| Author |
Message |
|
papakaz
|
 Posted: Jun 04, 2012 - 11:19 PM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 03, 2012 - 09:29 PM
Posts: 20
Status: Offline
|
| 16 Vipers in escort, 8 Mudhens with air-ground ordinance plus cannon only vs 16 Flanker-Es. You're flying lead in one of the 4 Viper flights. Question: How to protect the strikers? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: May 20, 2013 - 6:20 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
icemaverick
|
|
Posted: Jun 15, 2012 - 05:37 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 21, 2012 - 11:05 PM
Posts: 97
Location: New York
Status: Offline
|
| Why are the sending Vipers to protect the Mudhens? You'd think they'd at least send F-15Cs and if not those, F-22s. Don't forget that the Mudhens have some pretty good A2A capabilities themselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
redbird87
|
|
Posted: Jun 19, 2012 - 02:17 PM
|
|
|
Active Member
Joined: Aug 11, 2007 - 09:00 PM
Posts: 159
Status: Offline
|
| First, if you knew you'd be facing 16 SU-35s, you'd been taking steps to break down their formations and persistence before you ever sent F-15E's deep. Second, do we have the advantage of AWACS in this fight, or do they, or both or neither? Third, under no circumstances would the F-15Es go in with cannon and A2G weapons only. That defeats the very purpose of the "strike fighter". They'd be carrying at least 2 AIM-120 and 2 AIM-9s IMO. Fourth, depending on the target, it might be wise to reverse the role of 4 of the 8 Mudhens with 6 of the Vipers. The F-15E retains all the air dominance traits of its older sister and its much more powerful AESA suite could be used to quarterback and over-watch the 10 remaining A2A dedicated F-16s. That'd be a much more deadly mix for the SUs to contend with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Private Messages
Forum Guidelines
