain how a helicopter that can survive a rocket-propelled anti-tank grenade can be taken down by 7.62 ammunition?????

Quote:

The Havoc is a Russian Apache.


I mean this in the kindest way possible.....NO SH!T????? I never would have guessed that.

Quote:

In several years time, the Indians will have their indigenous attack helo, and it's gonna be better than the Apache Longbow but close to the Comanche.


That's right---in SEVERAL years, and it's only a "Light" helicopter. It still doesn't matter what YOUR opinion is, find me something from Jane's, GS, or FAS to hang my hat on, and I MIGHT believe you.


On a side note--does anyone else think the Havoc looks like Goofy or Wile E. Coyote from an angle?? Was "Hound" already taken?

_________________
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic