Forum: General F-35 Forum

DARPA tests breakthrough camera tech [for F-35 one day?]



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
spazsinbad
PostPosted: Aug 23, 2012 - 11:55 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7831
Location: OZ
When will this tech reach the F-35? Shirley Soon. Very Happy

DARPA tests breakthrough camera tech 23 August 2012

http://defensetech.org/2012/08/23/darpa ... mera-tech/

"The scientists at Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency want to build high powered scopes and cameras for soldiers and Marines up to 2,000 times more powerful than current imaging capabilities....

...Run under the Advanced Wide Field of View Architectures for Image Reconstruction and Exploitation (AWARE) program with Duke University, the recent test used a 1-gigapixel camera made up of 100 micro-cameras.

DARPA leaders want to eventually build a 50-gigapixel camera that would usher in the imaging capabilities that are 2,000 times more powerful than today’s cameras. The next step is to build a 10-gigapixel camera....

....Scientists and engineers understand the camera is no good to soldiers on the ground if it can’t work at night or in bad weather. These super cameras are being built for both.

DARPA officials have said they have seen major breakthroughs with their High Operating Temperature Mid-Wave Infrared (HOT MWIR), which will allow engineers to build more powerful hand held thermal imagers and long-range thermal scopes. The HOT MWIR developments also fall under AWARE...."

http://images.defensetech.org/wp-conten ... 90x495.png

BEST read entire article at URL above - if youse can read this. Rolling Eyes



AWARE-490x495.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  38.33 KB
 Viewed:  3217 Time(s)

AWARE-490x495.png



_________________
RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 19, 2013 - 10:49 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
count_to_10
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2012 - 12:39 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1317

Status: Offline
Information overload. Just ask the LSST team.

_________________
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
spazsinbad
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2012 - 12:52 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7831
Location: OZ
Shirley Onboard F-35 future computer systems will deal with the new DARPA camera tech? I'm not asking LSST anything thanks.

_________________
RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
southernphantom
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2012 - 01:39 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 745
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
I don't even want to think about transmission speeds, unless suitable algorithms are developed to automatically cut to small FoVs for transmission purposes.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
count_to_10
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2012 - 02:18 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1317

Status: Offline
count_to_10 wrote:
Information overload. Just ask the LSST team.

http://www.lsst.org/lsst/
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope.
The data flow rate is hard to manage.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
spazsinbad
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2012 - 03:05 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: May 05, 2009 - 10:31 PM
Posts: 7831
Location: OZ
So what. We can imagine a possible future use where a lot of issues today have been overcome. Better computers are on the way also that don't require specific accuracy for calculation; but likely will be good enough for some specific purposes (as above). I'll post an URL to this new computer paradigm info if it can be found again. A possible future is what is the topic here NOT how bad the present day issues may be.

_________________
RAN FAA A4G: http://tinyurl.com/ctfwb3t http://tinyurl.com/ccmlenr http://www.youtube.com/user/bengello/videos
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
neptune
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2012 - 07:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Oct 24, 2008 - 01:03 AM
Posts: 1136
Location: Houston
Status: Offline
This passive technology can help us to identify the component weaknesses in the equipment fielded against us for our EW attacks. SEAD/ DEAD tactics are more effective with more precise/ accurate data acquisition. EO DAS merges will see a few generations of evolutions. 50 gigapixel will be a good start. Smile
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
popcorn
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2012 - 12:45 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 2028

Status: Offline
southernphantom wrote:
I don't even want to think about transmission speeds, unless suitable algorithms are developed to automatically cut to small FoVs for transmission purposes.

The AESA radar can support broadband transmission speeds so maybe that's one possibility?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
popcorn
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2012 - 01:18 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Sep 24, 2008 - 09:55 AM
Posts: 2028

Status: Offline
southernphantom wrote:
I don't even want to think about transmission speeds, unless suitable algorithms are developed to automatically cut to small FoVs for transmission purposes.

The AESA radar can support broadband transmission speeds so maybe that's one possibility?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
count_to_10
PostPosted: Aug 24, 2012 - 11:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1317

Status: Offline
spazsinbad wrote:
So what. We can imagine a possible future use where a lot of issues today have been overcome. Better computers are on the way also that don't require specific accuracy for calculation; but likely will be good enough for some specific purposes (as above). I'll post an URL to this new computer paradigm info if it can be found again. A possible future is what is the topic here NOT how bad the present day issues may be.

I didn't mean anything by it other than that data transmission rates will a limiting factor.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic