| Author |
Message |
|
tbirdsftw
|
 Posted: Jun 08, 2012 - 05:50 AM
|
 
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jun 08, 2012 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 5
Location: Prior Lake, MN
Status: Offline
|
It's insane how fast and close these guys fly!! One shows them when they fly as close as 18 inches!!
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval]
[Link pending approval] |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 25, 2013 - 5:48 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lightndattic
|
|
Posted: Jun 08, 2012 - 03:49 PM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Oct 06, 2005 - 01:43 PM
Posts: 494
Location: Dallas, Texas
Status: Offline
|
Ah yes... I remember being this excited about the T-birds and B A. Then I lost my first tooth.
Seriously though they're both great to see, but just for a change of pace, I actually like the Snowbirds better. True, they don't do the higher speed passes, but there's just so much more they can do with the extra aircraft. They just appear more graceful to me.
That's the main reason I think a combined T-birds/BA team with 9 aircraft could be better than 2 6 plane teams. You'd get all the speed passes combined with the larger group performance of the Snowbirds or Red Arrows. Even better if they're both flying F-35's at the time.
I'd love to see the Red Arrows some time, but missed them last time they were in the states. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stereospace
|
|
Posted: Jun 09, 2012 - 12:18 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Nov 21, 2009 - 05:35 PM
Posts: 652
Location: Columbia, Maryland, USA
Status: Offline
|
| I'm not as sophisticated and worldly as some so I still get excited at the T-Birds. Thanks for links. The shot over the Grand Canyon is spectacular. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tbirdsftw
|
|
Posted: Jun 09, 2012 - 04:28 PM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jun 08, 2012 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 5
Location: Prior Lake, MN
Status: Offline
|
|
Lightndattic wrote:
Ah [Link pending approval] I remember being this excited about the T-birds and B A. Then I lost my first tooth.
Seriously though they're both great to see, but just for a change of pace, I actually like the Snowbirds better. True, they don't do the higher speed passes, but there's just so much more they can do with the extra aircraft. They just appear more graceful to me.
That's the main reason I think a combined T-birds/BA team with 9 aircraft could be better than 2 6 plane teams. You'd get all the speed passes combined with the larger group performance of the Snowbirds or Red Arrows. Even better if they're both flying F-35's at the time.
I'd love to see the Red Arrows some time, but missed them last time they were in the states.
Yea I've gotta say snowbirds and red arrows put on one hell of a show. With restrictions now-days the [Link pending approval] Jet Teams can barely compete. Blue Angels fly their signature 18 inch wingtip to canopy separation at 350 mph (relatively slow) while the Thunderbirds I found out fly 18 inch *Fuselage* to canopy separation during the arrowhead loop, at 500+ mph. I know because I asked the Tbirds and it says on wikipedia. Anyways I love all air teams.
Here's a crazy late 70's Tbird link:
[Link pending approval] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tbirdsftw
|
|
Posted: Jun 10, 2012 - 04:51 AM
|
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jun 08, 2012 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 5
Location: Prior Lake, MN
Status: Offline
|
| Just saw Blue Angels today and to be honest I was a little disappointed, they weren't nearly as loud as the Thunderbirds, they missed show center numerous times, flew slow, and #6 had to land early. So somewhat disappointed, yea they flew their close formation at 18 inches at 350 mph, Thunderbirds 90% of the time are NEVER slower than 500 mph. They were still cool just I wasn't as inspired/impressed as have been in the past. Probably because in the past I have't seen the Thunderbirds. Now I've seen both, and your gonna wanna see the Tbirds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That_Engine_Guy
|
|
Posted: Jun 10, 2012 - 06:33 AM
|
|
|
Elite 2K
Joined: Dec 14, 2005 - 05:03 AM
Posts: 2198
Location: Under the engine somewhere.
Status: Offline
|
The Thunderbird's show is 100% better now with the PW-229 powered Block 52s. The vertical formation flying is awesome! (something they could never do with the PW-200 or PW-220)
TEG |
_________________
[Airplanes are] near perfect, all they lack is the ability to forgive.
— Richard Collins
|
|
|
|
|
|
lumpulus
|
|
Posted: Jun 12, 2012 - 01:51 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Dec 20, 2009 - 02:26 AM
Posts: 21
Location: Massachusetts(Originally Vermont)
Status: Offline
|
|
tbirdsftw wrote:
That is a great video...I saw them back then when they came to Vermont with the F-100s, and saw them when they had F-4a as well.
To me, the aerobatices are OK, it's the NOISE that I go for. I LOVE it when the ground shakes. Best pass I ever saw was at Westover when a B-1 doing a low, slow flyby, went to A/B at show center. Thunderous! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
southernphantom
|
|
Posted: Jun 13, 2012 - 05:34 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran
Joined: Aug 06, 2011 - 06:18 PM
Posts: 747
Location: Somewhere in Dixie
Status: Offline
|
I'm personally a Strike Eagle guy, but that demo team got axed. At least I got the opportunity to see one of the last Beagle flight demos 
I personally see the Blue Angels as being more of a precision-flying team, while the TBirds are for loud and proud high-speed passes. You know, I wonder if the USAF could pay Tracor/BAe to pull enhanced SLEPs on some QF-4s, given them to the TBirds...for extra noise...  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
flighthawk128
|
|
Posted: Jun 29, 2012 - 11:02 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Dec 24, 2011 - 11:25 PM
Posts: 49
Status: Offline
|
I'm Canadian, so being patriotic, Snowbirds for me.
But Blue Angels were the first demo team I ever saw, so they got my vote.
F-18's are just so graceful when in formation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
