Forum: Technology

Defending against anti-ship balistic missiles



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
1st503rdsgt
PostPosted: Jun 13, 2012 - 08:02 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Banned


Joined: Jan 23, 2011 - 01:23 AM
Posts: 1549

Status: Offline
Ark,

I never said that IRBM launches=nuclear war (though it could mean that in a tense situation). I'm saying that sinking a carrier=all-out war, which between nuclear powers, means nuclear war.

Second, when have the Chinese ever demonstrated this weapon? They seem quite eager to disseminate pictures and videos of their J-20 prototype as exposition of their technical prowess. As for that US demonstration: not ballistic and no target (moving or otherwise), a very poor comparison.

Third, radar doesn't run on magic. With an IRBM's flight profile, your costly Chinese mini-shuttles would need transceivers an order of magnitude more powerful and larger than anything a MARV could carry. Pershing II's MARV carried radar, but that was only for fine tuning it's trajectory at the very end of its flight to a stationary target; one still had to tell the inertial guidance system where the target was because there simply isn't time for an IRBM warhead to dick around looking for it.

_________________
The sky is blue because God loves the Infantry.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 19, 2013 - 3:38 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic