| Author |
Message |
|
shingen
|
Posted: May 30, 2012 - 03:52 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 30, 2010 - 03:27 AM
Posts: 570
Location: California
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: May 21, 2013 - 9:19 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Roscoe
|
Posted: Jun 03, 2012 - 12:07 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jun 29, 2004 - 09:14 PM
Posts: 1279
Location: Las Vegas
Status: Offline
|
| Nice find. |
_________________ Roscoe
<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
|
|
|
|
 |
|
darkvarkguy
|
Posted: Jun 03, 2012 - 06:03 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 05, 2009 - 06:01 AM
Posts: 366
Location: Raleigh, NC
Status: Offline
|
|
Roscoe wrote:
Nice find.
X2! |
_________________ FB-111A Pease AFB 82-87
A-10A Suwon AB ROK 87-88
FB-111A/F-111G Pease AFB 88-90
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
Posted: Jun 03, 2012 - 03:19 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Mar 10, 2006 - 01:24 AM
Posts: 1193
Status: Offline
|
| this had come up a few years back too. The interesting thing is that the faster they flew, the greater their range (between M3 and M3.2 anyway) |
_________________ James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
tacf-x
|
Posted: Jun 04, 2012 - 07:47 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 17, 2011 - 03:25 AM
Posts: 431
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Status: Offline
|
| I'm sure that range increase had to do with more and more of the thrust and air compression coming from the inlet/augmentor combo than the gas turbine engine itself and that at mach 3.2 the inlet reached its shock on lip supersonic design point such that flow spillage would be eliminated and the shock formations weren't as irreversible right? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
Posted: Jun 04, 2012 - 02:45 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Mar 10, 2006 - 01:24 AM
Posts: 1193
Status: Offline
|
| more or less. The backside of the shock cone is making more thrust than anything else. |
_________________ James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|