Forum: F-35 Design & Construction

F-35 bumps and humps



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
f-22lm
PostPosted: Jul 27, 2012 - 09:35 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: May 04, 2012 - 04:09 AM
Posts: 143
Location: Miami
Hey guys I everybody is saying that the F-35s bumps and humps decrease stealth is that true? Thank you for answering I just really need to know. :)
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 24, 2013 - 11:53 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
wrightwing
PostPosted: Jul 27, 2012 - 10:18 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Oct 23, 2008 - 04:22 PM
Posts: 2025

Status: Offline
Decreases stealth compared to what? Not nearly to the degree of having external devices/stores.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
archeman
PostPosted: Jul 27, 2012 - 10:23 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Dec 28, 2011 - 05:37 AM
Posts: 314
Location: CA
Status: Offline
f-22lm wrote:
Hey guys I everybody is saying that the f-35s bumps and humps decrease stealth is that true? Thank you for answering I just really need to know. Smile


Not intending to slight your question but it may be overly broad.
For example:
When you ask if bumps decreases stealth one might reply "Decreased from what???"

The entire body design is a bump isn't it?

Every 'bump' has some kind of system orifice associated with it. Something that lives inside the airframe that needs access to the outside world to accomplish it's purpose. If you were to remove all those systems so that you wouldn't have the unsightly 'bumps' then you may increase your stealth signature at the terrible cost of having an airplane that was no longer a combat aircraft.

The entire aircraft and all it's systems is carefully reviewed.
capability vs. producibility vs. cost vs. stealth-signature
trade-off debates were a constant event during the design phase.

What you see now including 'bumps' are the end result of those debates.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
count_to_10
PostPosted: Jul 27, 2012 - 10:51 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1329

Status: Offline
At a basic level, you only get a radar return off of a surface when it is "normal" to you -- that is, face on. As such, bumps and wiggles in a surface that is inclined well away from any likely observer don't compromise stealth in important directions. However, edges are effectively "normal" to all directions perpendicular to the line that forms that edge, so all you have to do to get a return is have that edge be perpendicular to your line of sight. As such, the general idea in stealth is to limit the number of edges an aircraft has, and to align all the existing edges to a small number of directions. Any parts that stick up with a lot of edges need to be covered by a curved surface.

_________________
Einstein got it backward: one cannot prevent a war without preparing for it.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic