| Author |
Message |
|
shingen
|
 Posted: Jul 01, 2012 - 05:02 PM
|
 
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:27 AM
Posts: 570
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
http://www.afa.org/mitchell/reports/MP9_ATF_0612.pdf
Development of the F-22 by an insider.
On stealth:
"The issue was whether it could be done in a balanced and affordable manner. This was a very controversial position in 1985—and it still is. There are many disbelievers in stealth, more than a few of them truly technically ignorant and proud of it." |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 19, 2013 - 3:58 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maks
|
|
Posted: Jul 02, 2012 - 04:17 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 05, 2007 - 06:43 PM
Posts: 48
Status: Offline
|
On page 39 (bottom, last sentence) it reads:
"However, in early 1991, the Navy bailed out of the ATF program.
...
(Note: The Navy still got a vote in the ATF competition, and, as we found out later for certain, it cast it for our F-22 team.)"
What does that mean in detail: did the Navy decisively influence the outcome of the competition even though the NATF project was no longer pursued). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
