Forum: General F-22A Raptor forum

China's F-60, Nearly Identical to F-22



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
superfulcrum
PostPosted: Oct 14, 2012 - 01:19 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Sep 10, 2008 - 09:44 PM
Posts: 18

Status: Offline
probably an attempt at misinformation (China wants to show the world that it has superior military technology, just a wannabe superpower)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 25, 2013 - 11:50 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
count_to_10
PostPosted: Oct 15, 2012 - 12:21 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Mar 10, 2012 - 03:38 PM
Posts: 1331

Status: Offline
megasun wrote:
PhillyGuy wrote:
Scorpion1alpha wrote:

I'm also noting how crudely they've loaded and transported this mockup(?).


That's what I'm thinking, it's probably an RCS or structural test vehicle with no more representative working components than a shadow of a man represents him.

But, while our Raptor is flying in the sky blasting things and evolving, theirs is being (amateurly) lugged around by a flat bed truck. I'm not so worried.


I like to watch you guys commenting on this new aircraft, or others, although little is known. But I keep feeling some "arrogance" here and there, sorry.

There happen to be a news recently that X-47B is shipped from west coast to east coast Navy testing site, on a large truck, with a few pictures.

And, if you look at those pictures, the X-47B was shipped flat, not tilted at an angle.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
strykerxo
PostPosted: Oct 15, 2012 - 09:32 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: Mar 21, 2008 - 04:40 AM
Posts: 301

Status: Offline
It has been said the airframe alone is not the prime driver in building a modern fighter. As we can see both the Russian and Chinese designs look respectable, but all commentary tends to side on, just how good they truelly are. A true 5th generation AC (ie F-22) is the benchmark, any contemporary would have to meet or excel. The 4th generation AC are now being refered to as 4+ and 4++, through various upgrades and mods. These new AC should be refered to as 5- until it proven otherwise.

Engines, software, EW, materials, etc., these are the prime movers.

It is what is under the skin that counts

_________________
You can't shot what you can't see - Unknown
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
PhillyGuy
PostPosted: Oct 17, 2012 - 12:47 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Sep 29, 2006 - 04:07 AM
Posts: 547

Status: Offline
megasun wrote:

I like to watch you guys commenting on this new aircraft, or others, although little is known. But I keep feeling some "arrogance" here and there, sorry.

There happen to be a news recently that X-47B is shipped from west coast to east coast Navy testing site, on a large truck, with a few pictures.


Hysteria is nothing new. Beware, China has aircraft! They rarely venture from the mainland. Beware, China has a massive sub fleet! They average 6 patrols a year (total). Call me when they're competent.

_________________
"Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic